Примеры использования Vienna rules на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In so far as the intent is to preserve and apply the Vienna rules, it was necessary to clarify them.
The same shall apply to the advance on costs to be fixed by the Secretary General Article 42 Vienna Rules.
Once again, this raises the difficulty of transferring the Vienna rules to the regime that we are trying to elaborate.
Like the Vienna rules themselves, those set out in the Guide are, at best, residual and voluntary.
The adaptation to normative multilateral treaties of the"Vienna rules" relating to reservations cannot be evaluated in the abstract.
Люди также переводят
The Vienna Rules 2018 combine recent developments and well-tried provisions in order to create a modern set of rules. .
Other delegations, however, cautioned against a too close transposition of the Vienna rules on treaties to unilateral acts, in view of the different nature of the acts involved.
Moreover, that the Vienna rules do not pertain to the effects of invalid reservations is clearly confirmed by the great majority of States' reactions to reservations that they consider invalid.
It follows, at the very least,that the potential responsibility of a reserving State cannot be determined under the Vienna rules and that it is not pertinent to the"law of reservations.
Moreover, the irrelevance of the Vienna rules is clearly confirmed by the great majority of States' reactions to reservations that they consider invalid.
It follows, at the very least, that the potential responsibility of a reserving State cannot be determined in light of the Vienna rules and that that responsibility is not relevant to the"law of reservations.
This solution, which is not incompatible with the Vienna rules, has the advantage of reconciling the requirements of integrity and universality that are inherent in any reservations regime.
It does not appear desirable to favour one form of dialogue over another or to shut the door on newpractices that might develop over time and might produce results beneficial to implementation of the Vienna rules.
This is not especiallyproblematic in itself and is consistent with the idea that the Vienna rules are only of a residual nature as the guidelines in the Guide to Practice are.
Accordingly, the Vienna rules are simply a safety net which negotiators are free to reject or modify, particularly if they find it useful to do so because of the nature or the object of the treaty.
This is not especially problematic in itself andis in conformity with the idea that the Vienna rules are only of a supplementary nature as will be the guidelines of the Guide to Practice, and with all the more reason.
With regard to the unity or diversity of the reservations regime, it agreed with the Commission that the legal regime of the Vienna Conventions satisfied the requirements of all categories of treaties, including human rights treaties, and that,where they were silent, the Vienna rules applied.
They may derogate from the Vienna rules by stipulating a special regime in respect of reservations which contracting parties would consider more suitable for the purposes of the particular treaty they had concluded.
In order for these results to be achieved, the reserving State must formally withdraw its reservation or modify it in accordance with the rules of the Vienna Convention, andthe author of an objection must withdraw its objection according to the procedures prescribed by the Vienna rules.
The view had been expressed that, since the Vienna rules were deliberately optional in nature, it would be useful to make exceptions for certain treaties, which would of course be quite compatible with the Vienna regime.
Although an objection to a valid reservation is, as such, not covered in the Vienna regime, which ascribes no concrete legal effect to it,it nevertheless has an important role to play in implementation of the Vienna rules, including in assessment of the validity of a reservation, and is therefore part of the reservations dialogue.
The Vienna rules on invalidity of treaties were based on the consensual character of the legal situation created by a treaty and consequently addressed defects in the expression of the true will of the parties error, fraud, corruption, coercion, threat or use of force in violation of the Charter of the United Nations.
Mr. Klisović(Croatia), speaking on unilateral acts of States, said that, although simply transposing the rules of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties to all categories of unilateral acts would be inappropriate,the invalidity of unilateral acts was one area where the application of the Vienna rules mutatis mutandis was acceptable.
All disputes or claims arising out of or in connection with this contract,including disputes relating to its validity, breach, termination or nullity, shall be finally settled under the Rules of Arbitration(Vienna Rules) of the Vienna International Arbitral Centre(VIAC) of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber by one or three arbitrators appointed in accordance with the said Rules. .
As for the depositary, there is no reason to give him a role different from the extremely limited one assigned to it for the formulation of reservations in guidelines 2.1.6 and 2.1.7, which are a combination of article 77, paragraph 1, and article 78, paragraphs 1(d) and 2,of the 1986 Vienna Convention and are consistent with the principles on which the relevant Vienna rules are based.
In order to address the question of interpretation and the applicable rules, a distinction must first be drawn between conventional acts and unilateral acts, from both the formal and material points of view,since this will enable us to consider whether the Vienna rules can be transposed to the regime of unilateral acts, or give proper consideration to these rules, based on a flexible parallel approach.
There is, however, no reason to make such a distinction:while it can doubtless be maintained that at the time of their adoption the Vienna rules stemmed, at least in part, from the progressive development of international law rather than its codification in the strict sense, that is certainly no longer true today; relying on the provisions of the 1969 Convention, confirmed in 1986, practice has been consolidated in customary norms. See preliminary report(footnote 2 above) paras. 153-157.
The delivery agreements between the Russian company and the Austrian company, in compliance with article II(1) and(2) NYC, provided that their disputes would be settled without appeal in accordance with the Rules of Arbitration andConciliation of the International Arbitral Centre of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber("the Vienna Rules") by three arbitrators appointed in accordance with the Rules. .
On 1 January 2016 the Vienna Mediation Rules entered into force.
The rules of the Vienna Conventions.