Примери за използване на So misleading на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Without being so misleading?
Facts could be so misleading, where rumors, true or false, are often revealing.
Words can be so misleading.
And they are so misleading to people that people started taking to this kind of sannyasa, getting out of their running away from their wives, their children.
First impressions can be so misleading.
They are so dry and they are so misleading to people, that people started taking to this kind of sanyasa, getting out of their houses, running away from their wives, their children.
Thirteen's one night stand collapses at her apartment, andher symptoms are so misleading that the diagnosis may be terminal.
In the extremely rare circumstances when management concludes that compliance with this Standard would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements of SMEs set out in Section 2, the entity shall depart from that requirement in the manner set out in paragraph 3.5 unless the relevant regulatory framework prohibits such a departure.
If other entities in similar circumstances comply with the requirement,there is a rebuttable presumption that the entity's compliance with the requirement would not be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework.
In the extremely rare circumstances in which management concludes that compliance with a requirement in an IFRS would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework, the entity shall depart from that requirement in the manner set out in paragraph 20 if the relevant regulatory framework requires, or otherwise does not prohibit, such a departure.
If other entities in similar circumstancescomply with the requirement, there is a rebuttable presumption that the entity's compliance with the requirement would not be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the.
In the extremely rare circumstances in which management concludes that compliance with a requirement in a Standard oran Interpretation would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework, the entity shall depart from that requirement in the manner set out in paragraph 18 if the relevant regulatory framework requires, or otherwise does not prohibit, such a departure.
(a)the title of the IFRS in question, the nature of the requirement, andthe reason why management has concluded that complying with that requirement is so misleading in the circumstances that it conflicts with the objective of financial statements set out in the.
In the extremely rare circumstances in which management concludes that compliance with a requirement in an IFRS would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework, but the relevant regulatory framework prohibits departure from the requirement, the entity shall, to the maximum extent possible, reduce the perceived misleading aspects of compliance by disclosing.
I do not like to shirk my responsibilities, so I used my vote,although the amendments were so misleading that I would probably be included in the numerous exceptions that they offered.
In the extremely rare circumstances in which management concludes that compliance with a requirement in an IFRS would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework, but the relevant regulatory framework prohibits departure from the requirement, the entity shall, to the maximum extent possible, reduce the perceived misleading aspects of compliance by disclosing.
(a)the title of the IFRS in question, the nature of the requirement, andthe reason why management has concluded that complying with that requirement is so misleading in the circumstances that it conflicts with the objective of financial statements set out in the.
In the extremely rare circumstances in which management concludes that compliance with a requirement in a Standard oran Interpretation would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework, the entity shall depart from that requirement in the manner set out in paragraph 18 if the relevant regulatory framework requires, or otherwise does not prohibit, such a departure.
When assessing whether complying with a specific requirement in an Australian Accounting Standard would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial reports set out in the Framework, management considers.
In the extremely rare circumstances when management concludes that compliance with a requirement in this Standard would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements of SMEs set out in Section 2, but the relevant regulatory framework prohibits departure from the requirement, the entity shall, to the maximum extent possible, reduce the perceived misleading aspects of compliance by disclosing the following:(a).
When assessing whether complying with a specific requirement in an IFRS would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework, management considers.
When assessing whether complying with a specific requirement in an IFRS would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Framework, management considers.
The nature of the departure, including the treatment that the IFRS for SMEs would require,the reason why that treatment would be so misleading in the circumstances that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in Section 2 and the treatment adopted.
The nature of the departure, including the treatment that the IFRS for SMEs would require,the reason why that treatment would be so misleading in the circumstances that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in Section 2 and the treatment adopted.
For instance, a person may be so misled by the prejudiced and hostile voices about religion all around him(from the school classroom to the popular media) that he has the unstudied impression that absolutely"no thinking person" sees any credibility to creationism, the historical or textural accuracy of the Bible, etc.
You are misleading so many people!
Thinking so would be misleading.
I'm so sick of misleading advertising.
So who is Rosemont misleading this time?
So your statement is misleading in that regard.