The State party thus violated article 9, paragraph 1.
Reporting Title IX violations is not difficult.他宣称,这种做法构成了违反第九条第3款第十四条第3款(丙)项的行为。
He claims that this constitutes a violation of article 9, paragraph 3 and article 14, paragraph 3(c).他认为,监禁他相当于违反第九条、第十四条第2款和第十九条。
He argues that his imprisonment would amount to a violation of article 9, article 14, paragraph 2 and article 19.提交人声称违反第九条第2款,因为没有告知他逮捕或对他的指控原因。
The author claims a violation of article 9, paragraph 2, as he was arrested without being informed of the reasons for his arrest or the charges against him.Combinations with other parts of speech
缔约国还认为,来文没有说明发生违反第九条第2至第4款的情况。
The State party alsosubmits that the communication does not reveal a violation of article 9, paragraphs 2 to 4.因此,提交人认为,Idriss和JumaAboufaied都是缔约国违反第九条第3款的受害者。
The author therefore contends that both Idriss andJuma Aboufaied were victims of a violation of article 9, paragraph 3.此外,据我所知,委员会从未裁定过像这样的拘禁三天即构成违反第九条第三款。
Furthermore, as far as I remember, the Committee has never decided that the detention for three days, as such,constitutes a violation of article 9, paragraph 3.委员会认定它所了解的事实反映出违反第九条第3款的行为。
The Committee concludes that the facts before it disclose a violation of article 9, paragraph 3.由于缔约国未能就此提供令人满意的解释,委员会认定,就DjaafarSahbi而论,存在违反第九条的情况。
In the absence of satisfactory explanations from the State party,the Committee finds a violation of article 9 with regard to Djaafar Sahbi.缔约国未做任何解释,委员会认为,这种情况表明存在着违反第九条第3款的情况。
In the absence of any explanation from the State party,the Committee considers that the circumstances disclose a violation of article 9, paragraph 3.鉴于缔约国未作出令人满意的解释,委员会认定对FaridFaraoun构成违反第九条的情况。
In the absence of satisfactory explanations from the State party,the Committee finds a violation of article 9 in respect of Farid Faraoun.在第1189/2003号(Fernando诉斯里兰卡)案中,委员会裁定存在违反第九条第1款的现象。
In cases Nos. 1061/2002(Fijalkowska v. Poland) and 1189/2003(Fernando v. Sri Lanka),the Committee found a violations of article 9, paragraph 1.在这些情况下,违反第九条的严重程度足以要求主管当局作出解释。
Under the circumstances, the violation of article 9 is sufficiently serious for the authorities to be required to account for it.因此违反第九条第1款的风险与违反《公约》第七条的真正风险不无关系。
Thus the risk of a violation of article 9, paragraph 1, cannot be dissociated from the real risk of a violation of article 7 of the Covenant.缔约国因此认为,指控违反第九条和第十四条无事实根据。
The State party therefore considers unfounded the allegations of a violation of articles 9 and 14.对他的拘留和公诉违反第九条第2款、第十四条第3款(甲)项。
His detention and the proceedings against him were in violation of article 9, paragraph 2, and article 14, paragraph 3(a).然而,鉴于上文作出的存在违反第九条(三)款行为的裁定,委员会认为没有必要再对这些指控进行审议。
However, in light of its finding of a violation of article 9(3) above, the Committee considers it unnecessary to consider these allegations.
In respect of the violations of article 9 the State party should compensate the author.
The State party dismisses the allegations of violations of article 9, paragraphs 1 and 2.因此,缔约国认为本来文并不包含任何表面看来违反第九条的证据。
The State party therefore considers that the present communication doesnot contain any evidence of any prima facie violation of article 9.鉴于缺乏其他资料,委员会得出结论,即存在违反第九条第1款的情况。
In the absence of any other information,the Committee concludes that there has been a violation of article 9, paragraph 1.在这种情况下,委员会认为存在着违反第九条第2款的行为。
In the circumstances, the Committee concludes that there has been a violation of article 9, paragraph 2.委员会认定,在这种情况下,确实存在违反第九条第1款的行为。
The Committee concludes that, in the circumstances, there has been a violation of article 9, paragraph 1.在一些来文中,委员会总体上认定存在违反第九条的情况。
In a number of communications the Committee found violations of article 9 in general.然而,鉴于下列原因,他们应被视为违反第九条第1款规定,遭任意拘留的境况:.
However, for the following reasons they shouldbe considered as being detained arbitrarily in violation of article 9, paragraph 1.
He thus cannot complain of a violation of article 9, paragraph 1.
The author claims that his brother was also a victim of violations of article 9.需要注意的是,秘密拘押本身就违反第九条第3款,提交人认为KamelDjebrouni的案件中显示存在违反该条款。
Recalling that incommunicado detention may constitute per se a violation of article 9, paragraph 3, the author concludes that this provision was violated in Kamel Djebrouni' s case.在提交人的案例中,委员会认为,司法机关无法对曾经或后来违反第九条第1款的拘留提出质疑,就构成了对第九条第4款的违反。
In the authors' cases, the Committee considers that the inability of the judiciary to challenge a detention that was,or had become, contrary to article 9, paragraph 1, constitutes a violation of article 9, paragraph 4.