Примери за използване на Subjects with normal hepatic на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
AUC of ivabradine and the main active metabolite were about 20% higher than in subjects with normal hepatic function.
Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function velpatasvir total plasma exposure(AUCinf) was similar in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.
Peak concentrations of ramiprilat in these patients, however,are not different from those seen in subjects with normal hepatic function.
Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, systemic exposure following a single dose of axitinib was similar in subjects with mild hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class A) and higher(approximately two-fold) in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class B).
The AUC of ertugliflozin decreased by approximately 13%, andCmax decreased by approximately 21% compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
The mean AUC was unchanged in subjects with mild hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function; however, the mean AUC decreased by 28% and 31%, respectively, in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment.
The pharmacokinetics of naldemedine between subjects with mild ormoderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects with normal hepatic function were similar.
Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, systemic exposure following a single dose of axitinib was similar in subjects with mild hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class A) and higher(approximately two-fold) in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class B).
In patients with mild hepatic impairment(Child Pugh score up to 7)unbound AUC of ivabradine and the main active metabolite were about 20% higher than in subjects with normal hepatic function.
Unbound cobimetinib exposures were similar between subjects with mild andmoderate hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function while subjects with severe hepatic impairment had approximately 2-fold higher exposures(see section 4.2).
In addition, N-desmethyl metabolite AUC andCmax values were significantly increased by 154% and 87%, respectively in cirrhotic subjects compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
In subjects with hepatic impairment absorption rate was decreased and more variable,resulting in delayed tmax from about 50 min in subjects with normal hepatic function to about 85 min in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment.
There was a modest increase of about 20% in the mean baseline corrected exposure(AUC) to parathyroid hormone in a study conducted in 6 men and6 women with moderate hepatic impairment as compared with a matched group of 12 subjects with normal hepatic function.
Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis that included 74 subjects with mild hepatic impairment, 7 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and 442 subjects with normal hepatic function, venetoclax exposures are similar in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function.
Systemic exposures after a single dose of SUTENT were similar in subjects with mild ormoderate(Child-Pugh Class A and B) hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
In severely hepatic-impaired subjects, the mean Cmax and AUC adjusted for the 70 mg dose were decreased by 43% and 28%, respectively,compared to subjects with normal hepatic function(see sections 4.2 and 4.4).
No clinically relevant differences in elvitegravir orcobicistat pharmacokinetics were observed between patients with moderate hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function.
Unbound AUC0-INF was 37% higher in patients with severe hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class C)as compared to healthy subjects with normal hepatic function(see section 4.2).
In patients with severe hepatic impairment, total plasma concentrations of tenofovir alafenamide andtenofovir are lower than those seen in subjects with normal hepatic function.
Mean half-lives of total and free MTP-PE in mild hepatic impairment were 2.02 hours and 1.99 hours, respectively, andwere comparable to those in subjects with normal hepatic function(2.15 hours and 2.26 hours, respectively).
Fosamprenavir with ritonavir was generally well-tolerated in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment, and these regimens had similar adverse event andclinical laboratory profiles as previous studies of HIV-1 infected subjects with normal hepatic function.
Moderate(Child-Pugh class B; n=8) or severe(Child-Pugh class C; n=9)hepatic impairment and in 8 healthy subjects with normal hepatic function.
In a phase 1 study, after administration of a single 75 mg subcutaneous dose,alirocumab pharmacokinetic profiles in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment were similar as compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
The geometric mean AUCinf(unbound AUCinf) of ceritinib was increased by 66%(108%)in subjects with severe hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function(see section 4.2).
In clinical studies with axitinib, the systemic exposure to axitinib was approximately two-fold higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class B)compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
The disposition of a single 20 mg dose of bazedoxifene was compared in patients with hepatic impairment[Child-Pugh Class A(n=6), B(n=6),and C(n=6)] and subjects with normal hepatic function(n=18).
Results indicate unbound gilteritinib exposure in subjects with mild ormoderate hepatic impairment is comparable to that observed in subjects with normal hepatic function.
The pharmacokinetics of dalbavancin were evaluated in 17 subjects with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment andcompared to 9 matched healthy subjects with normal hepatic function.
The pharmacokinetics of pirfenidone andthe 5-carboxy-pirfenidone metabolite were compared in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh Class B) and in subjects with normal hepatic function.