Примери за използване на Aid is compatible на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Therefore, training aid is compatible with the common market if it fulfils all the conditions set out in Regulation(EC) No 68/2001.
For all cases notified,the Directorate-General for Competition should then form a view on whether the aid is compatible with the internal market.
Article 107(3)(b) of the Treaty empowers the Commission to find that aid is compatible with the internal market if it is intended‘to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State'.
For all cases notified,the Directorate-General for Competition forms a view on whether the aid is compatible with the internal market or not.
In order to determine whether or not aid is compatible with the common market pursuant to this Regulation, it is necessary to take into consideration the aid intensity and thus the aid amount expressed as a grant equivalent.
The procedure under Article 88(2) EC is essential whenever the Commission has serious difficulties in determining whether an aid is compatible with the common market.
If it does, it assesses whether the aid is compatible with the internal market by weighing the positive effects of the aid(contribution to the achievement of a well- defined objective of common interest) against its negative effects(distortion of competition and trade).
Article 108(3) TFEU requires, as a general principle, state aid to be notified tothe European Commission so that it can assess whether the aid is compatible with the internal market.
For all cases notified,the Directorate-General for Competition forms a view on whether the aid is compatible with the internal market The ESF is less prone to infringements of state aid rules since very often projects fall under the‘de minimis' rule.
A correct calculation of the extra investment orproduction costs to achieve environmental protection is essential to determine whether or not aid is compatible with Article 87(3) of the Treaty.
The granting of State aid is compatible with the internal market where the aid has a social nature and is granted to individual consumers without discrimination with regard to the origin of the goods or is intended to remedy the damage caused by natural disasters or other exceptional occurrences.
As has been pointed out in paragraph 113 of the present judgment, the procedure outlined in Article 88(2)EC is indispensable where the Commission has serious difficulties in determining whether aid is compatible with the common market.
Where, without initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU, the Commission finds, by a decision taken on the basis of Article 108(3)EC, that aid is compatible with the internal market, the persons intended to benefit from those procedural guarantees may secure observance therewith only if they are able to challenge that decision before the EU Courts.
However, it follows from paragraph 37 above that Article 106(2) TFEU did not require the Commission to take into consideration the second andfourth Altmark conditions in order to decide whether State aid is compatible with the internal market under that provision.
It follows that, where, without initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC, the Commission finds, on the basis of Article 88(3)EC, that aid is compatible with the common market, the persons intended to benefit from those procedural guarantees may secure compliance therewith only if they are able to challenge that decision before the Community Courts.
It is in the light of those principles that it is necessary to consider whether the applicant has succeeded in demonstrating that the contested decision is vitiated by a manifest error of assessment as regards the examination of whether the contested aid is compatible with the common market.
It follows that, where, without initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU, the Commission finds, by a decision taken on the basis of Article 108(3)EC, that aid is compatible with the internal market, the persons intended to benefit from those procedural guarantees may secure observance therewith only if they are able to challenge that decision before the EU Courts.
It follows that the Commission, when taking a decision in favour of an aid, may restrict itself to the preliminary examination under Article 88(3)EC only if it is able to satisfy itself after an initial examination that the aid is compatible with the common market.
In order toenable the Commission to carry out a more detailed assessment of any substantial amounts of aid granted under authorised schemes and to decide whether such aid is compatible with the common market, Member States must notify it in advance of any individual case of investment or operating aid granted under an authorised scheme or individually where the aid satisfies the following conditions(58).
This means that aid granted before the en- try into force of the 2014 GBER which was incompatible with the internal market at the time it was granted could subsequently be declared to be compatible, if the aid is compatible under new or changed provisions included therein73.
(2) Regulation(EC) No 994/98 also empowers the Commission to declare, in accordance with Article87 of the Treaty, that aid that complies with the map approved by the Commission for each Member State for the grant of regional aid is compatible with the common market and is not subject to the notification requirement of Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
A decision raising no objections to State aid may be adopted by the Commission at the preliminary examination stage under Article 88(3) EC, without opening the formal investigation stage under Article 88(2) EC, only if the Commission is able to satisfy itself at the end of that preliminary examination, without serious difficulties, that the planned aid is compatible with the common market.
In the light of experience gained, aid for European Territorial Cooperation projects should only have limited effects on competition and trade between Member States, andthus the Commission should be able to declare that such aid is compatible with the internal market and that financing provided in support of ETC projects is able to be block-exempted.
Having regard to the foregoing considerations, the General Court therefore did not err in law when it held in the judgment under appeal that Article 106(2) TFEU does not require the Commission to take into consideration the second andfourth Altmark conditions in order to decide whether State aid is compatible with the internal market under that provision.
Failed to identify the error made by the Commission in its assessment of the scope of the judgment in Deggendorf in so far as it applies to the present case in that, as a matter of fact,instead of regarding it as a further criteria in the assessment of whether aid is compatible, it made the non-recovery of earlier aid an additional and decisive condition for determining whether aid is compatible that is not provided for in the Treaty;
The Court's judgment did not call into question the Commission's conclusion that the aid was compatible with the internal market.
In Decision No 3/13/COL, the Authority assessed preliminarily whether the aforementioned amendments to the Icelandic VAT Act constituted state aid and, if so, whether the aid was compatible with the state aid provisions of the EEA Agreement.
On the basis of the information supplied, the Commission expressed serious doubts as to whether that aid was compatible with the common market.
This Regulation prescribes that the Commission may declare that certain categories of the State aid are compatible with the Treaty, thus exempting them from the pre-notification and the consent of the Commission.
Monitoring or formal requirements not met 43 It is important that managing authorities observe the monitoring, verification andother formal requirements set out for them to ensure that measures which constitute State aid are compatible with the internal market.