Examples of using Difference logic in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
The difference logic seems, in general, to fulfil the otherness like ideally.
Since today we have two global directions,which are exclusively built on the difference logic.
This difference logic reveals however a particularity, which we have already mentioned from the beginning as being in relation with the identity logic. .
This is the medium in which the movement of the identity logic to the difference logic was going on.
Besides the difference logic and the global individualism, it is the globalization itself, that reorganizes the problems of the other and of the otherness.
Especially because of the activity and efficiency of these both big spiritual schools, the difference logic got the supremacy.
A difference logic without any movement direction towards the identity logic developed on ecumenical values has a peculiar, partly as unexplored valid quality.
It is about that changement of form of the whole discourse of the interculturality, that opens into a difference logic.
His already mentioned new art of instrumentalizing of the identity- and difference logic joins in this concept this positive side.
However, this difference logic of the global individualism produces, on a blow, a whole range of critical new problems, because of the lack of every type dimension.
It is not about the fact, that we intended easily to label the difference logic with the suspicion of having provoked the global individualism.
The difference logic without class values would be an ideal solution, if it might be in this context about an optimal verbal solution and not about conflictous real processes.
This leads, only apparently unexpectedly, to the fact that a difference logic is also actually realized, what seems to personify as optimally the result of the whole process.
The difference logic without any generic values would be an ideal solution, if it was in this context about an optimal verbal solution and not about conflictuous real processes.
This leads, apparently only in an unexpected way, to the fact, that the difference logic is also effectively realized, what the result of the whole process seems to personify optimally.
These are namely just the areas on account of which an end of the philosophy emerges, which mark in both global directions, each time in a different way,the transition from an identity logic into a difference logic.
It is not about the fact that we wanted to provide the difference logic without any further stipulations with the suspicion, to have produced the global individualism real-causally.
While we had to talk at the beginning about the possibility of an identity logic without any type background,it becomes at this point inevitable to speak about a difference logic without any background of ecumenical values.
It is this difference logic, that is manifesting in numerous phenomena of the modern individualization, and it is also this difference logic, that determines the public questioning of the other, of the otherness and of the interculturality.
This negative character of the specifically post-modern stipulation of the philosophical notion building has been already realized in the sign of the conversion(as always also done in detail)from the identity logic into a difference logic not yet known some time ago.
And it is this difference logic, which is itself materially manifested in the numerous phenomena of the modern individuation, it is however this difference logic which largely determines the question of the other, the otherness and the interculturalism.
Feuerbach's masterful criticism of philosophical,ideological and theological attitudes with the help of an identity- and difference logic is- again in this perspective- another, renewed variant of the specifically enlightened criticism of all philosophies, ideologies and theologies in the eighteenth century.
The individual of the by civilisations constituted universe can certainly renounce a genre-oriented spring of his retarded society, while thesame individual has a quite strong chance as"global" individual to be admitted through difference logic and global individualization in the desired society.
The paradox andthe historically new is that the practice removed by the radical difference logic adopts new forms, it is a deconstructive practice, which is coupled with the difference logic differently than a constructive practice with the Identity logic. .
The individual of the in terms of civilization catching up universe can on a type oriented jump with big certainty renounce his behind remainingsociety, while the same individual has absolutely strong chance as a"global" individual to be accepted through difference logic and global individuation in the desired society.
The process of individuation,even a motive and result of the transformation of the identity logic into the difference logic, modifies as invisible, nevertheless extensive assumption every relation, like that betwwen society and community, community and community, community and individual, individual and individual.
The difference logic is a false victory, which grants the same chance and the same rank, certainly, to every involved side, but which, in the most true sense of the word, is counterproductive and a cul-de-sac, because it confirms the other and the otherness without wanting to achieve a differentiated identity from both poles of the otherness on the basis of common value settlements.
The global process of the individuation,even a motive and a result of the conversion of the identity logic into the difference logic, as invisible, nevertheless global hypothesis, changes every fundamental relation, like between society and community, community and community, community and individual, individual and individual.
It is a new fundamental question issued from the basic problematic, of how it was quite possible,that these post-modern structures of thinking could be viable in their difference logic and in their inability to admit and articulate the usual questions of the social reproduction, precisely at the time of the globalization, for- simply said- a post-modern value orientation can expressly prevent the everyday consciousness from recognizing the global world of life in its abstractions and fragmentation.