Примеры использования Vienna regime на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Applicability of the Vienna regime to human rights treaties.
The reservations dialogue in the context of and through the Vienna regime.
The Vienna regime, however, was silent on that point.
It was important not to alter the Vienna regime, which reflected customary law.
The guidelines should be assessed in the light of their compatibility with the Vienna regime.
That conception, which was incompatible with the Vienna regime, was subsequently discarded.
Thus, giving reasons is not an additional condition for validity under the Vienna regime.
These guidelines should not however alter the Vienna regime, but be supplementary thereto.
The Vienna regime applied to all multilateral treaties, including human rights treaties.
To accept this way of looking at things would render the Vienna regime utterly meaningless.
It should be recognized that the Vienna regime did not provide adequate guidance on the issue of objections.
The guiding principles it had adopted should be assessed in the light of their compatibility with the Vienna regime.
The objective was not to depart from the Vienna regime, but rather to strengthen it.
The Vienna regime applied to all normative multilateral treaties, including human rights treaties.
It was important not to alter the Vienna regime, which reflected customary law.
The Commission should therefore consider in greater detail the issue of objections with a view to clarifying the Vienna regime.
According to another view,it was debatable whether the Vienna regime had functioned adequately.
Under the Vienna regime, silence on the part of the States concerned was presumed to indicate acceptance of a reservation.
Several limitations were pointed out as regards the attempt to apply the Vienna regime on treaties to unilateral acts.
On the other hand, the Vienna regime was so general as not to exclude the establishment of special regimes to fill any gaps.
The Guide to Practice should take account of that practice andgive guidance to States if the practice was thought to be incompatible with the Vienna regime.
Therefore, while agreeing that the Vienna regime must be preserved, Portugal believed that it was fundamentally incomplete.
However, despite the clear rules and principles governing that subject,recent developments had led to a reconsideration of the Vienna regime.
In fact, under the Vienna regime on the law of treaties, human rights norms must be seen as essential rights to which every human being was entitled.
When States had objected to such reservations,they had asked themselves whether the application of the Vienna regime led to a satisfactory result.
Members agreed that in principle the Vienna regime should be preserved and that all that was needed was to remedy its ambiguities and fill the lacunae in it;
A unilateral act is valid and can therefore produce its legal effects if certain conditions are met,as provided for in the Vienna regime concerning treaties.
The Vienna regime established a satisfactory balance between the need to preserve the integrity of treaties and the need to guarantee their universality.
The reservations dialogue can nonetheless contribute to the smooth functioning of the Vienna regime, which is itself based on the principle of dialogue and discussion.
In this regard, the Vienna regime is clearly different from the traditional regime of unanimity, in which an objection, in itself, puts an end to the dialogue.