Примеры использования Use or threaten на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Involve use or threatened use of physical force against any individual at the premises of the Bank.
Illicit traffic in or stealing of nuclear material, its use or threatening to misuse it;
Pakistan will not use, or threaten to use, nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
Section 267 of the Criminal Code makes it an offence to carry, use or threaten to use a weapon in committing an assault.
We will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against nonnuclearweapon States.
Люди также переводят
It also believes that NSA should not be provided to those countries that use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction.
He noted with regret the use or threatened use of unilateral measures in international economic and trade relations.
The nuclear Powers have reserved the right to determine arbitrarily when and against whom they will use or threaten to use nuclear weapons.
Explosion, arson, use or threatening with use of explosive assemblies and radioactive, biological, chemical and other poisoning substances;
The only way to guarantee that no party would use or threaten to use nuclear weapons was to eliminate them.
In this context,Cuba believes that it is essential for nuclear-weapon States to unconditionally guarantee to all States of these zones that they will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons.
For its part,Pakistan has made a solemn pledge that we will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
The fact that nuclear States hold on to and develop their arsenals is a threat not only to the nonproliferation regime but also to international peace and security, because, by maintaining their nuclear weapons,these States can use or threaten to use these weapons.
China goes a step further andmaintains that it will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States, particularly those who are States parties to the NPT.
The nuclear-weapon States had continued to develop their nuclear capabilities andhad not provided credible assurances that they would not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
It was noted that statements by nuclear-weapon States that they would not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States were insufficient given that the statements were unilateral, conditional and revocable.
It is illegal to develop, produce, otherwise acquire, transfer directly or indirectly, receive, stockpile, retain, own,possess, or use or threaten to use any chemical weapon.
Such respect could also provide a basis for fair andsound international economic relations: the use or threatened use of force and sanctions violated the right of States to determine their own development and thus jeopardized global peace and security.
My delegation has upheld the principle that non-nuclear-weapon States parties to the NPT that fully comply with its provisions, in particular those contained in articles II and III,have a legitimate right to receive assurances from nuclear-weapon States that the latter will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against them.
Such acts would include insulting disabled or elderly persons,deliberate damage to property, the use, or threatened use, of firearms, and resistance to persons in authority or law enforcement officers.
One of the priorities of the final document of the 2015 Review Conference should be effective international arrangements for the conclusion of alegally binding international instrument, pursuant to which nuclear States will undertake to provide non-nuclear weapon States Parties to the Treaty with unconditional security assurances that they will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against them.
Thus, Department of Justice prosecutions of involuntary servitude require evidence showing the use or threatened use of physical or legal coercion by the defendant as a sufficient means of holding the victim to a condition of forced labour.
In order to curtail nuclear proliferation,every nuclear-weapon possessor must be willing to provide assurances that they will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against States that do not possess these weapons.
On 19 October 2010, the United Kingdom released its Strategic Defence and Security Review, in which it, inter alia,provided assurances that it will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and announced reductions in its stockpile of nuclear warheads.
In 1986, after the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty entered into force, the Chinese Government signed Protocols 2 and 3 of the Treaty in the following year, stating that China would respectthe status of the zone and would not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against this zone and would not carry out nuclear tests in the zone.
We must agree on the need for a binding international legal instrument to give assurances to the non-nuclear-weapon States that nuclear-weapon States will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons, and we must identify the means whereby progress towards this goal can be made.
Agreement must be reached on the need to formulate a binding international legal instrument in order toprovide non-nuclear-weapon States with guarantees that nuclear-weapon States will not use or threaten to use such weapons against them, and in order to identify the means whereby progress may be made towards that aim.
Mr. MACEDO(Mexico)(translated from Spanish): For the Government of Mexico one of the essential components of the disarmament andnon-proliferation regime is that the nuclearweapon States should guarantee unequivocally that they will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against all those of us that have voluntarily and legally renounced the nuclear option.
Carries, uses or threatens to use a weaponor an imitation thereof, or. .
The draft resolution will uphold the legal rule against acquiring, using or threatening to use nuclear weapons against anyone, and in particular against members of nuclear-weapon-free zones.