영어에서 The inequality 을 사용하는 예와 한국어로 번역
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Programming
-
Computer
But let's see what the inequality is.
The inequality form is 1<x<1000.
I can't bear the inequality.”.
Graph the inequality y minus 4x is less than negative 3.
So that point does satisfy the inequality.
사람들은 또한 번역합니다
He also thought that the inequality of intelligence was of great importance.
Complete the Latin square based on the inequality signs.
That has resulted in the inequality of the standing of men and women throughout history.
Now, why is that happening to us? Why is the inequality rising?
See Brad Schiller,“The Inequality Myth,” Wall Street Journal, Mar. 10, 2008, A15.
And everything larger than that is a valid y, is a y that will satisfy the inequality.
It's about us, it's about the inequality between us.
In the monograph Bunyakovskii gave some results on the functional form of the inequality.
As is anyone who believes in bridging the inequality between men and women in society.".
The inequality can be stated quite generally using either the language of measure theory or(equivalently) probability.
You could put x is equal to 0 there,but then the inequality wouldn't be true, right?
Much of the inequality that exists today is a result of government policy, both what the government does and what it does not do.
No matter how many want to believe otherwise, the inequality in pay of men and women do exist.
An Economy for the 99 percent also reveals how big business and the super-rich are fuelling the inequality crisis.
As a result of his work on this topic the inequality today is often known as the Bienaymé-Chebyshev inequality. .
Unless we can reverse the inequality trends of the past 35 years… the ensuing social chaos will eventually destroy democracy.
So at least the grey arearelative to this equation, we can write the inequality y is less than x plus 1.
Unless we can reverse the inequality trends of the past 35 years, Piketty says, the ensuing social chaos will eventually destroy democracy.
Divide both sides by 4-- don't have to worry about the inequality since 4 is a positive number-- and we get j is less than or equal to 150.
He was set in the right direction by an inequality he found in a paper of Lavrentev who attributed the inequality to Ahlfors.
Historically division of labor originates in two facts of nature: the inequality of human abilities and the variety of the external conditions of human life on the earth.
The inequality is telling us that\(x\) is any number between 4 and\(-\frac{4}{3}\) or possibly\(-\frac{4}{3}\) itself and this is exactly what the interval notation is telling us.
But when the most successful in modern societies are nolonger a reliable benchmark, overlooking such a mismatch sees us continuing to reward their luck and augment the inequality.