Примеры использования Acceptance rate на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Acceptance rate single-agency reports.
Other outstanding liberal arts colleges have even higher acceptance rates.
As of December 2005, the acceptance rate of the diagnostic test was reported at 85 per cent.
In the main section of the conference 783 papers were presented out of 2,620 submitted, acceptance rate 30.
As a result, the acceptance rate for the United Nations remains low see table 2.
The implementation of this resolution should lead to improvement in the acceptance rate and hence in the implementation rate. .
Acceptance rates of recommendations contained in single-organization reports and notes, 2005-2012.
The management responded by arguing that the acceptance rate was higher than indicated in Table 9 for the following reasons.
Acceptance rate of recommendations contained in single-organization reports and notes 2005-2009.
It should be noted, however, that the acceptance rate remains low for those recommendations issued in 2006 44 per cent.
Acceptance rate of recommendations contained in single-organization reports and notes 2005-2007.
The implementation rate tends to be lower than the acceptance rate, mainly due to the reasons stated above.
The acceptance rate should be calculated as a percentage of the responses received not of the total number of recommendations.
To date, the Committee has also recorded a 75% acceptance rate among the first States parties to which it has offered this option.
Acceptance rate of recommendations contained in single-organization reports and notes, 2006-2010 Percentage.
This means the airline will better control card acceptance rates, which in turn could lead to higher sales and lower transaction costs.
Acceptance rate of recommendations contained in system-wide and multiorganization reports and notes, 2006-2010.
Caring& Qualified Teachers: Strict hiring standards,with 2% teacher acceptance rate; Dedicated, full-time teachers with teaching degrees iii.
Acceptance rate of recommendations contained in system-wide reports and notes and those concerning several organizations 2005-2007.
It is worthwhile to mention that JIU, for its single-agency reportsissued during 2002- 2004, had reached an acceptance rate of 90 per cent by the end of 2005.
From 2009 onwards, the acceptance rate declined at an increasing rate, resting at 23 per cent in the year 2011.
An analysis of available data concerning the 205 recommendations contained in single-organization reports and notes issued in 2005, 2006 and2007 as at the end of 2008 shows that the acceptance rate has reached 90 per cent for 2005.
For system-wide reports, the acceptance rate tends to be somewhat lower and implementation takes more time.
An analysis of available data concerning the 183 recommendations contained in single-organization reports and notes issued in 2006,2007 and 2008 as at the end of 2009 shows a stable trend with a 64 per cent acceptance rate, which is considered as very satisfactory.
In the case of single-organization reports and notes, the acceptance rate for 2006-2008, as at the end of 2009, had been stable at 64 per cent.
Acceptance rates of recommendations in single-agency reports issued in 2004 and 2005 had reached 72 per cent by the end of 2006 and it was hoped that the rate for 2007 would be significantly higher.
A solution that can be configured to meet your specific business rules,maximize acceptance rates, and increase customer confidence on all hardware platforms is a key requirement.
For 2008 alone, the acceptance rate stood at a particularly encouraging 82 per cent, while rejected recommendations had fallen to 5 per cent, and the implementation rate for accepted recommendations had tripled to 67 per cent, not including the 22 per cent of recommendations for which implementation was in progress.
His delegation had long advocated that JIU should focus onissues of system-wide relevance, and remained concerned that acceptance rates of recommendations contained in system-wide reports were relatively low, compared to single-organization reports.
In the case of system-wide reports, the acceptance rate after one year was much lower, owing to the fact that it often took a long time for reports to reach the organizations' governing bodies.