Примеры использования He saw no need на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
He saw no need to amend article 18.
Article 112 raised no problems, except that he saw no need for the words“without any kind of discrimination”.
He saw no need for a cross-reference to article 4.
Since the other cases were covered by other paragraphs, he saw no need to delete the words"requested or" in new paragraph 2.
He saw no need for a further formal meeting to discuss the matter.
Bearing that in mind, andin view of the brevity of the Conference, he saw no need for the establishment of any additional subsidiary body at the current stage.
He saw no need to deal with aggression separately in article 23, paragraph 2.
Given that full budgetary estimates for one year had been considered by the Advisory Committee, he saw no need for further approval by ACABQ before expenditure under the commitment authority was authorized.
He saw no need for a further session to discuss the issues contained in it.
The situation remains difficult in Moscow, as in previous years. In an interview in the October issue of Afisha,Moscow's Mayor Sergei Sobyanin once more repeated that he saw no need to build new mosques since the vast majority of potential attendees were migrants.
Mr. HENKIN said he saw no need to seek clarification.
He saw no need to maintain the reservation, and hoped that the Government would consider withdrawing it.
Concerning article 112, he saw no need for the bracketed words“without any kind of discrimination”.
He saw no need to make a hasty decision on the matter and urged the Committee to consider it in more depth.
Mr. Rakovskiy(Russian Federation)said that he saw no need to repeat his country's position regarding the clichéd accusations of the Georgian delegation.
He saw no need to change the text and, indeed, the very phrase in the third sentence of paragraph 1 that Benin wished to delete clarified the intention.
As to draft article 17(Other cases of termination,withdrawal or suspension), he saw no need for a general and abstract formulation, but it might be useful to include a new subparagraph consistent with article 57, paragraph(a) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
However, he saw no need to mention the victim's relatives since that issue was not crucial to establishment of the scope of application of article 1.
In particular, he saw no need for the retention of the Secretary-General's report.
He saw no need for including such a provision in the final clauses, and believed that if a political message was intended it should more properly be placed in the preamble to the Statute.
In that respect, he saw no need for the broad obligation proposed in article 11, paragraph 3.
However, he saw no need for the establishment of new mechanisms to monitor their implementation, since that would necessitate complex negotiations which might hinder the drafting of the two protocols.
Mr. EL SHAFEI said he saw no need to include the question in paragraph(a), since it had been covered in the report.
He saw no need for further discussion on draft article 19, as the primacy of the obligations under the Charter of the United Nations over obligations under other international agreements was self-evident.
Moreover, he saw no need for a distinction between human rights and other treaties.
He saw no need for article 16, and on article 19he considered that the problem would be better dealt with through cooperation between the Court and the court which had carried out the initial trial.
Mr. Haraguchi(Japan) said that he saw no need for document A/C.3/57/L.91 on the programme budget implications of draft resolution A/C… 3/57/L.90, since the Extraordinary Chambers were to be financed from voluntary contributions.
However, he saw no need to draw attention to that right in the reporting guidelines and therefore believed that the reference to the State's option of submitting a full report could be safely removed.
However, he saw no need to deal with the elements of crime, but would not refrain from cooperating on that issue, provided that the elements of crime were not incorporated in the Statute, but were addressed afterwards by the Preparatory Commission.
AIG Majeed told the Commission that he saw no need to establish the authenticity of the intercept or the basis for its analysis, including the voice identification and the interpretation of the conversation as a reference to Ms. Bhutto's assassination.