Examples of using 塞拉利尼 in Chinese and their translations into English
{-}
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Programming
塞拉利尼和科学：一封公开信。
Seralini and science: An open letter.费罗斯被罚款€1000；塞拉利尼被给予一个象征性的€1赔偿。
塞拉利尼的团队取得了孟山都的原始数据并进行了重新分析。
Sralini's team obtained Monsanto's raw data and re-analyzed it.去年，7位专家证人尝试在法庭上反驳塞拉利尼的研究结果，但都以失败告终。
Last year seven expert witnesses tried but failed to rebut the Séralini study in a court of law.塞拉利尼的研究显示当前有关转基因生物的监管体系是不足够的。
Séralini's study shows that the current regulatory system for GMOs is inadequate.相反，EFSA却使用OECD标准来攻击塞拉利尼等人在2012年的研究【12】。
In contrast, the OECD standards havebeen used by EFSA to attack the research of Seralini et al., 2012.塞拉利尼使用的大鼠可能有或可能没有肿瘤背景发病水平，但这并不重要。
The rats that Séralini used may or may not have a high background level of getting tumours.我了解到塞拉利尼教授进行了一些比较研究，产生相当大的影响。
I learned that Professor Seralini had carried out some comparative studies, which have had a considerable impact.塞拉利尼在1999年与人共同创立了CRIIGEN，因为他认为转基因食品安全研究不足。
Séralini co-founded CRIIGEN in 1999 because he judged that studies on GM food safety were inadequate.总之，撤销塞拉利尼论文的决定，是对科学的公然侮辱，是对科学可信度和独立性的沉重打击。
In short, the decision to retract Séralini's paper is a flagrant abuse of science and a blow to its credibility and independence.塞拉利尼正确地使用与孟山都一样的大鼠品系，从而使他的研究能够与孟山都研究相比较。
Séralini correctly used the same rat strain that Monsanto used, in order to make his study comparable to Monsanto's.我们早已公布了对相同的质疑所做的回答，但至今没有见到对我们的任何回应（塞拉利尼等，2013）。
We already published some answers to the same critics in your Journal,which have not been answered(Séralini et al., 2013).”.但如果塞拉利尼的数据是真实的，80%的转基因饲料都有毒，那么动物和人就会纷纷倒下。
But if Séralini's data were real and 80% of food was poison, animals and people would be dropping like flies.年对多项动物研究的再分析发现，塞拉利尼在研究的主要结论中选择放弃统计学检验。
A 2015 reanalysis of multiple animal studies found that Seralini chose to forgo statistical tests in the main conclusions of the study.但是如果塞拉利尼的数据是真实的，80%的食物将是有毒的，那么动物和人将像苍蝇一样大量死去。
But if Séralini's data were real and 80% of food was poison, animals and people would be dropping like flies.我想您发送这份便笺，以此表达我完全支持吉尔斯-埃里克·塞拉利尼在《FoodandChemicalToxicology》上发表的文章。
I am sending you this note toexpress my full support to Dr Gilles-Eric Séralini's publication in Food and Chemical Toxicology.ANSES强调塞拉利尼等人进行的研究的弱点，但却建议对转基因生物的长期效应进行新的研究。
ANSES highlights the weaknesses of the study by Séralini et al, but recommends new research on the long-term effects of GMOs.比利时代表甚至提出对发表塞拉利尼的研究的期刊《FoodandChemicalToxicology》主编施加压力，让其撤回相关发布。
The Belgian representative even offered to pressure the editor of Food and Chemical Toxicology,the journal that published Séralini's study, to retract it.塞拉利尼和同事是发现引发策划骚扰活动的研究结果的许多研究员中的最新受害者。
Seralini and colleagues are just the latest in a series of researchers whose findings have triggered orchestrated campaigns of harassment.FCT总编在多次询问撤回决定后表示:塞拉利尼和他的支持者们强烈反对这项撤销，塞拉利尼本人也威胁要起诉FCT。
Following many enquiries about the retraction, FCT's editor-in-chief said that: Séralini and his supporters strongly objected to the retraction, and Séralini himself threatened to sue FCT.注：尽管塞拉利尼是一个著名的反转者，但他的研究却是由政府和其他一些独立机构资助的。
(Note: Although Séralini is apparently a well known opponent of GMOs, his study- and that of the review- were funded by government or other independent agencies.).塞拉利尼的研究显示，业界和监管机构都错误地否定在90天转基因食品研究中观察到的毒性效应，因为“不具有声学意义”。
Séralini's study showed that industry and regulators are wrong to dismiss toxic effects seen in 90-day studies on GM foods as“not biologically meaningful”.塞拉利尼教授提供了一些非常强有力的证据，证明之前视为安全的产品存在某些意料之外的毒性效应。
So I think Professor Seralini provided very strong evidence sufficient to establish the existence of some unexpected toxic effects from products previously considered safe.塞拉利尼事件是围绕法国分子生物学家塞拉利尼（Gilles-EricSeralini）发表、撤回和重新发表一篇期刊文章的争议。
The Séralini affair was the controversy surrounding the publication, retraction, and republication of a journal article by French molecular biologist Gilles-Éric Séralini.年，塞拉利尼起诉法国植物生物技术协会(FrenchAssociationofPlantBiotechnology)主席马克·费罗斯(MarcFellous)诽谤，此前费罗斯批评了塞拉利尼的研究，部分原因是该研究得到了绿色和平组织(Greenpeace)的资助。
In 2010 Séralini sued Marc Fellous, president of the French Association of Plant Biotechnology, for libel, after Fellous criticized Séralini's research, in part because it was funded by Greenpeace.
