Примери коришћења Most programming на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
Being a very simple program in most programming languages.
In most programming languages, all basic data types are built-in.
Such a program is very simple in most programming languages.
Most programming in COBOL is now purely to maintain existing applications.
It is a fundamental component of most programming languages.
Most programming languages, conventional and unconventional, are Turing-complete.
That's a pretty basic practice in most programming languages.
Most programming languages have constructions for repeating a loop a certain number of times.
Names are a fundamental concept in most programming languages.
The phrase grammar of most programming languages can be specified using a Type-2 grammar, i.e.
Operators corresponding to logical disjunction exist in most programming languages.
Most programming languages have constructions for repeating a loop until some condition changes.
Hence this single construction can replace several constructions in most programming languages.
Most programming languages in use today allow the direct specification of recursive functions and procedures.
Trees, however, can be difficult to implement in most programming languages because of the large number of special cases involved in operations on the tree.
Most programming languages are context-free languages, allowing them to be parsed with stack based machines.
Division by zero is an unsafe and incorrect operation, buta type checker running only at compile time doesn't scan for division by zero in most programming languages, and then it is left as a runtime error.
Most programming languages require a considerable amount of state information, which is generally hidden from the programmer.
The conversion mechanism simply generalizes the ad hoc conversion rules(such as indeed between INTEGER and REAL)that exist in most programming languages, making them applicable to any type as long as the above principle is observed.
Most programming languages with control structures have an initial keyword which indicates the type of control structure involved.
Here are a few: Automata theory Formal grammar(language generators)Formal language(language recognizers) Lambda calculus Post-Turing machines Process calculus Most programming languages, conventional and unconventional, are Turing-complete.
Since most programming languages represent the source code as plain text, objects are defined by names, and their uniqueness has to be inferred by the compiler.
A Java program that writes out the numbers from 1 to 10, using a curly bracket syntax, might look like this: for(int i= 1; i<= 10; i++){ System. out. println("the number is"+ i);}The code above contains a common construct of most programming languages, the bounded loop, in this case represented by the for construct.
Unlike most programming languages, which ignore or assign little meaning to most whitespace characters, the Whitespace interpreter ignores any non-whitespace characters.
WEB is a computer programming system created by Donald E. Knuth as the first implementation of what he called"literate programming": the idea that one could create software as works of literature, by embedding source code inside descriptive text,rather than the reverse(as is common practice in most programming languages), in an order that is convenient for exposition to human readers, rather than in the order demanded by the compiler.
More generally, most programming languages include mechanisms for dispatching over different'kinds' of data, such as disjoint unions, runtime polymorphism, and variant types.
Most programming languages, restricting themselves to 7-bit ASCII, use the hyphen-minus, rather than the Unicode character U+2212- MINUS SIGN, for denoting subtraction and negative numbers.[3][4].
For this reason, most programming languages and especially functional programming languages make an effort to prevent the above events from happening except under controlled conditions.
Most programming languages are decidedly inferior to mathematical notation and are little used as tools of thought in ways that would be considered significant by, say, an applied mathematician.
Most programming languages(including Lisp, ML and imperative languages like C and Java) are described as"strict", meaning that functions applied to non-normalising arguments are non-normalising.