In addition, several companies were acquired andthe corporation took the first step into North America, before Mannesmann AG acquired the majority of shares in 1987.
Mannesmann声称由于伊拉克入侵和占领科威特,没有支付该项目已完成的工程。
Mannesmann alleges that due to Iraq' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait, it was not paid for works performed on the Project.
根据"概述"第30至34段的证据原则,小组认为Mannesmann未能证明它声称遭受到的损失。
Applying the evidentiary principles set out in paragraphs 30 to 34 of the Summary,the Panel finds that Mannesmann failed to establish that it incurred the alleged losses.
Mannesmann seeks compensation in the amount of DEM 4,071,825 for the cost of works performed by its subcontractor, Dodsal Pte.
特别是,小组注意到Mannesmann并没有要雇主为在伊拉克入侵和占领科威特之前发生的延误负责。
(c) In particular, the Panel notes that Mannesmann did not attempt to hold the Employer responsible for the delays that occurred prior to Iraq' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Mannesmann alleges that it did not receive any payment from the Employer in respect of these invoices and therefore did not make any payment to Dodsal.
In respect of invoice Nos. 274 to 275 and282 to 293, Mannesmann provided copies of the invoices as well as proof of shipment, but did not provide the relevant arrival certificates.
小组认为Mannesmann未能达到"概述"第144至150段为利润损失索赔所规定的证据标准。
The Panel finds that Mannesmann failed to fulfil the evidentiary standard for loss of profits claims set out in paragraphs 144 to 150 of the Summary.
In respect of the claim for invoice No. IPS/1,the supporting documentation provided by Mannesmann indicates that the performance that created the debts in question occurred prior to 2 May 1990.
在Mannesmann提供了发票副本以及有关的到达证书的情况下,小组建议赔偿全部索赔额。
Where Mannesmann provided copies of the invoices together with the relevant arrival certificates, the Panel recommends compensation in the full amount claimed.
In the cost report for theProject dated 31 July 1990, MannesmanMannesmann concluded that the delays to the Project would result in the handover of the works no earlier than 15 March 1991.
MannesmanMannesmann deducted the amount of DEM 5,258,940 from the total value of the re-routed materials to account for the proceeds received from the subsequent sale of some of the items.
The invoices, which are dated from 3 August to 6 November 1990, list the items of foodstuff together with related transportation expenses.They are accompanied by some evidence that Mannesmann paid the expenses.
Mannesmann seeks compensation in the amount of DEM 14,791,268 and IQD 296,836(which Mannesmann converted to a total of DEM 16,506,978) for retention monies.
In support of its claim, Mannesmann provided a list of the equipment undelivered material together with details of the supplier, value, quantity, purchase order numbers, name of the storage companies and places of storage.
Mannesmann Demag Krauss-Maffei GmbH(formerly known as Mannesmann Anlagenbau AG)(" Mannesmann") is a corporation organised according to the laws of Germany.
The supporting documents show that Mannesmann received the amount of DEM 33,577,198 and IQD 812,900(which Mannesmann converted to a total of DEM 38,275,760) by way of advance payment.
Mannesmann set off the advance payment against invoices issued to the Employer in the amount of DEM 29,620,690 and IQD 593,671(which Mannesmann converted to a total of DEM 33,052,110).
In particular, Mannesmann failed to establish the specific design, failed sufficiently to evidence the deterioration and failed to provide evidence of its efforts to sell the materials or other attempts to mitigate its losses.
(a) Mannesmann Demag Krauss Maffei GmbH(formerly Mannesmann Anlagenbau AG), a corporation organised according to the laws of Germany, which seeks compensation in the total amount of USD 69,687,357;
中文
Bahasa indonesia
日本語
عربى
Български
বাংলা
Český
Dansk
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Suomi
Français
עִברִית
हिंदी
Hrvatski
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
한국어
മലയാളം
मराठी
Bahasa malay
Nederlands
Norsk
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Slovenský
Slovenski
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Tagalog
Turkce
Українська
اردو
Tiếng việt