Примеры использования Working party asked governments на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Party asked Governments and river commissions to submit their proposals in this regard TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/39, para. 18.
In view of the overall importance of the subject under consideration the Working Party asked Governments to identify and nominate experts in the field of supply chains to become members of the Task Force.
The Working Party asked Governments and River Commissions to submit their contributions on this issue to the SC.3/WP.3's thirty-eighth session.
Recalling its decision from the fifty-third session(TRANS/SC.2/192, para.17), the Working Party asked Governments to provide information on the situation of the railways for its 2003 session.
The Working Party asked Governments to submit their position on the proposal by the Danube Commission to the secretariat, by the SC.3 October 2007 session.
In order to continue its discussion of summer time arrangements, the Principal Working Party asked Governments and the EC to provide the secretariat with information on summer time to be considered at the present session.
The Working Party asked Governments and river commissions to submit their proposals for supplementing the chapter with relevant basin-dependant rules.
Being informed that initiatives in this field were undertaken within CCNR, the Danube Commission, andon a national level, the Working Party asked Governments and river commissions to transmit relevant information on this subject and make their proposals as to possible use on E waterways of electronic charts and their possible standardization TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/40, paras. 27 and 28.
The Working Party asked Governments to submit their proposals regarding other possible work items to the secretariat, so they could be discussed at the next session.
At its fifty-fourth session(3-5 October 2000), the Working Party asked Governments to provide information on research activities in the field of railway transport TRANS/SC.2/194, para.53.
The Working Party asked Governments and river commissions to formulate their proposals on possible practical realization of the findings of the PIANC report vis-à-vis the existing classification system of inland waterways.
Note: At its fifty-fourth session(3-5 October 2000), the Working Party asked Governments and international organizations to provide information on new relevant developments in the following areas TRANS/SC.2/194, para. 57.
The Working Party asked Governments to comment on the draft proposal of the main expected accomplishment and indicators of achievement for inland water transport to be distributed by the secretariat prior to the October 2007 session of SC.3.
At its fifty-third session, the Working Party asked Governments and international organizations to provide information on new relevant developments in the following items TRANS/SC.2/192, para. 65.
To this end, the Working Party asked Governments to transmit their proposals on possible formulation of these qualification requirements taking into account, in particular, relevant provisions of chapter 23 of the Rhine Vessel Inspection Regulations(RVBR) as set out in TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/2002/4.
At its fiftieth session, the Principal Working Party asked Governments to provide productivity figures in rail transport for the year 1995 for each of the following criteria TRANS/SC.2/186, para. 10.
The Principal Working Party asked Governments and the EC to provide the secretariat with information on summer time arrangements to be considered at its next session.
In order tocontinue its monitoring of summer time arrangements, the Working Party asked Governments to provide the secretariat with information on this issue, if any changes to the EU's Directive(summer time starts at 1 a.m. UT on the last Sunday of March and ends at 1 a.m. UT on the last Sunday of October) are made, or if they do not comply with the Directive.
To this end, the Working Party asked Governments to transmit to the secretariat before 1 November 2002 their written proposals on possible formulation of these qualification requirements taking into account, in particular, relevant provisions of chapter 23 of RVBR as set out in TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/2002/4.
In order to continue its monitoring of summer time arrangements, the Working Party asked Governments to provide the secretariat with information on this issue, only if any changes to the Directive 2000/84/EC(summer time starts at 1 a.m. UT on the last Sunday of March and ends at 1 a.m. UT on the last Sunday of October) are made, or if they do not comply with the Directive.
Note: At its fortyfifth session, the Working Party asked Governments to study the text of two former additional Protocols to CMNI, which finally were not adopted by the CMNI Diplomatic Conference(document TRANS/SC.3/2001/3), taking into account proposals on its modification appearing in TRANS/SC.3/2001/5, ECE/TRANS/CMNI/CONF/6 and ECE/TRANS/CMNI/CONF/11 and make their written proposals on the text of the Protocols and on the way they should be dealt with TRANS/SC.3/155, para. 36.
The Danube Commission Note: At its twentieth session the working party asked Governments and river commissions to formulate their proposals on possible practical realization of the findings of the report of the Permanent International Association of Navigational Congresses(PIANC):"Standardization of ships and inland waterways for river/sea navigation" TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/1999/21.
In addition, the Working Party asked member Governments to provide similar information for its next session.
At its twentieth session the Working Party asked member Governments to provide it with information about new developments concerning demonstration runs of block trains along the Euro-Asian corridors on their respective territories.
As part of this activity, the Working Party asked River Commissions and Governments to identify which of their navigation regulations differ from CEVNI.
The Working Party asked the Governments of involved countries(Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Turkey and Ukraine) to provide again to the secretariat the same information for the same border crossing points in 2003.
In view of this, the Working Party asked the governments to consider which of these activities could be taken up in its future programme of work and to inform the secretariat about their proposals ECE/TRANS/SC.2/208, para. 22.
Furthermore, the Working Party asked member Governments to promote the use of these Guidelines when and if appropriate thus contributing to the standardization of the methodology used for transport infrastructure project appraisal throughout the UNECE region and, in particular, for appraisal of projects on Euro-Asian transport links.
The Working Party asked the secretariat to inform Governments, of the importance of the issue,asking them to submit candidates for the group of volunteer experts and inviting them to propose a new chair for the group.
Recognizing the importance of price andquantity indices to gauge the relative contribution of the transport sector to economic activity in each country, the Working Party asked the Governments of Croatia, France, the Russian Federation, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the United Kingdom to transmit information to this effect TRANS/WP.6/131, paras. 80-82.