Примеры использования Use of coercive economic measures на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In all international forums, it has voted to prevent the use of coercive economic measures.
In Thailand's view, the use of coercive economic measures is inconsistent with the principle of good cooperation among States.
Cuba calls on the international community to take immediate steps to eliminate the use of coercive economic measures against developing countries.
The Holy See has always opposed the use of coercive economic measures, which are harmful to the social development of a nation and its people.
The expert group met at Geneva from 1 to 3 May 1989 to consider effective approaches to the elimination of the use of coercive economic measures.
The Government of the Republic of Mali firmly condemns the use of coercive economic measures as a means of political compulsion.
Ecuador believes that the use of coercive economic measures to impose one State's will on another is inconsistent with the basic principles of international law.
It was agreed, however,that without clearly defined criteria, unilateral decisions on the use of coercive economic measures have the potential for arbitrariness and abuse.
In addition, Zimbabwe rejects the use of coercive economic measures as a tool to ensure political compliance with the whims of those countries that perceive themselves to be powerful.
In the absence of clearly defined criteria of acceptability, subjectivity in perception and judgement regarding the use of coercive economic measures have the potential for arbitrariness and abuse.
Exceptions, according to this view,include the use of coercive economic measures as part of an enforcement mechanism incorporated into internationally agreed instruments and regimes.
The expert group observed that the continued lack of clearly defined and generally agreed criteria of acceptabilityprovides for subjectivity in perception and judgement regarding the use of coercive economic measures and bears the potential for arbitrariness and abuse.
The Movement is concerned about the adverse effects of the use of coercive economic measures on the economy and development efforts of developing countries.
The use of coercive economic measures and the adoption of law and regulations with extraterritorial effect, including sanctions, to deter developing countries from exercising their sovereign right over their natural resources should never be encouraged.
The Non-Aligned Movement is concerned about the adverse effects of the use of coercive economic measures on the economies and development efforts of developing countries.
The increasing use of coercive economic measures as a means of economic and political compulsion has led to an increase of tension in international economic and political relations, which poses a threat to international peace.
Introducing the report on economic measures as means of political and economic coercion against developing countries(A/50/439),he said that it reviewed the major conceptual issues as well as methods to prevent the use of coercive economic measures, and could provide a solid basis for action by the Committee.
Belarus has repeatedly emphasized the inadmissibility of the use of coercive economic measures and believes that economic sanctions are a means of political pressure on a sovereign State.
The extension by the President of the United States of the relevant emergency law demonstrates the extent to which the United States is defying the will of the international community as expressed in General Assembly resolution51/22 of 27 November 1996, which determines that the use of coercive economic measures as a means of political compulsion is impermissible.
We express our deep concern at the continuing use of coercive economic measures against developing countries, through, inter alia, unilateral economic and trade sanctions which are in clear contradiction with international law.
Invoking General Assembly resolution 53/10, entitled"Elimination of coercive economic measures as a means of political andeconomic compulsion", the Republic of Iraq affirms its rejection of the use of coercive economic measures as a means of political and economic compulsion and of depriving States of their full sovereign right to choose their own political, economic and social systems.
Gravely concerned that the use of coercive economic measures adversely affects the economy and development efforts of developing countries and has a general negative impact on international economic cooperation and on worldwide efforts to move towards a non-discriminatory and open trading system.
The Government of Cuba is concerned that, despite relevant resolutions adopted in recent years by the General Assembly on the use of coercive economic measures against developing countries, which provide a clear mandate, the United Nations Secretariat has still not identified specific activities within the medium-term plan and programme budget for the proper implementation of those decisions.
The use of coercive economic measures and unilateral sanctions seriously affects the economic and social development of many developing countries, hinders the well-being of their population and creates obstacles to the enjoyment of their human rights, including the right to development, the right of everyone to a standard of living adequate for their health and well-being, and their right to food, medical care and the necessary social services.
In that resolution, the General Assembly, inter alia,expressed concern about the adverse effects of the use of coercive economic measures on the economy and development efforts of developing countries, and about the general negative impact on international economic cooperation and on world-wide efforts to move towards a non-discriminatory, open trading system.
The threat or use of coercive economic measures constitutes a flagrant violation of the principles of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, in particular of Article 2, paragraph 1, of the Charter, which states,“The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members”.
In that resolution, the Assembly, inter alia,expressed concern that the use of coercive economic measures adversely affected the economy and development efforts of developing countries and had a general negative impact on international economic cooperation and on worldwide efforts to move towards a non-discriminatory and open trading system.
Gravely concerned that the use of coercive economic measures adversely affects the economy and development efforts of developing countries and has a general negative impact on international economic cooperation and on the worldwide effort to move towards a non-discriminatory, open trading system.
In that regard, they condemned the use of coercive economic measures designed to prevent countries from exercising their right to decide their own political,economic and social systems, and they also called on all countries not to recognize unilateral, extraterritorial laws enacted to impose sanctions on other States and foreign companies.
The Non-Aligned Movement, in condemning the increased use of coercive economic measures on developing countries, clearly states that no State may use or encourage the use of political, economic or any other type of measures to coerce another State, including non-extension of most-favoured-nation status.