Примери за използване на Member state is responsible на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Each Member State is responsible for providing its citizens with healthcare.
(e) criteria and mechanisms for determining which Member State is responsible for considering.
An effective remedy should also be provided in situations when no transfer decision is taken butthe applicant claims that another Member State is responsible.
Criteria and mechanisms for determining which Member State is responsible for considering an application;
This Treaty shall apply to the European territories for whose external relations a Member State is responsible.
The criteria and mechanisms for deciding which Member State is responsible for considering an asylum application shall apply.
These provisions shall apply also to European territories for the conduct of whose foreign relations a Member State is responsible.
Criteria and mechanisms for determining which Member State is responsible for considering an application for asylum submitted by a national of a third country in one of the Member States, .
The provisions of the Treaties shall apply to the European territories for which the Member State is responsible in foreign relations.
The national African swine fever laboratory in each Member State is responsible for coordinating the standards and diagnostic methods in each African swine fever diagnostic laboratory within that State. .
The Treaty establishing the Constitution shall apply to the European territories for whose external relations a Member State is responsible.
The Dublin Regulation establishes the criteria andmechanisms for determining which Member State is responsible for examining an application for international protection.
Art 355(3) of the Treaty Establishing the European Union made specific provision for the application of the treaties to a territory for whose external relations a Member State is responsible.
The European Commission is currently considering a revision of the Dublin III Regulation(which determines which member state is responsible for processing which asylum application) and has pledged to present a legislative proposal before the summer.
Paragraphs 1 to 4 shall be without prejudice to the possibility for a Member State to make separate legal andadministrative arrangements for overseas European territories for whose external relations that Member State is responsible.
The Dublin Regulation establishes the criteria andmechanisms for determining which EU Member State is responsible for examining an asylum application.
An example of such a provision in a Treaty is provided in the EU Treaties themselves, with Article 355(3)TFEU providing that the EU Treaties shall apply to the European territories for whose external relations a Member State is responsible.
In the light of a recent judgment of the Court ofJustice of the EU, the Commission is proposing to clarify which Member State is responsible for examining applications made by unaccompanied minors.
Where a Member State with which an application for asylum has been lodged considers that another Member State is responsible for examining the application, it may, as quickly as possible and in any case within three months of the date on which the application was lodged within the meaning of Article 4(2), call upon the other Member State to take charge of the applicant.
If an applicant enters a Member State in which his need fora visa is waived, then that Member State is responsible for considering the application.
Where a Member State with which an application for international protection has been lodged considers that another Member State is responsible for examining the application, it may ð shall ï, as quickly as possible and in any event within three ð one ï months of the date on which the application was lodged within the meaning of Article 20 21(2), request that other Member State to take charge of the applicant.
The proposal has been made in the light of a recent judgment(3) of the Court ofJustice of the EU, which clarifies which Member State is responsible for examining applications made by unaccompanied minors.
Where a Member State with which an application for international protection has been lodged considers that another Member State is responsible for examining the application, it shall, as quickly as possible and in any event within one month of the date on which the application was lodged within the meaning of Article 21(2), request that other Member State to take charge of the applicant.
Where no transfer decision referred to in paragraph 1 is taken, Member States shall provide for an effective remedy before a court or tribunal,where the applicant claims that another Member State is responsible for examining the application.
It is a specific rule under the Dublin Regulation,which establishes that the Member States have to assess which Member State is responsible for examining an asylum application lodged on their territory.
The application of the corrective allocation for the benefit of a Member State is triggered automatically where the number of applications for international protection for which a Member State is responsible exceeds 150% of the reference share.
These definitions, laid down in EU law(Regulation EC/883/2004 as lastamended by Regulation EU/465/2012), are necessary to establish which Member State is responsible for the provision of social security benefits to EU citizens moving between Member States. .
The Court also held that allowing third-country nationals to lodge applications for visas in order toobtain international protection in the Member State of their choice would undermine the general structure of the system established for determining which Member State is responsible for considering an application for international protection.
These concern the aggregation of periods of insurance for creating or retaining a right to unemployment benefits,the export of unemployment benefits and the determination of which Member State is responsible for paying unemployment benefits to frontier workers and other cross-border workers.