Примеры использования Large-scale pelagic на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing.
Malaysia is against the use of large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing.
II. Large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing.
ICFA stated that it opposed large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing.
Large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing.
Furthermore, Korea has faithfully complied with the global moratorium on large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing.
Large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing and its.
Little information is available concerning the use of large-scale pelagic drift-net vessels in the Atlantic Ocean.
Large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing and its.
The United Nations drift-net moratorium forbids large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing on the high seas.
Ii. large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing and its impact.
Continue to ensure compliance with the global moratorium on large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing on the high seas.
Large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing and its impact.
In this regard, I should like briefly to note the Secretary-General's report on large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing.
Law of the sea: large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing and.
The United Arab Emirates has previously indicated its support of General Assembly resolution 46/215 concerning the global moratorium on all large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing;
Large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing and its impact on the.
It also indicated that the use of large-scale pelagic drift-nets had not been reported on the adjacent high seas.
Large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing and its impact on the.
Expressing concern that the practice of large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing remains a threat to marine living resources.
Large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing implementation of General Assembly resolution 46/215.
In its reply to the Secretary-General dated 2 July 1997,Pakistan reported that it fully supported the global moratorium on large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing on the high seas.
Prohibition of large-scale pelagic driftnet fishing Resolution.
In resolution 46/215 the General Assembly called,inter alia, for full implementation of a global moratorium on all large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing on the high seas.
Large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing and its impact on the living marine resources of the world's oceans and seas.
Several non-EC Mediterranean States have adopted restrictive regulations concerning the use of large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing gear by vessels flying their respective flags.
Malaysia did not have any large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing that would fall under the ambit of General Assembly resolution 46/215.
In its submission of 23 June 1993 to the Secretary-General, Namibia reiterated its strong support for all actions andmeasures prohibiting the use of large-scale pelagic drift-nets.
Its member States had reaffirmed that large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing had never been practised in the NAFO Convention area.
The United States firmly believes that the best available scientific evidencedemonstrates the wastefulness and potential ecosystem-scale negative impacts of large-scale pelagic drift-net fishing on the high seas.