Примери за използване на Judgments given на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
(e) rules and procedures for the enforcement of judgments given in other Member States;
However, here, judgments given by the referring court, which is a court of first instance, are subject to appeal under national law.
The documents referred to in Article 5(2) and(6) and judgments given in accordance with Article 7 shall be served.
Judgments given in other Member States by virtue of Article 6(2), or Article 11 shall be recognised and enforced in Germany and Austria in accordance with Chapter III.
Chapter III, Section 1, of Regulation No 44/2001 is concerned with the recognition in a Member State of judgments given in another Member State.
Judgments given in other Member States by virtue of Article 6(2), or Article 11 shall be recognised and enforced in Germany and Austria in accordance with Chapter III.
Subject to the provisions of this Section,the procedure for the enforcement of judgments given in another Member State shall be governed by the law of the Member State addressed.
Judgments given in the other Contracting States by virtue of Article 6(2) or Article 10 shall be recognised and enforced in the Federal Republic of Germany in accordance with Title III.
Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, the procedure for the enforcement of judgments given in another Member State shall be governed by the law of the Member State of enforcement.
Judgments given by the Superior Courts may become enforceable again after ten(10) years from the date when the judgement or decree may have been enforced.
In proceedings instituted in the State of origin before this Convention, judgments given after its entry into force shall be recognized and enforced in accordance with Chapter III.
(b) judgments given by the courts of a Member State not party to the instrument establishing the common court which are to be recognised and enforced in a Member State party to that instrument.
It also eliminates the intermediate proceedings necessaryto enable recognition and enforcement, in other Member States, of judgments given in one Member State in the European Small Claims Procedure.
Under Article 21(1) of Regulation No 2201/2003, judgments given in a Member State are to be recognised in the other Member States without any special procedure being required.
This instrument governs the conferment of international jurisdiction as between the Member States of the European Union and the conditions andprocedures for recognition and enforcement of judgments given in the Member States, authentic instruments and court settlements.
They shall continue to have effect in respect of judgments given and documents formally drawn up or registered as authentic instruments before the entry into force of this Convention.
In that regard, it should be recalled that, according to recital 4 of that regulation, it is essential to unify the rules of conflict of jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters, in order to ensure rapid andsimple recognition and enforcement of judgments given in a Member State.
(21) The recognition and enforcement of judgments given in a Member State should be based on the principle of mutual trust and the grounds for non-recognition should be kept to the minimum required.'.
The proposal also eliminates the intermediate measures necessary to enable recognition and enforcement of judgments given in one Member State in a European Small Claims Procedure in other Member States.
For all legal actions brought, judgments given and acts issued on or after 29 January 2019, regardless of the date of marriage, Council Regulation(EU) No 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016 will apply.
However, if the proceedings in the Member State of origin were instituted before the entry into force of this Regulation, judgments given after that date shall be recognised and enforced in accordance with Chapter III.
Judgments given in a Member State by a court in the exercise of jurisdiction provided for in a convention on a particular matter shall be recognised and enforced in the other Member States in accordance with this Regulation.
However, if the proceedings in the Member State of origin were instituted before the entry into force of this Regulation, judgments given after that date shall be recognised and enforced in accordance with Chapter III.
(b) judgments given in a Member State by a court in the exercise of jurisdiction provided for in a convention on a particular matter shall be recognised and enforced in the other Member States in accordance with this Regulation.
According to recital 4 of Regulation No 1215/2012, the regulation aims, in the interests of the sound operation of the internal market, to introduce‘provisions to unify the rules of conflict of jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters, and to ensure rapid and simple recognition and enforcement of judgments given in a Member State'.
In the second place, judgments given by the courts of the Member States are subject to the system of judicial protection established by EU law and, in particular, to the preliminary ruling procedure, which is not the case for arbitration awards.
That solution guarantees respect for the right to a fair hearing and provides a fair balance between, on the one hand,the need to ensure that judgments given in a Member State are, as a rule, recognised and declared enforceable automatically in another Member State and, on the other hand, respect for the rights of the defence.
If it is held, conversely, that the child was at that time no longer habitually resident in the Member State of origin,a decision dismissing the application for return based on Article 11 is without prejudice to the application of the rules established in Chapter III of the Regulation relating to the recognition and enforcement of judgments given in a Member State.
Regulation(EC) No 44/2001 continues to apply to judgments given in legal proceedings instituted, to authentic instruments formally drawn up or registered and to court settlements approved or concluded before 10 January 2015 which fall within the scope of that Regulation.
If it was held, conversely, that the child was at that time no longer habitually resident in the Member State of origin,a decision dismissing the application for return based on that provision was without prejudice to the application of the rules established in Chapter III of the Regulation relating to the recognition and enforcement of judgments given in a Member State.