Examples of using Current scheme in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
What does the current scheme provide for?
The law will reduce chain migration and replace the current scheme.
The current scheme was adopted in 2008 under the consultation procedure.
Most member states are already seeking to improve their current schemes on this issue.
The current scheme was established by Regulation No 732/2008 as from 1 January 2009.
Option 1: introducing the term'traditional' as optional reserved term under marketing standards and abolishing the current scheme.
Option 3: simplifying the current scheme and allow only registration with reservation of the name.
Changes considered could only be of administrative/ institutional nature, in order tojust make the current scheme run better.
The current schemes for supporting open innovation and user-driven innovation projects are still at an initial phase.
Roughly 75% of land in Ireland has been designated as disadvantaged areas, and the current scheme provides aid to roughly 100 000 farming families.
As the current scheme expires on 31 December of this year, the Commission already presented a new proposal back in May 2010.
Following intensive negotiations, the Council reached a political agreement on 15 December 2011 on the continuation of the current scheme up to 2013.
Option 2: abolishing the current scheme, traditional products managed in national or private schemes. .
Given that the consulting authority has not specified reasons for the extreme urgency, except that the current scheme expires on 30 April 2010.
In the light of the above, the current scheme whereby the aid is granted to ginning undertakings for the quantity they produce should be maintained.
The new aid scheme should take account of the experience andproblems encountered in applying the current scheme governed by Decision No 3632/93/ECSC.
The current schemes operate within different legal and financial frameworks, and have some important differences in their design and functioning.
As to international data transfers, many organisations considered that the current schemes are not entirely satisfactory and need to be reviewed and streamlined so as to make transfers simpler and less burdensome.
As the current schemes have developed independently and in different time periods, there is a lack of coordination and consistency between them, even though they pursue similar objectives and target groups.
For the mechanism of Article 13(2) in Regulation(EC) No 509/2006, registration of names with reservation of the name:Option 3 simplifying the current scheme and allow only registration with reservation of the name.
The impact assessment shows that the current scheme is unable to achieve its objectives as it suffers from low awareness of the label and low uptake by industry resulting amongst others from excessively bureaucratic processes and management.
For the mechanism of Article 13(1) in Regulation(EC) No 509/2006, registration of names without reservation of the name:Option 2 abolishing the current scheme, traditional products managed in national or private schemes. .
The current scheme allows ginning undertakings to fix that amount, in their aid applications, on the basis, in particular, of the date of conclusion of sales contracts for the ginned cotton in their possession.
While certain key features need to be harmonised at EU level(targeted sectors, level of ambition and counting methods),Member States should have the possibility to adjust the schemes to their national circumstances or retain their current schemes, to a large degree.
This means that current schemes such as the EU's Strategic Energy Technology(SET) Plan and the Intelligent Energy in Europe(IEE) programme will need to be streamlined along increased innovation chain integration and coordination.
Option 1(introducing the term'traditional' as optional reserved term under marketing standards and abolishing the current scheme) success would by large depend on definition of the reserved term but also on the operators' interest to use it on the labels.
The current scheme adopted by Council Regulation(EC) No 1587/98 recognises that the difficulties facing the fishery industry of the European Union are aggravated in particular by the cost of transporting fishery products to markets as a result of the remoteness and isolation of the outermost regions.
Apublic consultation during the year on future adaptations of this system was accompanied by a proposal to roll over the current scheme for up to two years to allow the European Parliament sufficient time to examine the new proposal to be tabled by the Commission early in 2011.
In the fisheries sector, on 4 September the Commission proposed extending, until 31 December 2002, the scheme introduced by Regulation(EC)No 1587/98 to compensate for the additional costs incurred in the marketing of certain products(Table II), pending the report on the application of the current scheme and the proposal for the new scheme to replace it.
The ESC applauds the Commission's intention to simplify the current scheme, bringing together in a single Council Regulation the general principles of Protocol 4 annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece and provisions in support of cotton production.