Examples of using Questions had been asked in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Several questions had been asked regarding censorship.
It was hard to judge how aware successive Governments of the Cayman Islands had been with regard to other options-- the electorate certainly had had little or no idea about what could be sought from the United Kingdom Government-- but in any event no questions had been asked and so the United Kingdom, for its part, had not volunteered any information.
Questions had been asked about the reorganization of the judiciary.
Ms. Dumbraveanu(Moldova) explained that the Complaints Committee, about which questions had been asked, had been set up to review complaints lodged by persons in detention.
Questions had been asked about Lebanese detainees in Syria.
This objection was not admissible because the questions had been asked in the framework of the review provided for by Article 19 of the Convention rather than Article 22.
Questions had been asked about the solitary confinement of young persons.
During the examination of the second Japanese periodic report, questions had been asked about the remedies available to the mentally ill and it had been admitted that discrimination against such persons still existed.
Questions had been asked regarding freedom of association and the right to organize.
With regard to freedom of expression, some questions had been asked concerning the composition and competence of the Macau Press Council referred to during the consideration of the previous report item 17 of the list of issues.
Questions had been asked about the confirmation of judges' appointments every seven years.
Questions had been asked about the status of the National Human Rights Observatory.
Several questions had been asked about the penalties for officials who violated the law.
Questions had been asked about the Government's measures to remedy the food shortage.
Questions had been asked about administrative detention and legislation on crime prevention.
Questions had been asked about the membership of the assize courts trying cases involving terrorism.
Questions had been asked about preventive custody or administrative detention measures.
Questions had been asked about the many cases of capital punishment in the period 2000-2001.
Questions had been asked about the efficacy of temporary special measures to combat discrimination in the workplace.
Questions had been asked about the federal structure and whether it promoted or obstructed respect for human rights.
Questions had been asked about the National Human Rights Observatory, especially its independence.
Questions had been asked concerning the right to a fair trial and the impunity of perpetrators of human rights violations.
Questions had been asked about the articles of the Constitution concerning international instruments, and in particular the human rights instruments.
Questions had been asked about the way in which human rights violations were dealt with and whether victims of such violations had a right to compensation.
Questions had been asked concerning the fact that Hun Sen had received Khieu Sampan and Nuon Chea at his place as if they had been friends.
Questions had been asked on the subject of torture, in particular to ascertain why torture was not classified as an offence under Italian criminal law.
Similarly, questions had been asked about the Berber dialects, of which there were five and which were still more or less used according to the region concerned.
Questions had been asked regarding freedom of expression and the banning of three newspapers, the Guardian, Punch and Concord(CCPR/C/92/Add.1, para. 153) under decrees promulgated in 1994.
Questions had been asked as to whether that approach would cast doubt on the applicability of the draft articles to major law-making conventions to which international organizations also happened to be parties.
Mr. ANDO said questions had been asked regarding the mandatory provision of defence counsel for arrested persons and detainees, specifically with respect to who paid for the defence counsel at the investigation stage, and whether the State paid only at the trial stage.