Examples of using Al-qa'ida in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Al-Qa'ida is eager to put down roots in the region.
Now they have become a United States tactic in pursuit of al-Qa'ida.
One is the deputy head of al-Qa'ida in Yemen, and one has blown himself up.
Musharraf stated the militants were linked to al-Qa'ida.
He was in contact with al-Qa'ida, he was involved with the crimes against humanity of 11 September.
Others still have argued that there may be some links between Iraq andterrorist organisations with global links such as Al-Qa'ida.
He said yesterday that al-Qa'ida had not only survived the six-year onslaught, but possessed momentum.
The direct result of his policies has created the best possible recruiting ground al-Qa'ida could ever have asked for.
As has been pointed out by other speakers, the only American al-Qa'ida member so far captured is to be tried in a court in Virginia with full legal representation!
Last week in Taba innocent Israeli holidaymakers were killed by a bomb attack which has all the hallmarks of al-Qa'ida.
The IRA is different from ETA,which is different from al-Qa'ida, but they are all evil and must be faced down and eliminated.
In Afghanistan, the military occupation has generated exponential growth in the production of opium,which is funding the al-Qa'ida network.
They are allegedly associated with the terrorist group al-Qa'ida and with the five people arrested last year found in possession of maps which marked out the Parliament buildings in Strasbourg and the Cathedral.
The USA, along with its allies, most notably the UK,launched a successful attack to displace al-Qa'ida from its stronghold.
Reports earlier yesterday said Bin Laden had sent a directive to al-Qa'ida affiliates and partners that he wanted a Mumbai-style attack on at least three European countries- Britain, Germany and France.
There must of course be evidence, to which we all have access, of the existence of weapons of mass destruction andpossible collaboration with al-Qa'ida.
To listen to some of those with a professional hatred of the United States, one would imagine that, in their view,the Taliban and al-Qa'ida are a species of freedom fighter who wish to help poor and oppressed peoples.
Is there agreement about the policy, and does this include demands for a UN mandate andfor clear evidence of Saddam Hussein's possible involvement in the attack on the World Trade Centre or collaboration with al-Qa'ida?
Pakistan is also not fully cooperating with ISAF,allowing it to enter the tribal areas of the north-west frontier region where al-Qa'ida is currently regrouping to threaten Afghanistan's government and civil society.
One day, somebody will write the story of Europe's fight against terrorism and they will pick on this, together with the serious mistake we made this morning in adopting the Fava report,which is a huge gift to al-Qa'ida.
The fact that al-Qa'ida cells still exist in at least 40 countries, according to the UN report that I mentioned earlier, also reminds us that terrorist networks are drawing their resources from the troubled waters of the international financial market.
Refugees coming to the West who are terrorist sympathisers orhave been active with the Taliban or al-Qa'ida must be sent back to face the music.
The recent campaign in Waziristan shows Islamabad's intent to prosecute a war against al-Qa'ida strongholds in tribal areas, historically no-go areas for the government of President Musharraf, who has now pressured tribal leaders to hunt down Islamist militants.
Being unclear helps no one and I simply do not understand why some in this House do not want the use of the term"fundamental Islamist organisations" to describe al-Qa'ida and their ilk.
Although much reduced in size, al-Qa'ida is still an external threat from hiding places in the regions bordering Afghanistan. Internally, the fact that warlords clearly continue to operate, are still behind the cultivation of opium poppies and are in a position to threaten the stability of Afghanistan is necessarily a source of concern.
Mr President, we all remember why Afghanistan was invaded in the first place:it followed the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the USA, masterminded by al-Qa'ida from bases in Afghanistan under the protection of the Taliban.
Be it the IRA fire-bombing a packedhotel outside Belfast and incinerating a dozen innocent people, al-Qa'ida attacking the twin towers, or Chechen extremists in Beslan butchering innocent children, the strategy is the same- maximum impact through maximum carnage in the hope of extracting maximum political concession.
The government has used the tragic events of 11 September as an excuse for a crackdown on peaceful democratic opponents of the current regime who have no connections with either al-Qa'ida or any terrorist or fundamentalist groups.
Mr President, a year has now passed since the tragic 9/11 events which triggered the war against Afghanistan, now mercifully in a mopping-up phase to search out anddestroy remnants of the odious Taliban regime and their al-Qa'ida terrorist allies.
Mr President, September 11, the attacks on the twin towers in New York, opened up a new chapter in the concept of war- namely, an asymmetric, large-scale attack by a well-organised and well-resourced, fanatic, international,Islamist grouping affiliated to al-Qa'ida, with no respect for the traditional rules and conduct of war as we know them and very difficult to formally classify under the Third and Fourth Geneva Protocols of 1949.