Примеры использования To who should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
This begs the question as to who should invest in the arid zones.
Three questions are therefore important namely what type of information to provide when to provide it and to who should it be provided.
First, a question was raised as to who should be the contributors to the fund.
Even if one recognizes the right to require RAO to deduct royalties for music in a taxi,the question arises as to who should be the payer.
Their positions differed with regard to who should be entitled to participate in that process.
As to who should undertake the review, a single rapporteur was a possibility and all the Committee members had relevant experience and ideas that were worthy of examination.
Michael debates with the other survivors as to who should accompany him to the Others' camp.
A broader approach to who should be considered a tourist is offered by the World Tourism Organization UNWTO.
However, there is still discrepancy in the doctrine with regard to who should administer such property.
Questions were asked as to who should bear the cost of the notice required to be given under article 18.
In addition, the husband andwife are entitled to make a choice as to who should claim their children's tax relief.
The questions as to who should decide that proceedings had not been conducted independently, and on the basis of what criteria.
It is said, for example, that there seems to be a lack of agreement in three regions with regard to who should occupy the corresponding permanent seats.
Nevertheless, it raised questions as to who should decide whether a government, functioning or otherwise, existed.
Another view was that paragraph 23 should be deleted since it was inappropriate for the arbitral tribunal to make suggestions to the parties as to who should participate in the preparatory conference on their behalf.
The question arose as to who should be held responsible for such inaction and what measures had been taken to bring them to account.
The prosecutor's office and the judiciary first made recommendations to the Government as to who should be pardoned and there had actually been only two such pardons in the past year.
A question also arose as to who should decide whether an entity was an organ for the purposes of the articles should a difference of opinion arise in that connection.
Even if one recognizes the right to require RAO to deduct royalties for music in a taxi,the question arises as to who should be the payer: a taxi driver, a taxi company, or an aggregator representing orders?
Questions arise as to who should undertake the slimming down of inflated payrolls and who should pay for retrenchment benefits.
The situation where there was no functioning government to provide consent might be acceptable from a humanitarian standpoint butraised questions as to who should decide whether a government, functioning or otherwise, existed.
The question arises as to who should bear the cost of finding an alternative to the mines that have been planted to defend borders, especially in developing countries.
There appeared to be a lack of clarity between NATO member States that are States Parties to Protocol V and the NATO alliance which provides command andcontrol for its operations as to who should provide strike data on the use of explosive ordnance.
Their positions differed with regard to who should be entitled to participate in that process.
It was further stated that, if the Working Group decided not to modify the chapeau of paragraph 2(a) to restore consistency with article 36(1)(a), appropriate explanations should be provided to avoid confusion ordiverging interpretations as to who should bear the burden of proof.
In particular, a question was raised as to who should decide whether a given statement was defamatory.
In response, it was suggested that article 6 should adopt a more neutral formulation which focused on the autonomy of the parties to appoint conciliators; a choice of conciliators could not be imposed upon the parties and,if they could not agree as to who should be appointed, it would not be possible for the conciliation to take place.
Given the above-mentioned points, the question arises as to who should compensate for these damages and how the compensation should be made.
This results in lack of institutional commitment; infrequent scheduling of meetings of clusters; inadequate representation at cluster meetings; poor levels of continuity with respect to representation and communication within the cluster and within the agencies and organizations; inability of the clusters to mobilize resources and to commit dedicated resources for planning and implementing joint programmes and projects;confusion as to who should implement decisions; and inadequate monitoring and evaluation of actions and outcomes.
The scheduling of their invitations and the decision as to who should be invited are left to the Kingdom's authorities concerned with human rights.