诉荷兰 英语是什么意思 - 英语翻译

• v. the netherlands

在 中文 中使用 诉荷兰 的示例及其翻译为 英语

I．第658/1995号来文；vanOord诉荷兰（1997年7月23日第六十届会议的决定）350.
Communication No. 658/1995; van Oord v. the Netherlands(Decision of 23 July 1997, sixtieth session).

AndS.A.诉荷兰，第142/1999号来文，2001年5月11日。
And S.A. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 142/1999, 11 May 2001.

在第846/1999号案件(Jansen-Gielen诉荷兰)中，委员会认为下述情况违反了这项规定：.
In case No. 846/1999(Jansen-Gielen v. the Netherlands) the Committee made a finding of a violation of this provision.

在第855/1999号案件(Schmitz-de-Jong诉荷兰)中，提交人指称受年龄歧视。
In case No. 855/1999(Schmitz-de Jong v. the Netherlands) an author had claimed discrimination on the ground of age.

使用武力的合法性（塞尔维亚和黑山诉荷兰），《2004年国际法院案例汇编》，第1011页。
Legality of Use of Force(Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 2004, p. 1011.

提交人回顾了，在Broeks诉荷兰、ZwaandeVries诉荷兰、和Danning诉荷兰等案中，委员会原则上认为社会保障立法须服从于第26条。
The author recalls that in Broeks v. The Netherlands, Zwaan de Vries v. The Netherlands, and Danning v. The Netherlands, the Committee, in principle, found social security legislation to be subject to article 26.

在第682/1996号案件(Westerman诉荷兰)中，申诉人因拒绝服从军令而被判处有罪(见以上第586段)。
In case No. 682/1996(Westerman v. the Netherlands), the complainant had been convicted for refusal to carry out military orders(see para. 586 above).

在第602/1994号案件（Hoofdman诉荷兰）中，原告无权领取暂时鳏夫养恤金，因为他没有同他的伴侣结婚。
In case No. 602/1994(Hoofdman v. The Netherlands), the complainant was not entitled to a temporary widower' s benefit, because he had not been married to his partner.

在第1609/2007号案件(Chen诉荷兰)中，提交人称，缔约国将他送回中国，将违背《公约》第二十四条下的义务。
In case No. 1609/2007(Chen v. The Netherlands), the author alleged that his deportation to China would be in breach of the State party' s obligation under article 24 of the Covenant.

委员会应当记得，在就第201/1985号来文(Hendriks诉荷兰)发表的意见中，委员会认为在那起与此相同的案情下，产生了第二十三条所述的问题。
The Committee should recall its views on Communication No. 201/1985(Hendriks v. The Netherlands), where the same or similar situation was considered as raising issues under article 23.

以下案件便因与《公约》条款不符而被宣布为不予受理：第873/1999号来文(Hoelen诉荷兰)和第934/2000号来文(G.诉加拿大)。
Cases declared inadmissible, inter alia for incompatibility with the provisions of the Covenant, are communications Nos. 873/1999(Hoelen v. the Netherlands) and 934/2000(G. v. Canada).

(a)鉴于来文人的律师提供的信息，建议委员会考虑停止审查14/2007号来文(L.P.H.诉荷兰)；.
(a) A recommendation that the Committee consider discontinuing the examination of communication No. 14/2007(L.P.H. v. the Netherlands), in the light of the information provided by the author' s counsel;

这一解释为人权事务委员会在两个标志性案例----Zwaan-deVries诉荷兰案和Broeks诉荷兰中发表的意见提供了资料。
This interpretation informed the Human Rights Committee' s views in two landmark cases, Zwaan-de Vries v. the Netherlands and Broeks v. the Netherlands.

作为确定定罪是否是最后性的另外一个理由，我们愿提到由委员会作出决定的先前的一个例子，即"W.J.H诉荷兰"(第408/1990号来文)。
As an alternative ground on which to determine whether a conviction was final, we refer to an earlier case decided by the Committee, W.J.H. v. The Netherlands(Communication No. 408/1990).

关于申诉人返回伊朗以后会遭受酷刑的问题，缔约国说，本申诉案的事实类似于X诉荷兰第36/1995号来文的情况。
With regard to the risk of being tortured upon his return, the State party submits that the facts in the present petition are similar to those in communication No. 36/1995, X. v. The Netherlands.

关于这一点，提交人援引了委员会在Broeks诉荷兰2和Zwaan-deVries诉荷兰3二案中对违反针对性别的立法所作裁决。
The author refers to the Committee' s findings of violations of gender-specific legislation in Broeks v. Netherlands and Zwaande Vries v. Netherlands in this connection.

A见《大会正式记录,第四十二届会议,补编第40号》(A/42/40),附件八.B,第172/1984号来文(Broeks诉荷兰案),1987年4月9日通过的意见,第12.3段。
A See Official Records of the General Assembly, Forty-second Session, Supplement No. 40(A/42/40), annex VIII. B, communication No. 172/1984(Broeks v. the Netherlands), views adopted on 9 April 1987, para. 12.3.

在第976/2001号案件(Derksen诉荷兰)中，委员会认为：.
In case No. 976/2001(Derksen v. The Netherlands), the Committee considered.

第714/1996号来文（Gerritsen诉荷兰）因这一原因被宣布为不予受理。
Communication No. 714/1996(Gerritsen v. the Netherlands) was declared inadmissible on this ground.

委员会重申了其一贯的判例，包括第180/1984号案件(Danning诉荷兰)，.
The Committee reiterated its jurisprudence, including case No. 180/1984(Danning v. the Netherlands), that.

委员会的结论是，第3/2004号来文（DungThiThuyNguyen诉荷兰）情况没有对来文者构成歧视。
It concluded that there had been no discriminatory treatment of the author in communication 3/2004(Dung Thi Thuy Nguyen v. The Netherlands).

如同《Benali诉荷兰案》的来文那样，提交人再次向缔约国当局提出直接涉及到委员会审议的事由的申请。
As in the communication of Benali v. The Netherlands, the author has reseized the State party' s authorities with an application which directly concerns the subject matter before the Committee.

例如参看第82/1984号来文，《Zwaan-deVries诉荷兰》，1987年4月9日通过的意见，第13段。
See communication No. 1533/2006, Ondracka v. Czech Republic, Views adopted on 31 October 2007.

在第五十八届会议上(2001年3月)，委员会通过了关于第15/1999号来文(E.I.F诉荷兰案)的意见。
At its fifty-eighth session(March 2001), the Committee adopted its Opinion on communication No. 15/1999(E.I.F. v. the Netherlands).

B见《大会正式记录,第四十二届会议,补编第40号》(A/42/40),附件八.D,第182/1984号来文,(Zwaan-deVries诉荷兰案),1987年4月9日通过的意见,第13段。
B See Official Records of the General Assembly, Forty-second Session, Supplement No. 40(A/42/40), annex VIII. D, communication No. 182/1994,(Zwaan-de Vries v. the Netherlands), views adopted on 9 April 1987, para. 13.

ArtimedesB.V.（荷兰）诉G&PToysB.V.B.A.（比利时）.
Artimedes B.V.(NL) v G& P Toys B.V.B.A.(Belgium).

在荷兰，是由公诉处负责对罪行进行调查和提出起诉，该处在此范围内对警察事务行使权力。
In the Netherlands the Public Prosecution Service is responsible for investigating and prosecuting crime, in which context it exercises authority over the police service.

HH.第786/1997号来文，Vos诉荷兰（1999年7月26日通过，.
HH. Communication No. 786/1997, Vos v. The Netherlandsadopted on 26 July 1999.

信中提到A.诉荷兰一案，在该案中，委员会确认这些调查结论。
It refers to the case A. v. The Netherlands, where the Committee confirmed these findings.

评注中可进一步引述2009年1月20日Kokkelvisserij诉荷兰案的裁决。
One could add to the commentary a reference to the decision of 20 January 2009 in Kokkelvisserij v. Netherlands.