Eksempler på brug af Injurious dumping på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Conclusion on recurrence of injurious dumping.
As a consequence, injurious dumping could, if at all, only be assessed on a regional basis.
Conclusion on recurrence of injurious dumping.
In case of injurious dumping caused by lowpriced dumped imports, the interest of a Community industry is that conditions of effective competition are restored.
Furthermore, the proposed prices did not eliminate the injurious dumping.
Folk også translate
In such an examination,the need to eliminate the trade distorting effects of injurious dumping and to restore effective competition shall be given special consideration.
Between 1993 and 1996, the injury was particularly severe given the circumvention by Chinese exporting producers and injurious dumping from other sources.
As concerns any regional assessment of injurious dumping, it should be noted that not all the conditions set out in this respect in Article 4(1)(b) of the basic Regulation were met.
It is clear that employment in these areas would also be jeopardised should injurious dumping be allowed to continue.
The request for an expiry review alleged that injurious dumping of imports originating in Russia would be likely to continue or to recur if measures were allowed to expire.
Thus, undertaking offers can be accepted only in cases where they have the effect of eliminating the injurious dumping and allow effective monitoring.
The request alleged that injurious dumping of imports originating in the People's Republic of China(China) would be likely to recur if the measures expired.
A Chinese exporting producer argued that market circumstances were not likely to lead to renewed injurious dumping from the People's Republic of China.
It is considered that if anti-dumping duties are not maintained, injurious dumping is likely to recur and that the situation of the Community industry, which worsened during the period under review, would further deteriorate.
First it should be borne in mind that the two types of duty have the effect of removing the effects of injurious dumping, and thus represent the same level of duty.
In 14 May 2002, the Commission received a complaint concerning the alleged injurious dumping by imports of disposable gas-fuelled pocket lighters, whether flint or piezo, with or without a refill valve originating in the People's Republic of China, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam disposable lighters.
Moreover, whatever its form, i.e. whether a minimum import price or an ad valorem duty, the effect of the duty is the same,namely to remove the effects of injurious dumping.
The essential viability of the industry would be threatened in the absence of measures to eliminate the injurious dumping, and indeed, one of the complainants has already become insolvent.
In this respect, it is stressed that whatever its form, i.e. whether a minimum import price or an ad valorem duty, the effect of the duty is the same,namely to remove the effects of injurious dumping.
It was considered that the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of injurious dumping should allow the Community industry to cover its costs of production and obtain a reasonable profit on sales.
For the purposes of establishing the level of definitive measures to be imposed,it is confirmed that the prices of the dumped imports should be increased to a level where injurious dumping is eliminated.
Even if the existence of large production capacity in the PRC does not in itself mean that injurious dumping will recur, this is nevertheless a meaningful indicator that should be taken into consideration.
In addition, the existence of an export licence system conceived andadministered by a third country government for the purpose of the preservation of the resources cannot be relied on to conclude whether or not injurious dumping would continue.
It can thus be concluded that the Community industry could not fully recover from the effects of injurious dumping for the reasons explained above and is therefore still in a fragile situation.
Given the above reasons, it is concluded that it is not considered that any possible impact on importers anduser industries would be capable of offsetting the positive effect on the Community industry of the measures against recurrent injurious dumping.
It was considered that the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of injurious dumping should allow the Community industry to cover its cost of production and obtain a reasonable profit on sales.
Measures, therefore, are expected to re-establish fair andeffective competition on the Community market, merely correcting the distorting effects of the injurious dumping practised by the Japanese exporting producer.
In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation,it was examined whether, despite the conclusion on injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed that could lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to adopt measures in this particular case.
It was claimed that by combining both the anti-dumping proceedings concerning the Republic of Korea andIndia, it was unfair to establish the same IP for the examination of possible injurious dumping caused by imports from these countries.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measures should allow the Community industry to cover its costs of production and to obtain a reasonable pre-tax profit that could be achieved in the absence of dumped imports.