Примери коришћења Measure for protection на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
Dated July 31, 2012,IS ANNULED due to effecting of the statute of limitations related to enacting of measure for protection of competition.
The measure for protection of competition is imposed to the company"Grand Prom d.o. o, Belgrade", in the amount of 0.9% of the total annual revenue generated in the 2008(112,439,961.00 RSD).
In that sense,the responsibility of association implies executing the amount payable related to the measure for protection of competition as a substantive administrative measure. .
Given the above,the Commission set a measure for protection of competition in the form of pecuniary fine in the amount of 1.6% of the total annual turnover realized in 2013 for all above stated companies.
The headline amount may be corrected by implementing other criteria for determining the amount payable on the basis of measure for protection of competition, which is determined during the proceeding.
Given the above,the Commission set a measure for protection of competition in the form of pecuniary fine in the amount of 1.6% of the total annual turnover realized in 2013 for all above stated companies.
In cases and under conditions determined by the Law and Regulation, at the request of undertaking to effect the payment in installments,the Commission may exceptionally approve the payment of amount imposed as the measure for protection of competition in such manner.
In the case of approved payment in installments of the amount payable on the basis of measure for protection of competition by the Commission, undertakings are obliged to submit in the identical timeframe the evidence on effected payment of each separate installment.
Exceptionally, the headline amount isincreased by factor 2, in the case when undertaking is repeating the act of competition infringement that is homogeneous to the act already determined with the measure for protection of competition(homogeneous repeated infringement).
In accordance with a legal obligation,the same Decision determined the measure for protection of competition in the form of mandatory payment of a fine in the amount of 4% of the total annual revenue generated in the 2009, which amounts to 301,950,520.00RSD.
Processing and identification of violations of competition with final and binding decisions, Commission has a significant effect in the case of exemption from payment of monetary fine as a measure of protection of competition,as well as when there are no conditions to determine the measure for protection of competition, as in some cases driven by the previous Law.
It also established the obligation of the party to concentration to suspend the implementation of concentration until the decision of the Commission, as well as Commission's competence, in case of implementation of concentration contrary to these obligations,to determine a measure for protection of competition to market participant, in the form of pecuniary fine in the amount up to 10% of the total annual turnover.
However, explanation of the judgment of the Administrative Court,states that both companies gain the right that the measure for protection of competition is not imposed to them, as they reported the existence of a restrictive agreement in the regime of validity of the previous Law under which provisions they have acquired that right.
It also established the obligation of the party to concentration to suspend the implementation of concentration until the decision of the Commission, as well as Commission's competence, in case of implementation of concentration contrary to these obligations,to determine a measure for protection of competition to market participant, in the form of pecuniary fine in the amount up to 10% of the total annual turnover.
While determining the level of the amount of the measure for protection of competition, the Council of the Commission took into account the fact that dairies-members of DANUBE FOODS GROUP didn't challenge data submitted by the Commission in the motion dated 20th December 2011, relating to realized annual turnover reported as business profit in financial statements.
In cases of existence of competition infringement in the form of restrictive agreements that pursuant to Article 10 of the Law are considered as cartel agreements,the undertakings may use benefits from provisions of Article 69 of the Law- Relief from the commitment from measure for protection of competition, as also foreseen in the beforehand mentioned European regulations(via the institute of leniency).
This procedure is repeated, since the Administrative Courtannulled the previous Decision, which imposed a measure for protection of competition to these companies in the amount of 1.38% of the total annual revenue generated in the 2009("Lasta" a.d. from Belgrade in the amount of 117,248,070.00 RSD,"Europe-Bus" d.o.o. from Valjevo in the amount of 1,737,765.00 RSD).
Also, legislator has determined that participants in concentration shall be required to interrupt the implementation of concentration pending enactment of the Commission's decision, as well as competence of competition authority that in the case of conducting concentration contrary to these obligations,determine the measure for protection of competition in the form of commitment payment in the amount up to 10% of the total annual revenue.
Of 22.11.2012, the claim of the"Grand Prom d.o. o, Belgrade" was partially accepted, and it annulled the Commission Decisionfrom September 20 2012, in the part where a measure for protection of competition is imposed to this company, on the grounds that the existing Law did not apply when the restrictive agreement is concluded, regardless that the company" Grand Prom d.o. o, Belgrade" has not reported a restrictive agreement.
No less important is the circumstance that this institute is also favorable for an undertaking- party to proceeding, in a sense that is enabled to propose commitments on its own that achieve the objective of measures from Article 59 of the Law(measures for removal of competition infringement),without enacting a decision on infringement that would also imply determining a measure for protection of competition.
Commission Imposed a Measure for Protection of Competition to Companies Vital and Victoriaoil JSCCouncil of the Commission for Protection of Competition enacted a decision establishing the infringement of competition and imposing the measure for protection of competition to companies Vital from Vrbas and Victoriaoil JSC from Šid, on the basis of concluded restrictive agreement that limits and controls production and market of edible sunflower oil.
Commission determined a measure for protection of competitionCommission for Protection of Competition, in the procedure conducted ex officio, found that the companies“D&D Travel”, Ltd., Niš,“DJD prevoz” Ltd., Niš and“Jeremic prevoz” Ltd., Niš, concluded a restrictive agreement which pre-arranged individual participation in the public procurement for Clinical Centre Niš(service for organized transport of workers in 2014).
Commission determined a measure for protection of competitionCommission for Protection of Competition, in the procedure conducted ex officio, found that the companies“D&D Travel”, Ltd., Niš,“DJD prevoz” Ltd., Niš and“Jeremic prevoz” Ltd., Niš, concluded a restrictive agreement which pre-arranged individual participation in the public procurement for Clinical Centre Niš(service for organized transport of workers in 2014).
Measures for protection of competition and sanctions for procedural breaches shall be paid in full.
Measures for protection of cultural and historical monuments and protected natural entireties;
If the defendant violates the measures for protection against family violence that the court pronounced him, he shall be punished by a fine and imprisonment from 3 months to 3 years.
All of our buildings are designed andbuilt in such a way as to provide environmental protection and the measures for protection at work are being observed within the whole company.
The good news is that you can take effective and affordable measures for protection by calling Chattanooga Roofing Service.
AOFI operates according to the principles of liquidity, security andprofitability consistently implementing the measures of preserving the real value of capital and measures for protection against the risk of business performance.