Примеры использования This loss element на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Panel values this loss element at US$381,495.
The Panel recommends no compensation for this loss element.
The Panel reclassified this loss element as a claim for interest.
The Panel recommends no compensation for this loss element.
The Panel finds that this loss element of the claim is not proved.
The Panel recommends no compensation for this loss element.
This loss element has been severed and assigned to the"F4" Panel appointed to review environmental claims.
The Panel recommends no compensation for this loss element.
The Panel finds that this loss element is compensable on the same basis as other claims for the cost of repairs.
Therefore, the Panel does not recommend an award of compensation for this loss element.
The amount of the downwards adjustment applied to this loss element was the historic cost of the tanks.
Accordingly, the Panel recommends that no compensation be awarded with respect to this loss element.
The Panel's recommendations regarding compensation for this loss element are contained in paragraph 240 below.
Accordingly, the Panel recommends that no compensation be awarded with respect to this loss element.J.
This loss element includes the claim that Jiangsu described in the category"E" claim form as"other" losses. .
Accordingly, the Panel does not recommend any compensation for this loss element.
This loss element is outside the jurisdiction of the Commission and is not compensable under Security Council resolution 687 1991.
Accordingly, the Panel recommends compensation for this loss element in the amount of US$37,819.
In the“E” claim form, ABB characterised this loss element as a claim for“income-producing property”, but the Panel finds that it is more accurately classified as a claim for loss of tangible property.
Further, the court decision discussed at paragraph awarded the amount claimed for this loss element against MoInf.
In the"E" claim form, IMP Metall characterised this loss element as part of its claim for"payment or relief to others.
In reply tothe article 15 notification, Engineering Projects increased the amount of compensation it sought in respect of this loss element to USD 62,508,772.
The Panel recommends no compensation for this loss element on the basis that the loss was not incurred by Freyssinet.
For the reasons described in the preceding paragraphs,the Panel recommends compensation for this loss element in the amount of KWD 22,149,459.
The Panel finds that Shafco's claim with respect to this loss element must fail on evidentiary grounds and accordingly recommends that no compensation be awarded.D.
In the“E” claim form, Prokon characterised this loss element as“contract losses”, but the Panel finds that it is more accurately classified as a claim for loss of profits.
In the"E" claim form, CLE characterised this loss element as"other losses", but the Panel finds that it is more accurately classified as a claim for financial losses. .
In the"E" claim form, National Projects characterised this loss element as"loss of earnings", but the Panel finds that it is more accurately classified as a claim for loss of profits.
In its claim form, Kaskade had characterised this loss element as a contract loss, but the Panel finds that it is more accurately described as a loss of tangible property.
In the“E” claim form, Energoprojekt characterised this loss element as“contract losses”, but the Panel finds that it is more accurately classified as a claim for loss of tangible property.