What is the translation of " 诉加拿大 " in English?

• v. canada

Examples of using 诉加拿大 in Chinese and their translations into English

卢比康湖营居群首领BernardOminavak诉加拿大，.
Bernard Ominayak, Chief of the Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada.

McIntyre诉加拿大意见.
McIntyre v Canada Views.

Lakeband诉加拿大.
Lubicon Lake Band v Canada.

Lakeband诉加拿大.
The Lubicon Lake Band v Canada.

Davidson和McIntyre诉加拿大意见.
Ballantyne Davidson and McIntyre v Canada Views.

Bear诉加拿大（总检察长）案涉及部长拒绝许可申请人为加拿大养恤金计划追补缴款。
Bear v. Canada(Attorney General) involved the Minister's refusal to permit the applicant to make retroactive contributions to the Canadian Pension Plan(CPP).

因此，政府认为，在McIvor诉加拿大一案中，审理法官不适当地做出了与该法案的规定相违背的裁定。
The Government therefore believed that in the McIvor v. Canada case, the trial judge had improperly ruled against its provisions.

附录51G．第538/1993号来文；CharlesE.Stewart诉加拿大（1996年11月1日第五十八届会.
Communication No. 538/1993; Charles E. Stewart v. Canada(Views adopted on 1 November 1996, fifty-eighth session)… 47.

关于案情，缔约国指出申诉人十分依赖委员会在Stewart诉加拿大中的判例。
On the merits, the State party notes that the author relies heavily on the Committee' s jurisprudence in Stewart v. Canada.

加拿大作曲家、词作者和音乐出版者协会诉加拿大互联网服务商协会案，[2004]2S.C.R.427。
Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Canadian Assn. of Internet Providers,[2004] 2 S.C.R. 427.

在"LubiconLakeBand诉加拿大案"(1990年)中，委员会确认.
In Lubicon Lake Band v Canada(1990), the Committee recognizes that.

多数委员意见的第(7.4)段借用了Stewart诉加拿大5案中的不同意见，并不提对归化的任何不合理的阻碍。
The majority' s paragraph(7.4) borrows language from a dissenting opinion in Stewart v. Canada, and omits any mention of unreasonable impediments to naturalization.

在"Mack诉加拿大(总检察长)(2002)"案中，安大略上诉法院裁定，1947之前，习惯国际法中不存在禁止种族歧视的任何规则。
In Mack v. Canada(Attorney-General)(2002), the Ontario Court of Appeal had determined that no rule prohibiting racial discrimination had existed in customary international law before 1947.

缔约国向委员会提及了联邦法院的一些判决，其中包括Say诉加拿大(总检察长)一案，该案详细审议了做出遣返前风险评估决定的官员的独立性问题。
The State party refers the Committee to several decisions of the Federal Court, among them Say v. Canada(Solicitor General), where the independence of the PRRA decision-makers was considered in detail.

在Hodge诉加拿大（人力资源发展部长）案中，Hodge女士被拒付加拿大养恤金计划规定的遗属养恤金，因为她并未包括在“配偶”定义之内。
In Hodge v. Canada(Minister of Human Resources Development), Ms. Hodge was refused a survivor's pension under the Canada Pension Plan because she was not covered by the definition of“spouse”.

在Granovsky诉加拿大（就业和移民部长）案中，申诉者于1980年遭受了一次工作事故，然后被鉴定为临时全残。
In Granovsky v. Canada(Minister of Employment and Immigration), the applicant suffered a work-related accident in 1980 and was then assessed to be temporarily totally disabled.

在哈佛学院诉加拿大（专利专员）案中，哈佛学院就一项名叫“转基因动物”的发明申请专利，即含有致癌基因的基因被改变的动物。
In Harvard College v. Canada(Commissioner of Patents), Harvard applied for a patent on an invention called“transgenic animals”, being genetically altered animals containing a cancer-promoting gene(oncogene).

在M.A.诉加拿大案件(CAT/C/14/D/22/1995)中，撰文人被给予难民地位，可是后来被宣布为对加拿大安全的一个威胁，所以他不得不被从加拿大遣返。
In the case M.A. v. Canada(CAT/C/14/D/22/1995), the author was granted refugee status but later declared a threat to Canadian security so that he had to be removed from Canada.

这样，在涉及将一名被判以死刑的被告引渡到美国的Kindler诉加拿大(1993)的案件中，委员会认为：.
Thus, in Kindler v. Canada(1993), which involved the extradition of a convicted capital defendant to the United States of America, the Committee observed that.

第一，关于违反第十七条和第二十三条第1款，情况很像Dauphin诉加拿大的案子，a当时我表示不同意并裁定不违约。
Firstly, when it comes to a violation of articles 17 and 23, paragraph 1, the case very much resembles Dauphin v. Canada, where I dissented and found a non-violation.

在加拿大作曲家、词作者和音乐出版者协会诉加拿大互联网服务商协会案中，问题是对作品被从互联网上下载的音乐艺术家和作曲家的补偿。
Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Canadian Assn. of Internet Providers was the compensation of musical artists and composers whose works were downloaded from the Internet.

渔业管辖权(西班牙诉加拿大).
Fisheries jurisdiction(Spain v. Canada) 65 000.

渔场管辖权问题(西班牙诉加拿大)。
Fisheries Jurisdiction(Spain v. Canada).

安大略诉加拿大帝国烟草有限公司.
Ontario v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited.

(d)西班牙诉加拿大,是关于渔场管辖权问题。
(d) Spain v. Canada, concerning fisheries jurisdiction.

使用武力的合法性(塞尔维亚和黑山诉加拿大)案.
Case concerning legality of use of force(Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada) 1 500.

在第1051/2002号案件(Ahani诉加拿大)中，委员会认为：.
In case No. 1051/2002(Ahani v. Canada), the Committee considered.

在第829/1998号案件(Judge诉加拿大)中，委员会认为：.
In case No. 829/1998(Judge v. Canada), the Committee held" Question 1.

加拿大关于Ng诉加拿大和Cox诉加拿大两案的意见中重复了这些评论。
These comments were repeated in the Committee' s Views in Ng v. Canada and Cox v. Canada.