Примеры использования Disguised restriction на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In this regard, such measures should not constitute discrimination or disguised restriction on international trade.
In this case, the Court ruled that the exercise of such a right can constitute a disguised restriction on trade in the EEC if it is established that a practice of using different marks for the same product, or preventing the use of a trademark name on repackaged goods, was adopted in order to achieve partition of markets and to maintain artificially high prices.
No such question was put to the United States concerning the field of application of the third standard- disguised restriction on international trade.
Bis.[Not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade;] compromised text from the agriculture part.
Each resident or guest Simferopol, which will have time to run it until the end of the action, will receive from us 150 rubles on the first order:without any conditions or a disguised restriction.
Emphasizes that trade policy measures for environmental purposes should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade and that unilateral actions to deal with environmental challenges outside the jurisdiction of the importing country must be avoided;
Measures taken to combat climate change, including unilateral ones, should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade.
Emphasizes that trade policy measures for environmental purposes should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade and that, in this respect, unilateral actions to deal with environmental challenges outside the jurisdiction of the importing country should be avoided;
Trade provisions in MEAs should be transparent and should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade.
Mitigation actions, policies and measures shall not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade(Algeria et al, MISC.5/Add.2);
Moreover, the measures found to be justified under the footnote would normally be expected to meet the requirement in the chapeau of Article XIV that they should not constitute a disguised restriction on trade.
Subject to the requirement that such measures are not applied in a manner which would constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail, or disguised restriction on international trade, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent the adoption or enforcement by any contracting party of measures.
Second, the requirement should not be(a) an arbitrary discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail;(b)unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail;(c) a disguised restriction on trade.
Through existing bilateral and multilateral channels; bearing in mind that these activities shall not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade in accordance with Article 3, paragraph 5 of the Convention.
The United States further understands the language at the end of the second sentence of paragraph 57 to mean that measures adopted for environmental purposes should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade.
Such prohibitions or restrictions shall not, however,constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between the Parties.
In that context, it was widely accepted that trade measures should be compatible with Principle 12 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development(1992), in which it was stated that trade policy measures for environmental purposes should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade.
Affirms[Further decides] that cooperative sectoral approaches and sector-specific actions in the agriculture sector should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade[, in accordance with Article 3, paragraph 5 of the Convention];
Address non-tariff measures and reduce or eliminate arbitrary or unjustified non-tariff barriers, i.e., those that are not in conformity with World Trade Organization rules; standards and technical regulations must be developed transparently and applied in a non-discriminatory manner, andshould be technically justified and not constitute a disguised restriction on international trade.
Efforts to promote sustainable consumption and production should not be applied in a manner that would constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail, or a disguised restriction on international trade, and should otherwise be in accordance with the provisions of agreements under the World Trade Organization;
Understanding that States should cooperate to promote a supportive and open international economic system that would lead to economic growth and sustainable development in all countries in order to better address the problems of environmental degradation, and that trade policy measures for environmental purposes should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustified discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade;
Trade policy measures for environmental purposes should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade;
For example, both GATT and GATS ensure that nothing may prevent States from implementing measures that are necessary to protect public morals and to protect human, animal or plant life or health so long as the measures are not applied in a manner that constitutes arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where thesame conditions prevail and do not constitute a disguised restriction on international trade.
Trade policy measures for environmental purposes should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade.
That, taking into account the relevant provisions of the Convention and further recognizing the principle enshrined in Article 3, paragraph 5, Parties in the pursuit of the objective and implementation of the Convention, shall not resort to any measures, in particular unilateral fiscal or non-fiscal measures applied on the border, against goods and services imported from Parties, that constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustified discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade.
Trade policy measures for environmental purposes should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade.
Taking into account the relevant provisions of the Convention and further recognizing the principle enshrined in Article 3, paragraph 5, agrees that Parties in the pursuit of the objective and implementation of the Convention, shall not resort to any measures, in particular unilateral fiscal or non-fiscal measures applied on the border, against goods and services imported from Parties, that constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustified discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade;
Affirms that cooperative sectoral approaches and sector-specific actions in the agriculture sector should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade;
Affirming that cooperative sectoral approaches and sector-specific actions in the agriculture sector should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade.
Reaffirming that any approach to enhance the cost-effectiveness, and to promote, mitigation actions should not constitute a means of arbitrary orunjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade;