Примери за използване на Judgment of the general court на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Judgment of the General Court of 7 December 2012- A.
Set aside point 1 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court.
Judgment of the General Court(Third Chamber) of 22 March 2011.
Simba Toys appealed to the Court of Justice against the judgment of the General Court.
Judgment of the General Court(Third Chamber)of 22 March 2011.
Simba Toys brought an appeal before the Court of Justice against the judgment of the General Court.
Judgment of the General Court(Second Chamber)of 13 April 2010.
By written pleading of 1 March 2012, the French Republic brought the present appeal against the judgment of the General Court.
Judgment of the General Court(Sixth Chamber)of 13 December 2012.
If the appeal is admissible and well founded,the Court of Justice sets aside the judgment of the General Court.
Judgment of the General Court(Seventh Chamber)of 10 October 2012.
Judgment of the General Court(Second Chamber) of 29 September 2010.
With regard to the Leipzig/Halle judgment, Germany considered that the judgment of the General Court does not have any effect as a precedent in case-law, as it is subject to an appeal.
Judgment of the General Court(Fourth Chamber)of 14 February 2012.
Decision 1 The proposal for review made by the First Advocate General concerns the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 19 July 2018, HG v Commission(T‑693/16 P, not published, EU: T: 2018:492).
Set aside the judgment of the General Court in full or in part and, consequently, cancel or reduce the fines imposed on the appellants; or.
Decision 1 The proposal for review made by the First Advocate General concerns the judgment of the General Court of the European Union(Appeal Chamber)of 23 January 2018, FV v Council(T‑639/16 P, EU: T: 2018:22).
They argue that the judgment of the General Court gives them less freedom in the extremely important last weeks before the deadline for deciding whether or not the transactions should be approved.
In the alternative, annul the defendant's decision of 28 August 2012 on account of its failure to take into account the requirements arising from the judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 in Case T-300/10;
GmbH against the judgment of the General Court(Ninth Chamber) delivered on 10 January 2019 in Case T-832/17 achtung!
As regards the second ground of appeal, inasmuch as it relates to the amount claimed in respect of the recruitment of Mr László Tibor Erdélyi and Dr József Virág as accredited parliamentary assistants,set aside the judgment of the General Court and refer the case back to it.
Porsche AG against the judgment of the General Court(Third Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2019 in Case T-209/18, Dr. Ing. h.c.
Set aside the judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 in Case T-61/18 in so far as it dismisses the claim for compensation in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the appellant;
Box 2 Summary Judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union(CJEU)10 December 2015: The judgment of the General Court of the EU5 annulled the Decision6 on the implementation of the agricultural agreement in the territory of Western Sahara.
Case T-103/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2012- Shang v OHIM(justing) Community trade mark- Application for the Community figurative mark‘justing'- Earlier national figurative….
On 14 December 2017(8),the Court of Justice of the European Union confirmed the judgment of the General Court of the European Union that annulled the Regulation imposing the anti-dumping measures as far as the applicant, Giant Co. Ltd., was concerned.
Judgment of the General Court of 22 April 2010: Italy v Commission(T-274/08 and T-275/08) where the Commission imposed corrections of 214 million euro relating to the 50/50 clearance mechanism, including interest.
EU Court of Justice sets aside the judgment of the General Court which had upheld the fine of €1.06 billion imposed on Intel by the Commission for abuse of dominant position.
They argue that the judgment of the General Court gives them less freedom in the extremely important last weeks before the deadline for deciding whether or not the transactions should be approved.