Примери за използване на Acts of reproduction на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The acts of reproduction concerned should have no separate economic value on their own.
All of the conditions laiddown in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29 seek to permit acts of reproduction which are the condition for actual exploitation.
Thirdly, the acts of reproduction must have no independent economic significance.
The data capture process comprises the five phases described below which, according to DDF,lead to four acts of reproduction of newspaper articles.
In principle, such acts of reproduction have no independent value going beyond the economic significance of exploitation.
By its question, the referring court asks, in essence, whether the Satellite Broadcasting Directive has a bearing on the lawfulness of the acts of reproduction performed within the memory of a satellite decoder and on a television screen.
It follows that the acts of reproduction at issue in the main proceedings cannot be regarded as having independent economic significance.
As the limitation of the rights conferred by the Community design provided for in Article 20(1)(c) is distinct from that provided for in Article 20(1)(a),it must be held that the acts of reproduction referred to therein must be carried out in the course of a commercial activity.
It must be noted at the outset that the acts of reproduction concerned are not intended to enable a transmission in a network between third parties by an intermediary.
Consequently, the answer to the question referred is that the Satellite Broadcasting Directive must be interpreted as not having a bearing on the lawfulness of the acts of reproduction performed within the memory of a satellite decoder and on a television screen.
(c) in respect of specific acts of reproduction made by establishments accessible to the public, which are not for direct or indirect economic or commercial advantage;
This exception or limitation should leave intact the mandatory exception for text and data mining for scientific research purposes provided for in this Directive,as well as the existing exception for temporary acts of reproduction provided for in Article 5(1)of Directive 2001/29/EC.
In this regard, it is undisputed that those ephemeral acts of reproduction enable the satellite decoder and the television screen to function correctly.
Temporary acts of reproduction referred to in Article 2, which are transient or incidental, which are an integral and essential part of a technological process and the sole purpose of which is to enable.
First of all, they must be transient orincidental temporary acts of reproduction, which are an integral and essential part of a technological process.
Acts of reproduction for reference or for educational purposes, provided that they are compatible with fair trading practices, do not unduly prejudice the normal exploitation of the industrial model or design and mention the source;
Article 5.1 provides for an exception in respect of temporary acts of reproduction which are transient or incidental and form an integral and essential part of a technological process.
(c) acts of reproduction for the purpose of making citations or of teaching, provided that such acts are compatible with fair trade practice and do not unduly prejudice the normal exploitation of the design, and that mention is made of the source.
So far as concerns,finally, the fifth condition laid down by that provision, these acts of reproduction carried out in the course of a technological process make access to the protected works possible.
By judgment of 15 November 2010,(19) the Gerechtshof te's-Gravenhage, before which an appeal was brought, also dismissed the claim,holding that the fair compensation referred to in Article 16c of the CRL was intended to compensate the harm caused to rightholders by acts of reproduction falling within the scope of that provision.
Consequently, those temporary acts of reproduction are not capable of generating an additional economic advantage going beyond the advantage derived from mere reception of the broadcasts at issue.
However, the appellants, certain Governments that have submitted observations,and the Commission have put forward a number of arguments to demonstrate that such a right of producers must be limited so that acts of reproduction such as the one at issue in the main proceedings do not fall within the scope of that exclusive right.
The Court concluded that the sole purpose of the acts of reproduction at issue was to enable a‘lawful use' of the works within the meaning of Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2001/29.
Acts of reproduction such as those at issue in Case C-403/08, which are performed within the memory of a satellite decoder and on a television screen, fulfil the conditions laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29 and may therefore be carried out without the authorisation of the copyright holders concerned.
In those circumstances, given the principles set out in[57] and[58]of this judgment, those acts of reproduction must not exceed what is necessary for the proper completion of that technological process.
(c) in respect of specific acts of reproduction made by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums, or by archives, which are not for direct or indirect economic or commercial advantage;
If the acts at issue were not considered to comply with the conditions set by Article 5(1) of the Copyright Directive, all television viewers using modern sets which, in order towork, need those acts of reproduction to be carried out would be prevented from receiving broadcasts containing broadcast works, in the absence of an authorisation from copyright holders.
Each Party shall provide that temporary acts of reproduction referred to in Articles 66 to 70, which are transient or incidental, which are an integral and essential part of a technological process, and the sole purpose of which is to enable.
Unlike the Copyright Directive,this minimum harmonisation does not provide criteria to determine the lawfulness of the acts of reproduction performed within the memory of a satellite decoder and on a television screen(see, by analogy, Case C-293/98 Egeda[2000] ECR I-629, paragraphs 25 and 26, and SGAE, paragraph 30).
Consequently, the answer to the question referred is that acts of reproduction such as those at issue in Case C-403/08, which are performed within the memory of a satellite decoder and on a television screen, fulfil the conditions laid down in Article 5(1) of the Copyright Directive and may therefore be carried out without the authorisation of the copyright holders concerned.