Примери за използване на Misleading commercial на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
This may be considered to be a misleading commercial practice.
The misleading commercial practices may be: misleading actions or misleading omissions.
However, the measures should be directed not only at the business world and not only,as in the specific case covered here, at the misleading commercial practices of directory companies.
It is desirable that misleading commercial practices cover those practices, including misleading advertising, which by deceiving the consumer prevent him from making an informed and thus efficient choice.
Complaints of unsuitable for children ads in 2014 were 7 compared to 9 in 2013- they take second place in the procedures following complaints about misleading commercial communication(9 in 2014).
In that regard, it must be recalled that Article 5(4)(a)of that directive provides that misleading commercial practices can take the form of misleading actions within the meaning of Article 6 of that directive or misleading omissions within the meaning of Article 7 thereof.
The general prohibition is elaborated by rules on the two types of commercial practices which are by far the most common,namely misleading commercial practices and aggressive commercial practices.'.
In writing.-(CS) More than 400 petitions delivered to the European Parliament draw attention to the widespread misleading commercial practices employed by certain'business directory companies', consisting of persuading businesses and also non-profit entities to register free of charge in a directory, only to discover that they have signed a contract that also entails a fee.
Complaints about inappropriate adverts for children in 2013 were 9 compared to 8 in 2012, andthey take second place in infringement procedures following complaints of misleading commercial communication(of which there were 11 in 2013).
The first area is the support of small and medium-sized enterprises by EU bodies and institutions,in the context here of protection from misleading commercial practices; the second area is the protection of competition by preventing widespread unfair competition, which includes misleading and comparative advertising.
The new regulations, which will hopefully be approved by the European Parliament soon, specify that marketing a product as identical with a product of the same brand and packaging sold in other Member States, when in reality there are serious discrepancies in ingredients or characteristics,constitutes misleading commercial practice.
The New Deal for Consumers will update the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive in order tomake explicit that national authorities can assess and address misleading commercial practices involving the marketing of products as being identical in several EU countries, if their composition or characteristics are significantly different.
Since the Commission is obliged to ensure that this directive is properly implemented by Member States, it should take stock of the situation, and, where necessary, take appropriate corrective action. In particular, it has a duty anda responsibility to stop the misleading commercial practices used by'directory companies'.
The omission of material information and the provision of misleading information on the rights of passengers may also constitute an unfair or misleading commercial business-to-consumer practice under Directive 2005/29/EC concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market.
The new regulations, which will hopefully be approved by the European Parliament soon, specify that marketing a product as identical with a product of the same brand and packaging sold in other Member States, when in reality there are serious discrepancies in ingredients or characteristics,constitutes misleading commercial practice.
The New Deal for Consumers will update the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive in order tomake explicit that national authorities can assess and address misleading commercial practices involving the marketing of products as being identical in several EU countries, if their composition or characteristics are significantly different.
Regarding, in the first place, the question whether the model for concluding the contracts at issue in the main proceedings constitutes an aggressive commercial practice in all circumstances, it should be borne in mind that Chapter 2 of Directive 2005/29, entitled‘Unfair commercial practices', contains two sections, namely Section 1,relating to misleading commercial practices, and Section 2, relating to aggressive commercial practices.
Having regard to the Commission proposal to update the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive in order tomake explicit that national authorities can assess and address misleading commercial practices that involve the marketing of products as being identical in several EU countries, if their composition or characteristics are significantly different;
By its first question, the referring court asks, in essence, whether, in the context of a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software,the failure to indicate the price of each of those items of software constitutes a misleading commercial practice within the meaning of Article 5(4)(a) and Article 7 of Directive 2005/29.
Having regard to the Commission proposal to update Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices(UCPD) in order tomake explicit that national authorities can assess and address misleading commercial practices that involve the marketing of products as identical in several EU countries when their composition or characteristics are significantly different.
In light of the foregoing observations, the answer to the first question is that, in the context of a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software,the failure to indicate the price of each of those items of software does not constitute a misleading commercial practice within the meaning of Article 5(4)(a) and Article 7 of Directive 2005/29.
It specifies that the marketing of a good, in one Member State, as being identical to a good marketed in other Member States, while that good has significantly different composition or characteristics,can constitute a misleading commercial practice on the basis of a case-by-case assessment, unless justified by legitimate and objective factors.
In light of the foregoing observations, the answer to the first question is that, in the context of a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software,the failure to indicate the price of each of those items of software does not constitute a misleading commercial practice within the meaning of Article 5(4)(a) and Article 7 of Directive 2005/29.
Following up on the Commission's guidelines from September 2017, the New Deal for Consumers will update the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive in order tomake explicit that national authorities can assess and address misleading commercial practices involving the marketing of products as being identical in several EU countries, if their composition or characteristics are significantly different.
In the context of a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software,the failure to indicate the price of each of those items of pre-installed software does not constitute a misleading commercial practice within the meaning of Article 5(4)(a) and Article 7 of Directive 2005/29.
Following up on the Commission's guidelines from September 2017, the New Deal for Consumers will update the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive in order tomake explicit that national authorities can assess and address misleading commercial practices involving the marketing of products as being identical in several EU countries, if their composition or characteristics are significantly different.
By its first question, the referring court asks, in essence, whether, in the context of a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software,the failure to indicate the price of each of those items of software constitutes a misleading commercial practice within the meaning of Article 5(4)(a) and Article 7 of Directive 2005/29.
The fact that a trader provides, in an invitation to purchase, all the information listed in Article 7(4)of that directive does not preclude that invitation from being regarded as a misleading commercial practice within the meaning of Article 6(1) or Article 7(2) of that directive.
No misleading information in commercial transactions.
Consulting consumers in case of doubts concerning unfair, misleading and aggressive commercial practices;