Examples of using Interventions were made in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Interventions were made by representatives of two Parties.
In the ensuing discussion, a number of interventions were made and questions raised.
Interventions were made by 16 delegations, including 3 groups.
In order to overcome those challenges, it was important to cooperate to ensure that interventions were made in the areas where they were needed.
Various interventions were made in support of such an exclusion.
During public plenary meetings of the fifty-seventh session of the Sub-Commission, a total of 1,699 interventions were made, amounting to 49 hours 28 minutes.
Various interventions were made with respect to subparagraph(2)(b)v.
An interactive dialogue with the panellists ensued, during which interventions were made by the representatives of Namibia, Canada, Australia, China, Estonia, Mongolia and Gabon.
Interventions were made by the representatives of Uganda, Ethiopia and Chile, as well as by the observers for Mexico and the Holy See.
Regarding the drafting techniques that might be used in the preparation of the draft legislative guide, interventions were made pointing out the usefulness of sample provisions for the purpose of illustrating possible legislative solutions for the issues dealt with in the guide.
Interventions were made by the representatives of Jamaica and Nicaragua and the observers for the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and Botswana.
Some strategic interventions were made to reach this objective.
Interventions were made by 18 Parties to propose changes to the draft decisions contained in the documents referred to in paragraph 26 above.
At the same meeting, interventions were made by the representatives of WMO and WHO.
Interventions were made on the subjects of detention, torture, women, racism, development, colonization, and the work of the Subcommission.
A total of 42 interventions were made by national delegations, non-governmental organizations and members of the corporate sector.
Interventions were made by the representatives of Australia and Ireland, the observer for Iraq and the representative of the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF.
Most of these interventions were made jointly with the Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression.
Interventions were made by the representatives of India, South Africa, Australia, Nigeria, Belgium, Pakistan, Poland, Canada, Indonesia and Mexico and the observer for Finland.
Several interventions were made by civil society, as well as the International Committee of the Red Cross.
Various interventions were made in favour of giving the foreign representative that right without requiring prior recognition.
Some interventions were made in collaboration with other non-governmental organizations, for instance, on Guatemala, Mexico(Chiapas), Colombia and Turkey.
Targeted interventions were made to improve refugee girls' enrolment and retention at school, for example by increasing the number of female teachers.
Interventions were made by the representatives of Austria, Bangladesh, Azerbaijan, Malaysia and China, and by the representatives of the International Organization for Migration(IOM) and UNESCO.
Interventions were made by the representatives of Spain, Sri Lanka, Nigeria and Costa Rica and the representative of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Interventions were made to suggest that the right to request the opening of insolvency proceedings should not be extended to a representative in a foreign non-main proceeding.
Legal interventions were made in a number of asylum countries as well as at the European Court of Human Rights on some critical issues relating to the interpretation of refugee criteria.
Various interventions were made enquiring about the meaning of the phrase"assets falling under the authority of the foreign representative", which was found to be unclear.
Various interventions were made in favour of limiting those requirements to providing notice of the recognition of the foreign proceeding and of the effects of that recognition, if required by local law.
Additional interventions were made by the NHRIs of India(right to development) and Morocco(enforced disappearances) and the NHRIs of India, Morocco and Mexico universal periodic review mechanism.