Примери за използване на Cow premium на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Applications for the special premium and the suckler cow premium.
The suckler cow premium is one of the aid schemes mentioned in Annex VI to that regulation.
Member States may lay down additional conditions for the grant of the additional national suckler cow premium.
The suckler cow premiums were allowed to remain 100% coupled, meaning that they could continue to be paid as before the reform.
Where applicable, the grant of any national premium in addition to the suckler cow premium, indicating.
However, the influence of the suckler cow premiums is not apparent from the general suckler cow trends in individual Member States.
When a farmer sells or otherwise transfers his holding,he may transfer all his suckler cow premium rights to the person who takes over his holding.
Applications for suckler cow premium shall be submitted within an overall period of 6 months during a calendar year, to be determined by the Member State.
The final figure thus obtained shall correspond to the maximum number of LUs for which the special premium and the suckler cow premium may be granted.
Provides that, as from 1 January 2005, the suckler cow premium must be paid as part of the single payment scheme referred to in Title III of Regulation No 1782/2003.
It is necessary to fix the date determining the elements to be taken into consideration for the application of the special premium and suckler cow premium schemes.
The additional suckler cow premium amounted to 51 million euro in 2010(down from 62,1 million euro in 2006), representing 5% of the total for the audited schemes.
A farmer keeping suckler cows on his holding may qualify,on application, for a premium for maintaining suckler cows(suckler cow premium).
Special premium, suckler cow premium(including when paid for heifers and including the additional national suckler cow premium when part-financed), and slaughter premium. .
There are some components within the current schemes which are explicitly targeted, namely the basic goat premium, the ewe andgoat supplementary premium and the additional suckler cow premium.
An additional national suckler cow premium as provided for in Article 111(5) of Regulation(EC) No 73/2009 may be granted only to a farmer who, in respect of the same calendar year, receives the suckler cow premium.
However, the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin queries whether that more favourable penalty may be applied in this case, given that,since 1 January 2005, the suckler cow premium has been granted, in Germany, in the form of a single payment.
Special premium, suckler cow premium(including when paid for heifers and including the additional national suckler cow premium when part-financed), and slaughter premium. .
In contrast, Germany, a Member State which had fully decoupled the audited schemes andwhich accounts for roughly 6% of the total suckler cow herd, experienced a declining trend from 2000 to 2004, when the suckler cow premiums were still available.
The additional national suckler cow premium shall be granted only within the limit of the number of animals qualifying for the suckler cow premium, if appropriate after application of the proportional reduction laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 115(1) of Regulation(EC) No 73/2009.
Article 68 of Regulation No 1782/2003, headed‘Beef and veal payments', provides, in that connection, in the first andthird subparagraphs of paragraph(2)(a)(i) thereof, that Member States may continue to pay the suckler cow premium under conditions provided for in Chapter 12 of Title IV of that regulation.
The additional national suckler cow premium shall be granted only within the limit of the number of animals qualifying for the suckler cow premium, if appropriate after application of the proportional reduction laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 115(1) of Regulation(EC) No 73/2009.
Member States may, for administrative reasons, provide that aid applications for direct payments referred to in Article 22 of Regulation(EC)No 1782/2003, as regards the special premium and the suckler cow premium, shall be for a minimum number of animals, provided that that number does not exceed three.
As regards the suckler cow premium in accordance with Article 125 of Regulation(EC) No 1782/2003, irregularities found with regard to the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals shall be allocated proportionately between the number of animals needed to receive the premium and the animals needed for the supply of milk or milk products pursuant to Article 125(2)(b) of that Regulation.
Case C-446/06: A.G. Winkel v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit(Beef and veal- Common organisation of the markets- Regulation(EC)No 1254/1999- Article 3(f)- Grant of a suckler cow premium- Conditions consistent with usual animal husbandry practice)(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven).
For instance, the synthesis of the evaluations analysing environmental impacts of CAP measures applied in different sectors19 shows that some coupled measures clearly have a positive environmental effect,in particular the suckler cow premium which, among other positive impacts, helped to maintain extensive farming.
The date of submission of the application shall constitute the operative event for determining the year to which animals coveredby the special premium, suckler cow premium, deseasonalisation premium and extensification payment schemes are allocated and the number of LUs to be used for calculating the stocking density.
When in a Member State exercising the power provided for in this paragraph, the total number of heifers, for which an application has been made, andwhich satisfy the conditions for granting the suckler cow premium, exceeds the separate national ceiling, the number of eligible heifers per farmer for the year in question shall be reduced proportionately.
When in a Member State exercising the power provided for in this paragraph, the total number of heifers, for which an application has been made, andwhich satisfy the conditions for granting the suckler cow premium, exceeds the separate national ceiling, the number of eligible heifers per farmer for the year in question shall be reduced proportionately.
The Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin queries, however, whether that more favourable provision applies in the casein the main proceedings, because, in Germany, since 1 January 2005, the suckler cow premium has been granted in the form of a single payment, with the result that the provisions relating to‘livestock' premia contained in Articles 57 to 63 of Regulation No 796/2004 are not applicable in that Member State.