Examples of using Continuous infringement in English and their translations into Swedish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Political
The existence of a single and continuous infringement.
For both types of conduct, the General Court's only argument regarding the substantial nature of the effect in the internal market is that they formed part of a single and continuous infringement.
In the present instance, the concept of a single and continuous infringement has been inserted into a wholly different context.
the General Court stated that the exclusivity rebates formed part of a single and continuous infringement.
Without the assistance of the concept of single and continuous infringement, the Commission would have to meet a higher evidentiary threshold.
does not establish the existence of a single and continuous infringement.
By contrast, recourse to the concept of a single and continuous infringement does not- and cannot- extend the
it has not shown that that conduct constituted a single and continuous infringement.
In such circumstances it would be more natural to speak about the same continuous infringement than two separate infringements. .
taken together, form a single and continuous infringement.
Fundamentally, as the appellant observes, recourse to the concept of a single and continuous infringement cannot convert lawful conduct into an infringement. .
The principles of the concept of a single and continuous infringement established in the caselaw were analysed at points 164 to 166 of the statement of objections and recapitulated at recitals 145 to 148 to the Decision.
However, it is at recitals 150 to 154 to the Decision that the Commission sets out the grounds of its new reasoning relating to the application of the principle of single and continuous infringement to the present case.
179 et seq. above, the concept of single and continuous infringement is merely a procedural rule aimed at alleviating the evidentiary burden of competition authorities.
the Commission concluded that each of the two cartels constituted a single continuous infringement of Article 81(1) EC.
This is because the findings of the General Court regarding the existence of a single and continuous infringement constitute the basis for a finding of an infringement for the years 2006 and 2007.
the Commission erred in law in characterising the applicants' actions as a single and continuous infringement.
Hence, the crux of the present ground of appeal lies in defining the role of the concept of single and continuous infringement in assessing the capability of a single undertaking's conduct to restrict competition.
that problem cannot be remedied by applying the concept of a single and continuous infringement.
In the alternative, the Commission acknowledges that if the applicants' activities had not formed part of a single and continuous infringement, UBC would have received a reduction of at least 75% of its fine.
Has committed a single and continuous infringement of Article 82[EC]
concerted practices penalised by the Commission in the Decision as a single and continuous infringement are complementary in the way described at paragraph 179 above.
under the heading‘The concept of single and continuous infringement- Principles',
European arrangements constituted a single and continuous infringement(see paragraph 35 above), there is no longer any need to adjudicate on that plea.
in the context of a single and continuous infringement based on an overall strategy of foreclosure,
European arrangements as a single and continuous infringement.
As regards what is alleged to be the incorrect application of the concept of a single and continuous infringement, the Commission rejects the argument based on the difference between the participants in the two cartels see paragraph 134 above.
Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area- Fines- Deterrence- Repeated infringement- Cooperation during the administrative procedure- Single and continuous infringement.
In that context, the Commission argues that market coverage during those two years should be seen in the light of a single and continuous infringement which relates to the existence of an overall strategy to foreclose AMD from the worldwide market for CPUs.
it merely bundled them together with conduct which took place in the European Union into a single and continuous infringement the effect of which was,