Examples of using To procedural order in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In its response to Procedural Order 1, Iraq asserted that it had returned various books to Kuwait.
The asserted Amounts Liquidated presented in table 4 above are those submitted in the response to Procedural Order 64.
Iraq's responses to Procedural Order 1 frequently assert that it should not be held responsible for property losses caused by.
All responses to the requests for information and documentation and to Procedural Order No. 2 have been considered by the Panel.
In its response to Procedural Order 16, the Government of Kuwait submitted information relating to the activities of the London office.
The views and comments of Iraq presented in its written responses to Procedural Order Nos. 2 and 3 have been duly taken into account by the Panel.
Iraq's responses to Procedural Order 1 frequently assert that it should not be held responsible for property losses caused by.
The views and comments of Saudi Arabia andJapan presented in their responses to Procedural Order Nos. 4 and 5, respectively, have been duly taken into consideration by the Panel.
In its response to Procedural Order 49, MoD provided documentation showing that MoD had originally overstated the historic cost of the guns.
Iraq referred to the existence of an agreement along the lines of that set out above in its responses to Procedural Order 1 for the Ministry of Defense claim UNCC Claim No. 5000192.
Cviii In its response to Procedural Order 9, MoD specifically withdrew its claim for amounts paid to bedoun“Special Contractors”.
These requests took the form of procedural orders, andother requests issued pursuant to procedural orders, of which to date some 100 have been issued.
In its response to Procedural Order 16, the Government of Kuwait submitted information relating to the type of news that was distributed during this period.
These requests took the form of procedural orders, andother requests issued pursuant to procedural orders, of which some 30 were issued in respect of the third instalment part two claims.
In its response to Procedural Order 8, issued in October 2000, NG disclosed that its claim overstated the amount of the relief paid to employees.
Turner International Industries, Inc. had been submitted previously to the Panel of Commissioners reviewing"E3" claims andwas transferred to this instalment pursuant to Procedural Order No. 44A dated 5 October 2001.
These were forwarded to Iraq pursuant to Procedural Order 1 issued in respect of each claim on 14 September 1999.
In response to Procedural Order No. 53, issued in June 2001, PAH stated that it was unable to ascertain that there was no duplication.
These requests took the form of notifications issued by the secretariat under article 34 of the Rules(“article 34 notifications”), procedural orders, andother requests issued pursuant to procedural orders, of which some 23 were issued in respect of the third instalment part three claims six article 34 notifications and 17 procedural orders. .
In response to Procedural Order No. 46, issued in April 2001, PAH identified an overstatement for which the Panel has made an additional adjustment.[ccxi]/.
The Panel has duly considered Iraq's argument in its response to Procedural Order 1 that it was unfair for a"belligerent" to act as contractor to the Government.
In its response to Procedural Order 36 issued in January 2000, the Government stated that it did not have evidence to support this excess and the Panel has made the appropriate adjustment.
These were forwarded to Iraq pursuant to Procedural Order Nos. 2 and 3 issued in respect of the claims on 21 September 2000.
In its response to Procedural Order 1 issued in respect of this claim, Iraq states that 18 of the names on the list of 625 were, in fact,"repeated names"./.
The Panel notes,following Iraq's response to Procedural Order 1, that various items were returned through UNROP, but finds that MoO has not made a claim for any of the items concerned.
In its response to Procedural Order 1, Iraq asserted that complete inventories and records did exist which show the extent of supplies and equipment at KU as at 2 August 1990.
Iraq submitted, in its response to Procedural Order 1, that there was only one mosque in an area in respect of which the Government of Kuwait asserts there were two mosques which had been destroyed.
In its response to Procedural Order 16, KUNA stated that 62 of the 184 new employees were of a lower skill level and should therefore be excluded from the claim for hiring costs.
In its response to Procedural Order 1, Iraq stated that the article archive was returned to the Government of Kuwait pursuant to the United Nations Return of Property("UNROP") programme.
In its response to Procedural Order 46 issued in May 2000, the Government stated that the amount claimed for the boats was, in fact, duplicated by the claim of the Ministry of Interior considered at paragraphs to. .