Примери за използване на Court considers it на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Court considers it is still her duty to appear here.
This however, shall not prevent the Court from sitting and exercising its functions elsewhere whenever the Court considers it desirable.
The court considers it has obligation to add comment to its verdict.
In the present case, regard being had to the documents in its possession andthe above criteria, the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum of EUR 2,000, covering costs under all heads.
The Court considers it expedient to examine those arguments together.
As regards the claim for costs and expenses incurred before this Court, regard being had to the documents in its possession andthe above criteria, the Court considers it reasonable to award EUR 2,495.
In the present case, the Court considers it appropriate to begin by examining the condition of direct concern.
The court considers a civil claim regardless of appearance ofthe civil claimant or his(her) representative, if the court considers it necessary or if the procurator supports the claim.
If the court considers it appropriate, it may permit a tape or video recording to be made of the evidence required from the witness;
In view of the extensive testimony, your continued silence, andon the recommendation of the doctors, the court considers it advisable, for your own safety, that you be committed to an institution as prescribed by law.
For these reasons, the Court considers it most improbable that a person in Mrs. Airey's position… can effectively present his or her own case.
Regard being had to the fact that the Court has found a violation of Article 8 of the Convention only as regards part of the period complained about, the Court considers it reasonable to partly grant this claim and accordingly awards EUR 4,000 under this head.
The Court considers it evident that travelling abroad for an abortion constituted a significant psychological burden on each applicant.
The referring court does no more than state, in this regard,that it is open to the Court, if the Court considers it appropriate, to provide the parties to the proceedings with more detailed definitions of those concepts.
But if the court considers it necessary, an appeal regarding a small claim may be adjudicated at a court hearing.
Completing the procedure within the period at issue can be made even more difficult if the applicant's location is not where the court has its seat and the court considers it necessary for the applicant to appear in person.
The Court considers it appropriate to examine these complaints solely from the standpoint of Article 2 of the Convention, which reads as follows.
Having regard also to the nature of the subject matter as well as the undoubted personal reticence associated with its disclosure in proceedings such as the present, the Court considers it reasonable to accept that each of the applicants travelled to England for an abortion in 2005.
The Court considers it appropriate to examine these complaints solely from the standpoint of Article 2 of the Convention, which reads as follows.
In addition to the above findings, the Court considers it appropriate to examine whether the interference complied with other requirements of paragraph 2 of Article 8.
The Court considers it evident, for the reasons set out at paragraphs 124-127 above, that travelling abroad for an abortion was both psychologically and physically arduous for each of the applicants.
In addition to the above findings, the Court considers it appropriate to examine whether the interference complied with other requirements of paragraph 2 of Article 8.
The Court considers it quite natural that the national authorities, whose duty it is in a democratic society also to consider, within the limits of their jurisdiction, the interests of society as a whole, should enjoy a wide margin of appreciation when they are asked to make rulings on such matters.
An application by a party to obtain evidence must be rejected if the court considers it to be irrelevant(Section 275(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure) or if it is submitted with the intention of delaying proceedings(Sections 178(2), 179 and 275(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure).
If the Court considers it impossible to release the offender from criminal liability in consequence of the expiration of the limitation period, capital punishment is not imposed.
While there are positive obligations inherent in effective respect for private life(see paragraphs 244-246 below), the Court considers it appropriate to analyse the first and second applicants' complaints as concerning negative obligations, their core argument being that the prohibition in Ireland of abortion where sought for health and/or well-being reasons disproportionately restricted their right to respect for their private lives.
Where the court considers it necessary to ask a conciliator or mediator to resolve a dispute, the economically weaker party may request aid from the state in order to cover the costs.
The Code of Civil Procedure also provides that if the court considers it necessary in the interests of resolving the case given the facts of the case and the proceedings thus far, it may oblige the parties to take part in a conciliation process under the Conciliation Act.
First, the Court considers it useful to respond to arguments put forward by a number of Member States to the effect that Articles 262 TFEU and 344 TFEU might preclude the envisaged transfer of powers.
Against this background of substantial uncertainty, the Court considers it evident that the criminal provisions of the 1861 Act would constitute a significant chilling factor for both women and doctors in the medical consultation process, regardless of whether or not prosecutions have in fact been pursued under that Act.