Примеры использования Watercourse state на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Objectively speaking, such a State remained a watercourse State.
A watercourse State could cause various degrees of harm to another watercourse State. .
The population dependent on the watercourse in each watercourse State;
This means that a watercourse State will be entitled to become a party to any agreement, even partial, concerning that watercourse. .
There would be no justifiable ground to exclude a watercourse State from participation in the agreement.
Watercourse State means a State that is a party to this convention in whose territory part of an international watercourse is situated.
The effects of the use oruses of the watercourses in one watercourse State on other watercourse States; .
A watercourse State need not have suffered"appreciable" harm to be entitled to participate in the negotiation of any agreement on the matter.
Consultations and negotiations shall be conducted in the presence of an international observer whenever any watercourse State deems it necessary.
Mr. NEGA(Ethiopia), referring to chapter V of document A/48/10, said that, as a watercourse State, his country attached great importance to the Commission's work on the topic.
A watercourse State, whether or not it was a party to the convention, remained subject to the obligations under international law that resulted from its geographical situation.
The effects of the use oruses of the watercourse or aquifer in one watercourse State on other watercourse States; .
In the first case, the watercourse State is automatically liable, even though the activity which caused the harm may have met the criteria of equitable and reasonable utilization.
Mr. ROTKIRCH(Finland), referring to the annex,said that it would be logical to also replace the term"watercourse State" in article 3 with"riparian State. .
In the first case, the watercourse State was automatically liable, even though the activity which caused the harm might have met the criteria of equitable and reasonable utilization.
In the interest of consistency, therefore, he proposed that the same wording should be used throughout.He also proposed that the phrase"in each watercourse State" should be inserted in article 10.
Any watercourse State, especially those which were notified, should be entitled to inspect the works being carried out in order to determine whether they were in conformity with the plans submitted.
Mr. de VILLENEUVE(Netherlands), referring to article 18, paragraph 1,said that in the sentence beginning"If a watercourse State has serious reason to believe…", the word"serious" was superfluous.
If one watercourse State thought it was advisable to have a management agreement, it would be normal for the other States to enter into consultations, without the result being prejudged.
We propose thatartificial canals be excluded, so that canals dug between a watercourse State and another State do not entail the other State becoming a watercourse State.
Each watercourse State was an equal partner in the exploitation of water resources, and to deny that right would have harmful consequences for the ecosystem, the environment and the watercourse itself.
In other words,whenever a new activity deliberately undertaken or permitted by a watercourse State causes significant harm to other watercourse States, the obligation to make reparation will result.
A watercourse State shall, without delay and by the most expeditious means available, notify other potentially affected States and competent international organizations of any emergency originating within its territory.
Article 33 provided a residual rule forthe settlement of disputes, giving any watercourse State concerned the right to initiate unilaterally a fact-finding process or, if agreed, to resort to mediation or conciliation.
Before a watercourse State implements or permits the implementation of planned measures which it believes may have a significant adverse effect upon other watercourse States, it shall provide those States with timely notification thereof.
According to the commentary, the words"to a significant extent" in article 3, paragraph 2,had been chosen in order that the effect of the action of one watercourse State on another watercourse State could be measured by objective evidence.
Similarly, floods ordiseases originating in a watercourse State could spread to other States, which was why the definition of an emergency was extended to cover non-watercourse States. .
These two features of groundwater-- its mobile nature and its interrelationship with surface water-- indicate that the actions of one watercourse State involving its groundwater may affect the groundwater or surface water in another watercourse State.
Relevantly, the savings clause provides that the watercourse State is not obliged to provide data and information vital to national defence or security, but the obligation to cooperate in good faith is still applicable.
If a watercourse State has serious reason to believe that another watercourse State is planning measures that may have a significant* adverse effect upon it, the former State may request the latter to apply the provisions of article 12.