Примеры использования Jeliazkov на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Mr. Dimitar Jeliazkov, Vice-President, Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Bulgaria.
The authors also submit that there has not been any meaningful dialogue with the Dobri Jeliazkov community concerning the provision of alternative accommodation and relocation.
The Dobri Jeliazkov community appealed the Sofia City Court's decision before the Supreme Administrative Court, which upheld it on 28 October 2009.
The community did not comply with this request and, on 24 July 2006, the Metropolitan Municipality,Vuzrajdane subdistrict, issued an eviction order against the Dobri Jeliazkov community.
Indeed, they still reside in the Dobri Jeliazkov community which has existed in that location for over seventy years.
The authors submit that it is largely due to the persistent pattern of racial discrimination against Roma that the Dobri Jeliazkov community is an informal settlement e.g.,"unlawful buildings.
Subsequent to this meeting, a deputy mayor met with the Dobri Jeliazkov community and informed them that the authorities refused to agree with re-establishment of water access for the community.
They claim a violation by Bulgaria of their rights under articles 2, 17 and 26 of the InternationalCovenant on Civil and Political Rights in case of eviction and demolition of housing in the Dobri Jeliazkov community.
It argues that the municipal authorities are engaged in a dialogue with the representatives of the Dobri Jeliazkov community, which may be seen from records of the Roma Municipal Council's workings in the Vuzrajdane subdistrict.
They claim a violation by Bulgaria of their rights under articles 2,; article 17 and article 26 of the InternationalCovenant on Civil and Political Rights(Covenant) in case of eviction and demolition of housing in the Dobri Jeliazkov community.
The State party was informed that, while the authors have not been forcibly evicted,cutting off the water supply to the Dobri Jeliazkov community could be considered as indirect means of achieving eviction.
The threatened forced eviction of the Dobri Jeliazkov community is largely due to the inhabitants' Roma ethnicity and the informal housing conditions in which Roma have to live because of their ethnic origin.
With reference to the jurisprudence of the European Committee of Social Rights, the authors add that,in the event that the Dobri Jeliazkov community is considered informal or"illegal", that alone still does not justify forced eviction.
If the Dobri Jeliazkov community prefers the provision of alternative housing, its inhabitants must be allowed to freely, actively and meaningfully participate in all decisions related to such provision of alternative housing.
It argues that the municipal authorities are engaged in a dialogue with the representatives of the Dobri Jeliazkov community, which may be ascertained seen fromby protocols records of the Roma Municipal Council's functioningworkings at in the"Vuzrajdane" subdistrict.
The Committee is concerned at the increasing number of forced evictions of Roma from their homes,including through large-scale evictions such as the execution of the eviction order delivered on 23 June 2011 to the Dobri Jeliazkov Roma community in Sofia district.
The Committee further observes that the eviction of the Dobri Jeliazkov community was to be implemented in July 2011 and that there were no further domestic remedies available to the authors that could have prevented the eviction from taking place.
Since then the order has been subject to imminent execution. On 26 March 2011 the Sofia Municipality issued a protocol for executionof the eviction order. This protocol was handed to the inhabitants of the Dobri Jeliazkov community on 23 June 2011, and they were given seven days to submit their objections.
They submit that the remedies should include the regularization of Dobri Jeliazkov community, including the provision of a degree of security of tenure which guarantees legal protection against forced eviction, harassment and other threats.
The authors further argued that they could not have resorted to the Commission on the Protection against Discrimination, since the subject matter of the present communication had already been litigated before the State party's courts and that, in any event, there was no domestic law orremedy available to them that could have prevented the eviction of the Dobri Jeliazkov community.
The authors add that remedies should also include the regularization of the Dobri Jeliazkov community, including the provision of a degree of security of tenure which guarantees legal protection against forced eviction, harassment and other threats.
According to the authors, none of those to be forcibly evicted have been offered alternative housing; no meaningful consultation has taken place with the community; and the mayor of the Sofia Municipality, Vuzrajdane subdistrict, has stated that the municipality could not provide alternative housing for the families,since they lived in the Dobri Jeliazkov community illegally.
The authors submit in conclusion that, if the forced eviction of the Dobri Jeliazkov community is implemented, the State party would violate articles 17 and 26 of the Covenant, read alone and in conjunction with article 2, including the non-discrimination clause of article 2, paragraph 2, of the Covenant.
This meeting was later attended by the mayor of the Sofia Metropolitan Municipality, Vuzrajdane subdistrict,as these local authorities claim to own the plot of land on which the Dobri Jeliazkov community has resided for over seventy years and therefore have to agree to any re-establishment of access to water.
In these circumstances,the Committee is satisfied that the authors' houses in the Dobri Jeliazkov community are their"homes" within the meaning of article 17 of the Covenant, irrespective of the fact that the authors are not the lawful owners of the plot of land on which these houses had been constructed.
The authors of the communication, dated 25 June 2011, are Liliana Assenova Naidenova, Blaga Lubchova Naidenova, Traianka Ivanova Naidenova, Gura Borisova Marinova, Pavel Triachev Peshev, Blagoi Trianov Assenov, Pavlina Marinova Mladenova, Stefka Vassileva Christova, Stoianka Tzvetanova Trianova and Vela Borisova Mihailova,all Bulgarian nationals of Roma ethnicity belonging to the Dobri Jeliazkov community, situated in Sofia, Bulgaria.
The authors claim that the enforcement of the eviction order of24 July 2006 and their subsequent removal from the Dobri Jeliazkov community would amount to subjecting them to arbitrary and unlawful interference with their homes and would, therefore, violate their respective rights under article 17 of the Covenant.
The Committee notes the authors' claims that the Dobri Jeliazkov community existed with the acquiescence of the State party's authorities for over seventy years, that the"green zone" was established retroactively(see paras. 6.2 and 7 above) and that, according to the mayor of the Sofia Municipality, Vuzrajdane subdistrict, they could not be provided with social housing, since they lived in unlawful buildings constructed on municipal land see para. 2.4 above.
The Committee further notes that, although the State party's authorities are in principle entitled to remove the authors,who occupy municipal land unlawfully, their lack of property rights over the plot of municipal land in question was the only stated justification for the issuance of the eviction order against the Dobri Jeliazkov community and that the State party has not identified any urgent reason for forcibly evicting the authors from their homes before providing them with adequate alternative accommodation.
As to the State party's assertion that the threatened forced eviction of the Dobri Jeliazkov community has not been carried out"due to the determination of the municipal authorities to find a durable solution of the issue", the authors assert that it was rather due to the interim measures requested by the Committee.