Examples of using Right of asylum in English and their translations into Czech
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It has nothing whatever to do with the right of asylum.
The right of asylum is one of those fundamental rights. .
It must guarantee protection of the right of asylum.
You refer to the right of asylum, to the right to international protection.
According to the text read out, the requested intervention concerns all those who request the right of asylum.
It does not concern the right of asylum, Mr Catania.
The right of asylum is to become a vehicle for mass immigration on an unprecedented scale.
Mr President, it is important that the EU comes to grips with the problems of migration and the right of asylum.
The right of asylum and immigration where similar types of civilisation are concerned is not the problem.
In any case, I should ask the proposer to modify the amendment with the words'those who have the right of asylum.
The right of asylum is a precious right as it is a right inherent to the human being.
For the victims of poverty, war, natural disaster,the increasing restrictions on the right of asylum, what will change?
The right of asylum and subsidiary protection is not a tool for general migration into the 27 Member States.
The Group of the European People's Party(Christian Democrats)wholeheartedly supports the right of asylum and the right to protection for people who need it.
There is no other way to enter Europe; there are no legal channels for accessing the European labour market orfinding recognition of the sacrosanct right of asylum.
I should rather say'those who have the right of asylum', because'who request' is too dangerous, as there is the risk that anyone can request the right of asylum. .
I must therefore warmly thank Parliament and you, Mr President, and I hope that, by the end of the year,I can return with draft texts that will enable us to significantly improve the situation with regard to the right of asylum in Europe.
In any event, I too am convinced that equipping Europe with a truly harmonised right of asylum will be an excellent response to the problems that were mentioned during the previous debate.
I call on you, Mr President, to talk to the European Commission, the United Kingdom and France, and our House, our Chamber,must take up this issue in order to prevent this crime against the right of asylum from being committed.
This is one reason why we would point out that the lack of a common rule on the right of asylum exacerbates the situation, but we do not see much activity on the part of the political groups.
It is surely needless to recall that, in the context of addressing mixed migratory movements, the posting of ILOs in third countries may raise several concerns from a fundamental rights perspective, in particular, regarding the right of individuals to leave a country,including their own, and the right of asylum seekers to flee and find protection from persecution.
We are in the process of drafting an immigration policy based on three pillars:respect for the right of asylum, the fight against illegal immigration, and European coordination to provide for legal migration.
First, the need for European institutions to take a step forward in view of the current wave of chauvinistic violence, and to do so both in terms of legislation and to establish a clear legal basis to enable all forms of violence againstwomen to be combated; this should include, for example, recognition of the right of asylum on grounds of gender-based persecution.
In fact, I believe that it is not possible to support an extensive attitude to protecting citizens who request the right of asylum and the right to be recognised as a refugee to those who belong to terrorist organisations.
All of this shows the urgent need for a European immigration and asylum policy, and I welcome the work done by the current President of the Council with responsibility for this field, my friend Brice Hortefeux, the French Minister for Immigration, Integration, National Identity and Mutually-Supportive Development,who has just chaired the European ministerial conference on the right of asylum on 8 and 9 September 2008 in Paris.
I am going to listen to you closely as I am convinced that perfecting the right of asylum is an important issue for the future and, I would say, for our design of Europe which must remain true to its great tradition of welcoming people.
FR Mr President, I am wondering what actions the European Union will introduce to ensure that all Member States observe the right of asylum and respect the human rights of people arriving from the southern shores of the Mediterranean.
I will not do so, however,without saying with great feeling that I am not unmoved by the fact that the person who chaired this debate enjoyed the right of asylum because of the generosity and hospitality of the governments and people of France, Austria and Belgium, to whom I would like to pay a tribute of thanks here today, because there is no time limitation on gratitude, even though this happened more than 40 years ago.
The proposal referred to Parliament for a directive regarding the possible provision of a unified procedure for the 27 States of the Union in granting the right of asylum is an important step, but the delicacy of the issue requires careful and thorough reflection.
I therefore agree with the amendments to this directive and this regulation,I believe that we must guarantee the right of asylum to all those who ask for it because the future of the European Union depends on the quality of our reception.