Примеры использования Gpl-covered на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Can I combine orlink Q with a GPL-covered program?
Can I use GPL-covered editors such as GNU Emacs to develop nonfree programs?
Can the US Government release improvements to a GPL-covered program?
People could run free GPL-covered Linux drivers with Windows systems.
Am I required to claim a copyright on my modifications to a GPL-covered program?
People could run free GPL-covered Linux drivers with Windows systems.
QUESTION: You could require the trademark be displayed with GPL-covered programs.
A system incorporating a GPL-covered program is an extended version of that program.
Can I release a nonfree program that's designed to load a GPL-covered plug-in?( NFUseGPLPlugins).
My friend got a GPL-covered binary with an offer to supply source, and made a copy for me.
I want to distribute an extended version of a GPL-covered program in binary form.
I would like to modify GPL-covered programs and link them with the portability libraries from Money Guzzler Inc.
If you see a violation of the GPL,you should inform the developers of the GPL-covered software involved.
If I know someone has a copy of a GPL-covered program, can I demand they give me a copy?
But, given the situation,would we really want to scrape up the resources to maintain an alternate GPL-covered version of X?
Can I release a modified version of a GPL-covered program in binary form only?( ModifiedJustBinary).
If a programming language interpreter has a license that isincompatible with the GPL, can I run GPL-covered programs on it?
All code added to a GPL-covered program must be free software, even if it is put in a separate file.
But, given the situation,would we really want to scrape up the resources to maintain an alternate GPL-covered version of X?
If you release an improved version of a GPL-covered program, you must release the improved source code under the GPL.
If Netscape feels it can live with the trouble of(effectively) proprietary modifications,surely the trouble of GPL-covered modifications is a small by comparison.
If I write a plug-in to use with a GPL-covered program, what requirements does that impose on the licenses I can use for distributing my plug-in?
The X11 license is compatible with the GPL,so you can add a module to the GPL-covered program and put it under the X11 license.
I hope some day we will have a large collection of GPL-covered libraries that have no parallel available to proprietary software, providing useful modules to serve as building blocks in new free software, and adding up to a major advantage for further free software development.
What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?( TradeSecretRelease).
What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?( TradeSecretRelease2).
Since the QPL is incompatiblewith the GNU GPL, you cannot take a GPL-covered program and QPL-covered program and link them together, no matter how.
The programmers who write improvements to GCC(or Emacs, or Bash,or Linux, or any GPL-covered program) are often employed by companies or universities.
If they form a single combined program this means that combination of the GPL-covered plug-in with the nonfree main program would violate the GPL.
The programmers who write improvements to GCC(or Emacs, or Bash,or Linux, or any GPL-covered program) are often employed by companies or universities.