Examples of using Differences between member states in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Differences between Member States.
This is a motivation for the fact that there are big differences between Member States.
There are large differences between Member States concerning prevention of corruption.
The Committee agrees that financing of thereal economy has improved considerably, although differences between Member States persist.
Differences between Member States are considerably larger than those between markets.
However, as regards overall growth and employment, impact differences between Member States need to be taken into account.
These differences between Member States can be explained by the existence or not of adequate legislations.
(21) Progressive market opening towards fullcompetition should as soon as possible remove differences between Member States.
Differences between Member States are even more marked than in the actual procedure for granting international protection.
This option would not create a level playing field,and the situation may even deteriorate since differences between Member States could increase.
Are there pronounced differences between Member States and do students in the European schools have distinctively different attitudes?
Of the committed amounts, EUR 1,5 billion(11%)was already disbursed to final recipients with substantially differences between Member States.
Recalls that evidence shows major differences between Member States and room for improvement in terms of redress mechanisms;
The methodology often differs, making it impossible to compare them,or to identify differences between Member States or changes.
However, there are differences between Member States as regards availability and affordability of fixed broadband across urban and rural areas.
The crisis has not affected all Member States to the same extent nor with the same intensity andhas exacerbated the differences between Member States.
There were significant differences between Member States, depending on their national policies, maternal and parental leave systems, traditions and values.
As a Recommendation on how to interpret rules laid down inDirectives is not binding in nature, differences between Member States are likely to persist.
Given the differences between Member States, the right approach will inevitably vary from country to country, whilst nevertheless remaining part of a common, integrated approach.
(1) How to define comparable security of supply standards that put equal,reasonable burden on market players while respecting the differences between Member States?
There are differences between Member States as regards the range of the procedures available to debtors in financial difficulties in order to restructure their business.
It states that that principle is established although, in fact, there are differences between Member States, a point which was known when Regulation No 44/2001 was adopted and still applies today.
The EESC recognises that there may be differences between Member States in terms of conditions related to research professions but emphasises that there should be a concerted cross European effort to address this issue.
That success of rail transport should only be dependent on investments andinfrastructure charges is not true, differences between Member States can also be explained by other factors, and market governance is one of them.
The EESC understands that there are differences between Member States and recognises the importance of enabling them to set the age ceiling in line with their respective needs and possibilities.
Although IP 9(ii) is a helpful innovation,the ESIF are currently managed in a way that ignores differences between Member States in the current situation of the Roma population.
The EESC fully agrees with the view that the differences between Member States have to be taken into account to ensure both fairness and cost-effectiveness.
With regard to effort sharing,the EESC fully agrees with the view that differences between Member States have to be taken into account to ensure fairness and cost-effectiveness.
In Europe,the Stress Tests have confirmed that there are continued differences between Member States in ensuring comprehensive and transparent identification and management of key safety issues.
This approach is undoubtedly justified by the principles of subsidiarity andproportionality, but differences between Member States are often so great that the effectiveness of the directives suffers as a result.