Примери за използване на Rodbertus на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
This statement literally fits Rodbertus.
Thus Rodbertus declares here he is the real originator of the theory of surplus-value and that Marx robbed him of it.
But these representatives could not tell us anything about the economic writings of Rodbertus.
It was only in 1859, through Lassalle, that Marx learned of the existence of a certain economist named Rodbertus and thereupon Marx looked up the“third social letter” in the British Museum.
When this Book III appears, little mention will be made of the economist called Rodbertus.
Marx acknowledged this as early as 1861, while Rodbertus and the swarming mass of his admirers, who grew like mush-rooms under the warm summer showers of state socialism, seem to have forgotten all about that.
A similar masterpiece is his paper on the theories of rent of Rodbertus and Marx.
Neither Marx norI heard a word of Rodbertus' existence, until we had to criticise in the‘Neue Rheinische Zeitung,' 1848, the speeches he made as the representative of Berlin and as Minister of Commerce….
When this Volume III will appear, little mention will be made of a certain economist called Rodbertus.
Neither Marx norI heard a word of Rodbertus' existence, until we had to criticise, in the“Neue Rheinische Zeitung,” 1848, the speeches he made as the representative of Berlin and as Minister of Commerce.
It is our good fortune to be able to state what impression was produced on Marx by this stupendous discovery of Rodbertus.
He could so all the more since I know for certain that he was not in the least acquainted with the literary activity of Rodbertus until about 1859, when his own critique of Political Economy had been completed, not only in its fundamental outlines, but also in its more important details.
I am happy to say that we are enabled to ascertain what impression was produced on Marx by this stupendous discovery of Rodbertus.
He is a disciple of Rodbertus, who declared in the middle of the 19th century that capitalists“must expend their income to the last penny in comforts and luxuries,” for if they“determine to save… goods accumulate, and part of the workmen will have no work.”.
However, Sismondi always had the world-market in mind,while the horizon of Rodbertus does not extend beyond Prussia.
The only thing is that Priestly had actually produced oxygen first, while Rodbertus had merely rediscovered a commonplace in his surplus-value, or rather his“rent,” and that Marx, unlike Lavoisier, disdained to claim that he was the first to discover the fact of the existence of surplus-value.
In the preface to the second volume of Capital I had to square accounts with the gentlemen who raised a hue andcry at the time because they fancied to have discovered"in Rodbertus the secret source and superior predecessor of Marx".
On the other hand, Marx showed that he knew even then, without the help of Rodbertus, whence came“the surplus value of the capitalists,” and he showed furthermore how it was produced, as may be seen in his“Poverty of Philosophy,” 1847, and in his lectures on wage labor and capital, delivered in Brussels in 1847, and published in Nos.
How is it that Marx's theory of surplus-value struck home like a thunderbolt out of a clear sky, in all modern countries, while the theories of all his socialist predecessors,including Rodbertus, remained ineffective?
There is only this difference: Priestley had actually produced oxygen, while Rodbertus had merely rediscovered a common-place in his surplus-value, or rather his"rent;" and Marx declined to act like Lavoisier and to claim that he was the first to discover the fact of the existence of surplus-value.
How is it that Marx's theory of surplus-value struck home like a thunderbolt out of a clear sky, and that in all civilised countries,while the theories of all his socialist predecessors, Rodbertus included, vanished without having produced any effect?
The Rodbertian theory of surplus value is dismissed with the ironical remark:"Mr. Rodbertus first analyzes what happens in a country where property in land and property in capital are not separated, and then he arrives at the important discovery that rent- meaning the entire surplus-value- is only equal to the unpaid Edition: current; Page:[16] labor or to the quantity of products in which it is embodied.".
How is it that Marx's theory of surplus-value struck home like a thunderbolt out of a clear sky, and that in all civilized countries,while the theories of all his socialist predecessors, Rodbertus included, vanished without having produced any effect? ibid..
After he has read all that, he regards it as“an assault on society,” and finds that he has said much more briefly and clearly by what means surplus-value is originated, and finally declares that all this does indeed apply to“the present form of capital,” that is to say to capital as it exists historically, but not to the“conception of capital,” that is to say,not to the utopian idea which Rodbertus has of capital.