Примери за използване на Sudden inflow на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
And the sudden inflow of cash.
That provision of the Treaty has the specific objective of allowing the Union to react rapidly andeffectively to an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries.
Characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, the Council of Ministers, on a.
In both cases, however, the condition that there must be a close relationship between the emergency situation requiring the adoption of provisional measures and the sudden inflow of nationals of third countries is expressed.
(5) Sweden faces an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries in its territory due to a sharp shift of migratory flows.
Art 78(3) enables the EU institutions to adopt all the provisional measures necessary to respond effectively andswiftly to an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of displaced persons.
The current situation in Austria is characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries on its territory resulting from secondary movements across Europe, leading to a sharp increase of the number of applicants for international protection.
That provision confers a wide discretion on the Council in the choice of the measures to be taken in order toprovide an adequate response to an emergency situation characterised by the sudden inflow of nationals of third countries.
In the event of one ormore Member States being confronted by an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, provisional measures may be adopted for the benefit of the Member State(s) concerned.
When read in conjunction with Article 80 TFEU, Article 78(3)TFEU constitutes a specific legal basis for provisional measures which implement the principle of solidarity in emergency situations characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries.
In the event of one or more Member States being confronted by an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, may adopt provisional measures for the benefit of the Member State(s) concerned.
The Court holds in that connection that Article 78(3) TFEU[Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union] enables the EU institutions to adopt all the provisional measures necessary to respond effectively andswiftly to an emergency situation characterized by a sudden inflow of displaced persons.
The procedure states that“in the event of one ormore Member States being confronted by an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, may adopt provisional measures for the benefit of the Member State(s) concerned.
The concept of‘provisional measures' must therefore, in my view, be interpreted broadly, as Article 78(3) TFEU authorises the Council to adopt all the measures which it deems necessary in order todeal with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries.
Article 78(3) of TFEU states that in the event of one ormore Member States being confronted by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, may adopt provisional measures for the benefit of the Member State(s) concerned- after consulting the European Parliament, by the way.
This Decision establishes provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece,in view of supporting them in better coping with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries in those Member States.
In the event of an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries in a Member State, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may adopt provisional measures for the benefit of the Member State concerned, pursuant to Article 78(3) TFEU.
This Decision establishes provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece,in view of supporting them in better coping with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries in those Member States.
If any Member State should be confronted with a similar emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, and after consulting the European Parliament, may adopt provisional measures for the benefit of the Member State concerned, on the basis of Article 78(3) TFEU.
In the third place, the Slovak Republic, unlike Hungary, maintains that Article 78(3) TFEU did not provide an adequate legal basis for the adoption of the contested decision,since the condition of the existence of an‘emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries' was not satisfied.
It was adopted on the basis of Art 78(3) TFEU, which provides that‘in the event of one ormore Member States being confronted by an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, may adopt provisional measures for the benefit of the Member State(s) concerned.
Thus, it should be recalled that the second subparagraph of Article 1(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 4(3) of the contested decision provide that the Commission may submit proposals to the Council if it considers that an adaptation of the relocation mechanism is justified by the evolution of the situation on the ground orthat a Member State is confronted with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries due to a sharp shift of migration flows.
In that regard, it must be stated that the Commission's initial proposal, like the amended proposal, provided, in order tocope with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, for a temporary mechanism for the relocation of 120 000 persons, providing, in a binding manner, for the distribution of those persons among the Member States over a specific period.
This Decision establishes provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece,in view of supporting them in better coping with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries in those Member States.
In the event of one ormore Member States being confronted with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries and without prejudice to paragraph 1, the Council may, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, adopt provisional measures of a duration not exceeding six months for the benefit of the Member States concerned.
The Council Decisions on relocation establish provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece,in view of supporting them in better coping with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries in those Member States(Article 1 of the Council Decisions).
Article 78(3) of the TFEU provides a specific legal basis to deal with emergency situations at the external borders. It states that''In the event of one or more Member States being confronted by an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, may adopt provisional measures for the benefit of the Member State(s) concerned.
There is no doubt in my mind that that case-law is applicable in the present case, insofar as the contested decision reflects the political choices made by the Council in order to address an emergency situation, andthe response which it thus provided to the phenomenon of a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries to the territory of the Union is the result of complex assessments for which the Court cannot substitute itself.
If by 26 September 2016, the Commission considers that an adaptation of the relocation mechanism is justified bythe evolution of the situation on the ground or that a Member State is confronted with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries due to a sharp shift of migration flows and taking into account the views of the likely beneficiary Member State, it may submit, as appropriate, proposals to the Council, as referred to in Article 1(2).