Примеры использования Petromin на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
IM Ipedex Production Ipedex Petromin Lubricating Oil Company.
Petromin would from time to time sell to SAMA varying quantities of gold.
Claim of general petroleum& minerals organisation(petromin) mahd ad'dahab mine.
The Panel established that Petromin is an agency of the Saudi Arabian Government.
Petromin alleges that 37 of its employees were delayed in returning to work from their vacation in December 1990.
In the circumstances the Panel finds that Petromin has failed to show that it suffered the loss alleged.
Petromin alleged that, for seven of the shipments to Sweden, the relevant insurance premiums had increased by USD 2,717.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, andfor the sake of continuity, the claimant will be referred to in the remainder of this section of this report as"Petromin.
As a result, Petromin instructed its recruitment agent in Manila to hire 17 replacements.
In relation to five shipments of concentrate from Jeddah to Osaka,Japan, Petromin claimed that it paid increased freight and insurance costs of USD 4,019.
The Panel finds that Petromin earned no extraordinary profits as a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
At the time of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait,the shares in Samref were owned by Saudi Aramco's predecessor in title, Petromin, and Mobil in equal proportions.
The stock records reflect that Petromin continued to increase the size of its gold stockpile after Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The case summarized below was reported to the Working Group as follows: Hussain Khaled Albuluwy, 36 years old, of Saudi nationality,is an IT Manager for the RMZ Company located in the Petromin neighbourhood of Dammam.
Additionally, the Panel finds that Petromin failed to provide proof of payment for the recruitment agent's placement fees or the cost of the air tickets.
Petromin alleges that it incurred additional insurance premium costs of USD 758 in relation to the importation of items of equipment required at its mine.
In its category"E" claim form dated 27 October 1993,the claimant("Petromin") described itself as"General Petroleum& Minerals Organisation(Petromin) Mahd ad'Dahab Mine.
Petromin's principal place of business is located in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Petromin maintains a branch office in Jeddah and various other premises throughout Saudi Arabia.
At all material times,all of Samref's products were purchased by its two shareholders, Mobil and Petromin, in equal proportions and at prices established according to a predetermined formula.
In return, GPMO agreed to supply Petromin with Iraqi oil of equivalent value at a similar average daily quantity beginning approximately on 1 January 1984.
Petromin alleges that 33 employees on home leave in the Philippines in December 1990 could not return directly from Manila to Jeddah as a result of disruptions to airline schedules.
At the time of filing its claim, Petromin operated a gold mine at Mahd ad'Dahab("the mine"), approximately 150 kilometres north-east of Jeddah.
Petromin alleges that, as a result of general disruptions to existing transportation schedules and delays in arranging insurance and freight, four shipments of bullion to Petromin's London bullion refiner were delayed by an average of 27 days in the period between 14 January and 4 April 1991.
Extraordinary profits The Panel investigated whether Petromin had increased its production or generated extraordinary profits as a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Petromin claims compensation in the amount of USD 263,725 under the categories of loss described in the category"E" claim form as"business transaction or course of dealing" and"other". Petromin subdivides its claim into the loss elements described in table 26 below.
With respect to the increased insurance andtransportation charges, Petromin provided copies of the contracts regulating the refining of its concentrates by both the Swedish and the Japanese refiners that were operative at the time.
The Panel finds that Petromin failed to provide sufficient supporting evidence in regard to the rerouting costs. The Panel accordingly recommends no compensation for this claim element.
By an exchange contract dated 7 December 1982 entered into between Petromin and the General Petroleum Marketing Organisation of the Republic of Iraq(“GPMO”), Petromin agreed to supply GPMO with an average of 184,000 barrels of Saudi Arabian oil per day for one year beginning 1 January 1983.
The Panel finds that Petromin provided no substantiating evidence in regard to the cost of the three-minute overseas telephone calls, the additional communication expenses and the increased insurance premiums.
Iraq further states that Petromin provided no information concerning the fluctuation in the price of gold and silver, or whether Petromin made additional profits due to the increase in the price of the metals.