Примеры использования To formulate a reservation на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Competence to formulate a reservation at the international level.
The two Vienna Conventions of 1969 and 1986 contain no particular explanation with regard to the persons andorgans authorized to formulate a reservation at the international level.
Bis Competence to formulate a reservation at the internal level.
That position was, however,primarily dictated by the consideration that simply transposing the rules governing competence to formulate a reservation to competence to withdraw it was impossible.
Bis Competence to formulate a reservation at the internal level.
In relation to existing investment treaties,it was said that the transparency convention could permit a Contracting Party to formulate a reservation precluding the application of paragraph 3.
The presumption of freedom to formulate a reservation was different in substance from the presumption of the validity of a reservation. .
It seems essential, however, that the State concerned should formally reiterate the statement in some manner in order thatits intention actually to formulate a reservation should be clear.
It recognizes that a newly independent State has the right to formulate a reservation when making its notification of succession to the treaty.
The ability to formulate a reservation to a treaty, insofar as it did not seek to undermine the object or purpose of the treaty or a part thereof, was a principle of State sovereignty.
Draft guideline 2.1.3 defines the persons andorgans which are authorized, by virtue of their functions, to formulate a reservation on behalf of a State or an international organization.
As a result, any State would be in position to formulate a reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty without risking an objection, and article 19 of the Vienna Convention would become devoid of substance.
Subject to the customary practices in international organizations which are depositaries of treaties,a person is competent to formulate a reservation on behalf of a State or an international organization if.
As a result, any State would be in position to formulate a reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty without risking an objection, and article 19 of the Vienna Convention would become devoid of substance.
Article 16, now restricted to the"formulation of reservations", makes compatibility with the object andpurpose of the treaty one of the general conditions to which the right to formulate a reservation is subject; Ibid., p. 202.
The existing regime struck a balance between limitations on a State's ability to formulate a reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of a treaty and the goal of universal ratification.
In this matter, it is sufficient to draw on the definition of the reservations themselves, which is without particulars as to the category of State orinternational organization which is entitled to formulate a reservation.
Venezuela also understood that it was impossible under any circumstances for a State to formulate a reservation to a bilateral treaty or agreement, for that would entail the amendment or revision and renegotiation of a specific text.
During the second session of the Conference, the USSR once again submitted a similar amendment, which was debated at length,insisting on the sovereign right of each State to formulate a reservation and relying on the Court's 1951 advisory opinion.
Article 19 of the Convention denied a State the right to formulate a reservation when it was prohibited by the treaty, was not included among those that could be made in accordance with the provisions of the treaty or was incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
Draft guideline 2.1.3,"Formulation of a reservation at the international level", defined the persons and organs authorized, by virtue of their functions, to formulate a reservation on behalf of a State or an international organization.
Where a State purports to formulate a reservation to a constituent instrument of an international organization, some dialogue must take place within the framework of the competent organ upstream of the acceptance, or refusal of acceptance, of the reservation.
During the second session of the Conference, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics once again submitted a similar amendment, debated at length,insisting on the sovereign right of each State to formulate a reservation and relying on the Court's 1951 advisory opinion.
That means, in this case,that any of the authorities competent to formulate a reservation on behalf of a State may also withdraw it and the withdrawal need not necessarily be issued by the same body as the one which formulated the reservation. .
The objecting State or international organization cannot impose on a reserving State orinternational organization that has validly exercised its right to formulate a reservation any obligations which the latter has not expressly agreed to assume.
It was framed as if authority to formulate a reservation lay with a particular functionary and thus appeared to diverge from the rule in the law of treaties that that authority lay with the State, as an element of its treaty-making power.
On the other hand, the definition of reservations itself gives no information about the status of a State oran international organization that is empowered to formulate a reservation; it would not seem helpful to make the definition of objections more cumbersome by proceeding differently.
It is not uncommon for a State to try to formulate a reservation at a time other than that provided for by the Vienna definition, and this possibility, which may have some definite advantages, has not been totally ruled out by practice, particularly as the principle that a reservation may not be formulated after expression of consent to be bound"is not absolute.
The decision meets the concerns of States andfalls within the current trend towards establishing a"reservation dialogue" between a State which intends to formulate a reservation and the other contracting parties, facilitating such a dialogue through the length of time it allows.
Draft article 17(1)(b)proposed by Waldock in 1962 envisaged"the exceptional case of an attempt to formulate a reservation of a kind which is actually prohibited or excluded by the terms of the treaty"; he proposed that, in such case,"the prior consent of all the other interested States" is required.