Примеры использования They also referred на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
They also referred to persecution against Christians in Pakistan.
The organization's appeal emphasizes that Sheikh al-Azhar is wrong on two counts: first, that he has disregarded scientific ethics by ignoring the writings of eminent experts in Islamic law; second, that he invokes in support of his fatwa several Hadiths of the Prophet on the circumcision of men,claiming that they also referred to female circumcision.
They also referred to the need to strengthen their functions.
They also referred to the important role played by UNICEF in preparing the CCA/UNDAF.
They also referred to the large reserves accumulated by developing countries as self-insurance.
They also referred to avoiding actions that would lead to an escalation of violence on the Blue Line.
They also referred to each of the seven thematic topics on which they were to report.
They also referred to the importance of exploring the links between article 29(1) and other particularly relevant articles.
They also referred to changes in the school curriculum and the introduction of the achievement tests to evaluate children.
They also referred to the constant flow of arms to the Syrian Arab Republic, which further fuelled the conflict.
They also referred to the possibilities to encourage voluntary commitments, approaches on"corporate behaviour" and investors' responsibilities.
They also referred to various measures introduced by the Government to minimize environmental degradation in the areas where hydrocarbons were extracted.
They also referred to the financial crisis that UNHCR faced during 2000-2003, which diverted attention from the longer-term perspective to a day-to-day approach.
They also referred to the use of the term"foreign agents", which can lead to increased stigmatization and vulnerability to acts of violence against those targeted.
They also referred to monthly inspection by the military hierarchy and indicated that the President of a local NGO, the Ligue des Droits de l'Homme, had visited.
They also referred to agreements on extradition and mutual legal assistance, the sharing of information, best practices in the area of law enforcement and joint investigations.
In this regard they also referred to article 159, paragraph 3, which provided that the sessions of the Assembly shall take place at the seat of the Authority, namely, in Jamaica.
They also referred to oversight and enforcement mechanisms designed to ensure that public information on funding is accurate and that controls on funding are respected.
They also referred to legislative developments in regard to the death penalty, the conditions and procedures for its imposition by the courts and the safeguards to be provided.
They also referred to other deficiencies of such a mechanism, like practical limitations in long-term humanitarian operations where the security situation might change over time.
They also referred to the growing pressure on competent authorities to take some kind of measures to counter the selective application of the provisions of the TIR Convention by the Russian authorities.
They also referred to the fact that the comprehensive Dublin II outcome document of November 2011 had been signed by all of the Chairs and that it had subsequently been endorsed by a majority of the treaty bodies.
They also referred to measures taken at the national level, including legislation, policies, specialized institutions and programmes to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.
They also referred to the process of bringing national legislation into compliance with international standards for the implementation of the ratified instruments and taking into full consideration the requirements of Security Council resolution 1373 2001.
They also referred to the process of bringing national legislation into compliance with international standards for the implementation of the ratified instruments and taking into full consideration the requirements of Security Council resolution 1373(2001) of 28 September 2001.
They also referred to the process of bringing national legislation into compliance with international standards for the implementation of the ratified instruments and taking into full consideration the requirements of Security Council resolution 1373(2001) of 28 September 2001.
They also referred to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Open Door and Dublin Well Women v. Ireland, in which the Court found certain authors to be"victims" because they belonged to a class of persons which might in the future be adversely affected by the acts complained of.
They also referred to their adaptation to Sweden and the general situation in Afghanistan, and maintained that they would not be let into Afghanistan, should their expulsion be enforced. On 30 January 2008, the Migration Board rejected their applications and decided not to re-examine them.
They also referred to the need to continue to structure future training around the elements of the NAP process and proposed that the LEG could showcase samples of NAPs during training sessions. Finally, participants were eager to be provided with means that would facilitate the exchange of experiences with each other and with the LEG on a continuing basis.
They also referred to paragraph 13 of General Assembly resolution 50/103 of 20 December 1995 on the implementation of the Programme of Action for the Least Developed Countries for the 1990s, in which the Assembly recalled that at the end of the decade, a global review and appraisal of the implementation of the Programme of Action would be carried out, and called for effective implementation of activities under section 11A concerning that global review.