在 中文 中使用 卡斯尔斯 的示例及其翻译为 英语
{-}
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Programming
审议卡斯尔斯的批评.
卡斯尔斯先生认为这个数字应为60％至65％。
人类发展报告处对卡斯尔斯先生会议室文件的回应.
Response of the Human Development Report Office to Mr. Castles' room document.卡斯尔斯报告主张彻底改变方案的概念目标。
The Castles report advocates an about face in the conceptual target of the Programme.在以下各段我们将逐项评估卡斯尔斯先生的批评。
In the following paragraphs wewill make our assessment of each of the criticisms made by Mr. Castles.在卡斯尔斯报告中，这些支出称为"抗比较因素"。
In the Castles report, these expenditures are referred to as“comparison resistant”.国内生产总值的范围问题是卡斯尔斯报告和本报告有分歧的问题。
The issue of GDPcoverage is one on which there are differences between the Castles report and this report.卡斯尔斯报告依据购买力平价出版物按经合发组织不同主管职位举了例子。
The Castles report gives examples based on the publication of PPPs by distinct directorates in OECD.我们的职权范围是专门针对卡斯尔斯先生对《1999人类发展报告》所作的批评。
Our terms of reference relate specifically to the criticisms made by Mr. Castles of the 1999 HDR.卡斯尔斯先生说的是表6底下按国家类别开列的人均国内总产值数字。
Mr. Castles is referring to the per capita GDP figures given for groups of countries at the foot of table 6.该会议由德克·范·德卡先生(荷兰)担任主席,斯蒂芬·卡斯尔斯先生(澳大利亚)担任报告员。
The Symposium was chaired by Dirk van de Kaa(Netherlands)and Stephen Castles(Australia) served as Rapporteur.五、卡斯尔斯报告的建议和本报告的建议的差异66－7232.
Differences between the recommendations in the Castles report and in this report Agreements Differences of opinion.虽然结果一般不像卡斯尔斯先生所选择的日本/中国的比较那样突出，但基本情况是明显的。
While the results are not, in general,as striking as for the Japan/China comparison chosen by Mr. Castles, the pattern is clear.卡斯尔斯先生认为这些数字应为1960年约12比1，1990年约18比1，1997年约16比1。
Mr. Castles contends that these figures should be about 12:1 in 1960, 18:1 in 1990 and 16:1 in 1997.人类发展报告处和卡斯尔斯先生都似乎过分强调与某项假设所预测的行为不符的个别事例。
Both HDRO and Mr. Castles seem to be putting too much emphasis on individual cases which do not conform to behaviours predicted by a hypothesis.卡斯尔斯报告中的情况与按价格或部分基础分组的量处理各国的排序有关系。
The case in the Castles report had to do with the ranking of countries by either price or volume for selected basic headings.下文给出的压缩版本旨在突出卡斯尔斯报告中没有涉及的问题并提及观点的差异。
The condensed version set out below is designed tohighlight issues that are not covered in the Castles report and to mention the differences in points of view.卡斯尔斯报告在下列问题上保持沉默,无疑是因为它们对方案的经合发组织部分不那么重要。
The Castles report is silent on the following matters no doubt because they are of less consequence for the OECD segment of the Programme.如人类发展报告处的回应所述，卡斯尔斯先生从技术上说是正确的，但人类发展报告处提供了令人信服的证据证明，他们推断的不均的方向是有充分根据的。
As the HDRO response indicates, Mr. Castles is technically correct, but HRDO provides convincing evidence that their inferred direction of inequality is well founded.虽然卡斯尔斯先生没有指出，但我们注意到，正文和附表（表6）应该但并非涵盖相同的期间。
Although not raised by Mr. Castles, we note that the text and the supporting table(table 6) do not but should cover the same time periods.本小组被要求编写一份报告。说明《人类发展报告》中的统计资料的准确性，并集中讨论卡斯尔斯先生所撰写的会议室文件中提出的问题。
Our group was asked to prepare a report on the accuracy of the statistical information in the HDR,focusing on the points raised 由于卡斯尔斯报告已发表将近一年,本报告有时提到其中得出的结论和提出的建议。
Because the Castles report has been around for the best part of one year, there are references in this report to the conclusions and recommendations reached in it.(d)经合发组织地区也普遍存在着类似情况,卡斯尔斯报告指出为三个地区(基础分组的总量)提供的结果受到严重质疑。
(d) A similar situation prevails in the OECD area,where the Castles report has pointed out three areas(aggregates of basic headings) where the results provided are open to serious challenge.卡斯尔斯先生在会议室文件（附录一）内所作的批评是在《人类发展报告》、人类发展指数和各项有关指数的框架内作出的。
The criticisms of Mr. Castles in the room document(appendix I) are made within the framework 这是人类发展报告处和卡斯尔斯先生之间的差别很重要的一方面，因此我们在本节先讨论它，然后才在以后各节考虑他的每项具体批评。
This is such an important aspect of the difference between HDRO and Mr. Castles that we will devote the present section to it before considering each of his specific criticisms in the subsequent sections.虽然卡斯尔斯先生在会议室文件中并未明确指出，但他的主要批评是选用美元汇率，而不是以购买力平价为转换因数。
Although Mr. Castles does not say so explicitly in the room document, his basic criticism is the choice of US dollar exchange rate rather than PPP as the conversion factor.卡斯尔斯报告审议了谁应对购买力平价方案的结果负责,并主张应由主管国际比较方案的国际机构负完全责任。
The Castles report considers who should be responsible for the results of the PPP Programme, and advocates that it be exclusively the international agencies concerned with ICP.卡斯尔斯先生的其他各点与对人类发展指数的理解和它与各个组成部分的统计资料的关系有关，因此可能不属于我们的任务范围。
As for Mr. Castles' other points, they relate to the interpretation of the HDI and its relationship to the component statistics, and may therefore lie outside our mandate.在卡斯尔斯先生提出的一些最重要的批评的中心，是如何对每个国家编制的经济统计进行国际比较的基本问题。
At the heart of some of the most important criticisms made by Mr. Castles is the basic question of how to make international comparisons of economic statistics that have been produced for each country.
