Examples of using Differences in treatment in English and their translations into Slovenian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Official/political
-
Programming
Are there differences in treatment for men and women?
I am thinking of the area of'objectively justified' differences in treatment.
Differences in treatment based on nationality are also not covered.
Certain contributors consider that itis the right response to the problems of management and differences in treatment that exist today.
Such differences in treatment do not exist for other forms of transport such as road, rail and air.
The Employment Equality Directive givesexamples of whatmight, in certain circumstances, amount to legitimate differences in treatment.
Differences in treatment should be related to the actual cost of the facilities and services provided.
Monitoring full and equal access to healthcare,identifying cases of institutional discrimination and publicising negative differences in treatment.
Differences in treatment shall only be justified by objective characteristics of the matter in question.
I have no quarrel with these, obviously, but these objectively justified differences in treatment must not be allowed to metamorphose directly or indirectly into discrimination.
What differences in treatment between men and women has the Council identified in respect of gainful employment?
As a general rule, I particularly appreciate the fact that the European Union is composed of States with diverse and varied national cultures and traditions, but when it comes to violence,I am appalled to see the differences in treatment that exist.
This precludes differences in treatment of nationals who are in comparable situations, unless that difference is objectively justified.
Only the elements that are necessary to ensure that the scheme functions properly andto prevent distortions of competition which could result from differences in treatment of aircraft operators between Member States are regulated by the proposal.
The differences in treatment authorised by Article 65(1)(a) TFEU must therefore be distinguished from discrimination prohibited by Article 65(3) TFEU.
(FR) Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, with this excellent report by Mrs Lulling,the European Parliament is trying to reduce still further the differences in treatment between men and women in the workplace, and I welcome this move.
Secondly, they allow differences in treatment where the nature of the employment activity may genuinely require the person carrying them out to be of a certain ethnic origin, religion or age etc.
Bearing in mind that some people live a long way from urban or tourist centres, the Committee calls on the Commission and Member States to make sure that the initiatives theyundertake do not lead to discrimination and differences in treatment.
The Commission underlines that differences in treatment whereby agency workers enjoy less favourable conditions than workers employed by the user undertaking should remain exceptional.
Calls on the Member States to take the steps required to reverse the burden of proof, ensuring that it willalways be the employer who has to prove that such differences in treatment as might have been found to exist have not resulted in any discrimination;
I would stress our concern that differences in treatment between areas of activity be eliminated, in the face of well known developments at the levels of both organisation and of tools and mechanisms of work or production.
By attempting to establish differences between European workers and third-country workers, this adds to the segregation of immigrant workers,widening differences in treatment and further weakening their living conditions through the vulnerability and instability of their working conditions.
However, differences in treatment in connection with age may be justified under certain circumstances and therefore require specific provisions which may vary in accordance with the situation in Member States.
However, that provision has not been fully effective in combatting discrimination and it has not sufficiently reduced legal uncertainty,particularly because of the possibility to justify the differences in treatment for which it allows and the corresponding difficulties in enforcing it in practice.
Thus, it distinguishes between‘differences in treatment which are justified, in particular by legitimate employment policy, labour market and vocational training ob-jectives, and discrimination which must be prohibited'.
As is clear from the judgment in Cadbury Schweppes and Cadbury Schweppes Overseas, 30this prohibition of discriminatorymeasures is not only aimed at differences in treatment between a resident taxpayer who invests in his State of residence and a resident taxpayer who invests in another Member State.
By attempting to establish disparities and differences in treatment between European workers and third-country workers, this proposal for a directive increases the segregation of immigrant workers and further weakens the situation for all workers, forcing them into a situation of greater instability.
Article 4(5)of the Directive provides that the Directive shall not preclude differences in treatment if the provision of goods and services exclusively or primarily to members of one sex is justified by a legitimate aim and the means of achieving it are appropriate and necessary.
The principle of equaltreatment is not breached provided that differences in treatment between different categories of officials are justified on the basis of objective and reasonable criteria and that the differences are proportionate to the aim pursued by the differential treatment in question.
The proposed directiveshould allow Member States to permit differences in treatment only if they require providers of financial services to publish up- to-date actuarial or statistical data relevant to the particular"risk" activity, for example driving, travel, mortgage repayment, and to the age group or to the particular disability concerned.