Примери за използване на Private insurers на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
But Chollet says don't cry for these private insurers just yet.
Companies for which private insurers have cancelled credit limits completely are excluded from the scheme.
The public authorities rely entirely on the risk assessment of the private insurers.
Until the changes in 1989 and the advent of the first private insurers, DZI controlled Bulgaria's domestic insurance entirely.
The public insurance operates as a risk-sharing facility(‘a top-up') with private insurers.
He maintains that simplifying the payment structure and eliminating private insurers will make it easier for providers to absorb the cuts.
A few countries such as the Netherlands and Switzerland operate via privately owned butheavily regulated private insurers.
In the past, flood insurance was not easy to come by, since private insurers had largely left that market.
Chargebacks- canceled or contested transactions- are common in the medial supply chains in the United States,where various actors are involved in payment, including government programs and private insurers.
Evidence shows that as a consequence of the financial crisis, private insurers significantly reduced the cover offered, often withdrawing it altogether.
The drought could cost German farmers at least 2 billion euros($2.3 billion),according to the nation's GDV private insurers' lobby.
The state also prohibits public funding for abortions, and most private insurers there do not cover the procedure, which means it can be costly.
This leads to a strengthening of the position of the companies that benefit from the scheme compared to those who would potentially receive their coverage only from private insurers at a market price.
Even if the scheme were to be applied in an objective manner by the private insurers, only companies which saw their cover reduced during the crisis would be eligible under the scheme.
Deferred payment implies credit risk for the seller/exporter,against which they insure themselves, typically with the private insurers(so-called export credit insurance).
These elements, translated into the profits realised by the private insurers participating in the scheme over the period over which top-up cover was provided by the State, would have been recorded by another market player in the absence of the scheme.
And, for the most part, these services are not covered by other U.S. government agencies or private insurers, although there are some exceptions.
However, of the two letters from private insurers provided by Portugal pointing to the unavailability of cover in the private market, one of them(from CESCE, dated 22 November 2010) states that the financing needs of firms have also diminished due to the decrease of the buying markets.
The draft law would basically lead to the privatisation of the system,allowing private insurers to manage a large part of the state health budget.
Those letters explained the need for the scheme by referring to the increased risk of export credit insurance due to the general economic situation in times of recovery from the crisis, with a subsequent increase in prices andreduction of coverage from private insurers in certain sectors.
Moreover, the argument of the Portuguese authorities that the additional transactions insured are of lower risk than the transactions insured by the private insurer would lead to the conclusion that the private insurers accept, for a given level of premium, a higher risk, while they refuse to cover transactions with lower risk for the same level of premium.
As explained in recitals 21 and 64,the rates charged under the scheme represent 60% of the rates charged by private insurers to cover the same client.
The first involves abolishing the NHIF monopoly on the healthcare services market andgiving competitive private insurers access to this, until now, exclusively state-run domain.
As banks are not eligible to apply for the scheme,under which public insurance is offered only as a supplement to the cover granted by private insurers, the advantage is selective.
The bill, which has since been withdrawn, would have led to the privatisation of the healthcare system,allowing private insurers to manage a large part of the state health budget.
The recovery procedure is administered by the private insurer.
It is granted only as a supplement to the cover provided by a private insurer.
If that argument was correct,a rational private insurer would insure more transactions, which would increase their premium income while decreasing the risk.
In each transaction the State charges 60% of the rate charged by the private insurer, whereas the market price would have been 110% of the rate charged by the private insurer.
The advantage in monetary terms is the profit margin realised on the volume insured by each private insurer decreased by the costs associated to this volume.